Literature DB >> 26299325

Can hip abduction and external rotation discriminate sacroiliac joint pain?

Divya Bharatkumar Adhia1, Steve Tumilty2, Ramakrishnan Mani2, Stephan Milosavljevic2, Melanie D Bussey3.   

Abstract

AIM: The primary aim of the study is to determine if Hip Abduction and External Rotation (HABER) test is capable of reproducing familiar pain in individuals with low back pain (LBP) of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) origin (SIJ-positive) when compared with LBP of Non-SIJ origin (SIJ-negative). If so, the secondary aim is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of HABER test against the reference standard of pain provocation tests, and to determine which increments of the HABER test has highest sensitivity and specificity for identifying SIJ-positive individuals.
DESIGN: Single-blinded diagnostic accuracy study.
METHOD: Participants [n(122)] between ages of 18-50 y, suffering from chronic non-specific LBP (≥3 months) volunteered in the study. An experienced musculoskeletal physiotherapist evaluated and classified participants into either SIJ-positive [n(45)] or SIJ-negative [n(77)], based on reference standard of pain provocation tests [≥3 positive tests = SIJ-positive]. Another musculoskeletal physiotherapist, blinded to clinical groups, evaluated participants for reproduction of familiar pain during each increment (10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, and 50°) of HABER test.
RESULTS: The HABER test reproduced familiar pain in SIJ-positive individuals when compared with SIJ-negative individuals [p (0.001), R(2) (0.38), Exp(β) (5.95-10.32)], and demonstrated moderate level of sensitivity (67%-78%) and specificity (71%-72%) for identifying SIJ-positive individuals. Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated that the HABER increments of ≥30° have the highest sensitivity (83%-100%) and specificity (52%-64%).
CONCLUSIONS: The HABER test is capable of reproducing familiar pain in SIJ-positive LBP individuals and has moderate levels of sensitivity and specificity for identifying SIJ-positive LBP individuals.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical tests; Sacroiliac joint; Sensitivity; Specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26299325     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  4 in total

1.  CHANGES IN PELVIC TILT DURING THREE DIFFERENT RECIPROCAL STANCE POSITIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SACROILIAC JOINT REGIONAL PAIN.

Authors:  Michael T Cibulka; Bradley Morr; Justin Wedel; Zachary Bohr; Garrett Jones; Cory Herman; Michael J Strube
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12

2.  Comparative Analysis of the Pain Provocation Test and the HABER Test to Diagnose Nonspecific Low-Back Pain Associated with the Sacroiliac Joint.

Authors:  Jujeong Park; Seung-Chul Chon
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  Knee Flexion Angle Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Relates to a Preoperative Range of Motion of the Hip.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Seiji Kubo; Yutaka Sato; Koji Takayama; Kiyonori Mizuno; Ryosuke Kuroda; Tomoyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Diagnosis and Characters of Non-Specific Low Back Pain in Japan: The Yamaguchi Low Back Pain Study.

Authors:  Hidenori Suzuki; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Yasuaki Imajo; Yuichiro Yoshida; Norihiro Nishida; Toshihiko Taguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.