| Literature DB >> 26298837 |
Takako Eto1, Yan Zhao2, Akiko Maruyama1, Kaname Miyashita3, Aiko Yasui4, Seiki Nakao4, Kenichi Taguchi4, Mototsugu Shimokawa4, Shinya Oda5, Toshiaki Saito1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Microsatellite instability (MSI) in human endometrial cancer (EC) was analysed using a unique fluorescent technique. MSI is associated with various human neoplasms. However, the reported frequency of MSI differs widely in each malignancy. Methodological difficulties have in fact been pointed out in its assay techniques.Entities:
Keywords: DNA mismatch repair; Endometrial cancer; Familial predisposition; KRAS mutation; Microsatellite instability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26298837 PMCID: PMC4717170 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-015-2030-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ISSN: 0171-5216 Impact factor: 4.553
Fig. 1Microsatellite alterations observed in human endometrial cancer. Using genomic DNA samples prepared from tumour and the corresponding normal tissues, microsatellite sequences, indicated at the right top of each panel, were independently amplified by PCR with differentially labelled primers, then mixed and co-electrophoresed in an automated DNA sequencer. Representative results are shown and detected microsatellite alterations are indicated by arrows: red lines cancer, green lines normal tissues, a negative cases, b Type A MSI, c Type B MSI, d cases suspected for LOH. Data in cases of separate and inseparable heterozygous microsatellites are shown in left and right columns, respectively. Patient codes corresponding to those used in Table 1 are also indicated at the right of each panel
Microsatellite alterations observed n 94 endometrioid endometrial cancer patients
| Patient code | Microsatellite | MSI A/B | MSI-H/L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D2S | D5S | D10S | D11S | D13S | |||
| 1 | B | B | B | – | B | B | H |
| 2 | B | B | B | A | – | Ba | H |
| 3 | B | B | B | A | A | B | H |
| 4 | B | B | B | A | B | B | H |
| 5 | A | B | B | A | B | B | H |
| 6 | B | A | B | – | B | B | H |
| 7 | B | B | B | A | B | B | H |
| 8 | B | B | B | A | B | B | H |
| 9 | B | A | B | – | B | B | H |
| 10 | A | A | B | A | B | B | H |
| 11 | A | B | B | – | A | B | H |
| 12b | B | B | A | A | A | B | H |
| 13 | B | A | B | – | A | B | H |
| 14 | A | B | B | – | A | B | H |
| 15 | A | B | B | A | – | B | H |
| 16 | B | A | B | A | – | B | H |
| 17 | B | – | A | – | B | B | H |
| 18 | A | B | B | A | A | B | H |
| 19 | A | A | B | A | B | B | H |
| 20 | B | A | A | – | A | B | H |
| 21 | A | A | B | A | A | B | H |
| 22 | A | A | B | A | A | B | H |
| 23 | A | A | B | A | A | B | H |
| 24 | A | B | A | A | A | B | H |
| 25 | B | A | A | A | A | B | H |
| 26 | B | A | A | A | – | B | H |
| 27 | B | A | A | – | A | B | H |
| 28 | A | A | A | – | B | B | H |
| 29 | A | A | B | – | – | B | H |
| 30 | A | B | A | – | A | B | H |
| 31 | A | A | A | – | A | A | H |
| 32 | A | A | A | A | – | A | H |
| 33 | A | A | LOH’c | A | A | A | H |
| 34 | A | – | – | A | A | A | H |
| 35 | A | – | A | – | – | A | H |
| 36 | A | – | – | – | – | A | L |
| 37 | A | – | – | LOH’ | – | A | L |
| 38 | LOH | A | – | – | – | A | L |
| 39 | LOH’ | – | – | – | N | S | |
| 40 | – | – | – | – | LOH’ | N | S |
| 41 | – | LOH’ | LOH’ | – | – | N | S |
| 42 | – | – | – | LOH’ | – | N | S |
| 43 | LOH’ | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 44 | LOH’ | LOH’ | – | – | LOH’ | N | S |
| 45 | – | LOH’ | – | LOH | – | N | S |
| 46 | – | LOH | – | – | LOH’ | N | S |
| 47 | – | LOH | LOH’ | LOH | LOH’ | N | S |
| 48 | LOH | – | LOH’ | – | – | N | S |
| 49 | – | – | LOH | LOH | LOH’ | N | S |
| 50 | LOH | – | LOH’ | – | – | N | S |
| 51 | LOH | – | LOH’ | – | – | N | S |
| 52 | LOH | – | – | LOH | LOH’ | N | S |
| 53 | LOH | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 54 | – | LOH | LOH | – | N | S | |
| 55 | – | – | LOH | – | LOH | N | S |
| 56 | – | – | – | – | LOH | N | S |
| 57 | – | LOH | – | – | N | S | |
| 58 | – | – | LOH | LOH | – | N | S |
| 59 | – | – | LOH | – | – | N | S |
| 60 | – | LOH | – | – | N | S | |
| 61 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 62 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 63 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 64 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 65 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 66 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 67 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 68 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 69 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 70 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 71 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 72 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 73 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 74 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 75 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 76 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 77 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 78 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 79 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 80 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 81 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 82 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 83 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 84 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 85 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 86 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 87 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 88 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 89 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 90 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 91 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 92 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 93 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
| 94 | – | – | – | – | – | N | S |
MSI microsatellite instability, A Type A MSI, B Type B MSI, H MSI-high, L MSI-low, IHC immunohistochemistry, + expressed, − no change/not expressed, ND not done, LOH loss of heterozygosity
aTumours are classified as Type B when Type B alterations are observed in at least one marker
bThe patient fulfilled Amsterdam Criteria II (Vasen et al. 1999), and a deleterious mutation (I586delT) of MLH1 was found in the tumour. Sequence alterations were not detected in the other tumours
cChanges theoretically indistinguishable between MSI and LOH are indicated as ‘LOH’’ (see text)
Relationship between MSI-H/L and Type A/B MSI
| Type A | Type B | Subtotal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSI-H | 5 | 30 | 35 |
| MSI-L | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Subtotal | 8 | 30 | 38 |
p = 0.01
Clinicopathological variables and the NCI classification of MSI in endometrial cancer
| MSI grade |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI-L | MSI-H | MSS | ||
| Number of cases | 3 | 35 | 56 | |
| Age | ||||
| ≤55 | 3 | 23 | 24 | 0.02 |
| ≥56 | 0 | 12 | 32 | |
| Stage | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 24 | 39 | 0.79 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 14 | |
| 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Grade | ||||
| 1 | 0 | 14 | 23 | 0.45 |
| 2 | 2 | 12 | 24 | |
| 3 | 1 | 9 | 9 | |
| Survival | ||||
| Alive | 3 | 33 | 47 | 0.31 |
| Dead | 0 | 2 | 9 | |
| Family history | ||||
| Any cancer | ||||
| Yes | 1 | 22 | 30 | 0.54 |
| No | 2 | 13 | 26 | |
| Colorectal cancer | ||||
| Yes | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0.03 |
| No | 2 | 28 | 53 | |
| Gastric cancer | ||||
| Yes | 0 | 11 | 16 | 0.70 |
| No | 3 | 24 | 40 | |
| HNPCC-associated cancersa | ||||
| Yes | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0.20 |
| No | 2 | 19 | 40 | |
| Double cancer | ||||
| Yes | 0 | 4 | 12 | 0.43 |
| No | 3 | 31 | 44 | |
| Menopause | ||||
| Before | 2 | 12 | 19 | 0.58 |
| After | 1 | 23 | 37 | |
aCarcinomas in the colorectum, endometrium, ovary and stomach were scored as ‘HNPCC-associated cancers’ (Vasen et al. 1999). The other HNPCC-related tumours were not found in the patients’ kindred
Clinicopathological variables and the MSI mode of MSI in endometrial cancer
| MSI mode |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type A | Type B | negative | ||
| Number of cases | 8 | 30 | 56 | |
| Age | ||||
| <55 | 8 | 18 | 24 | 0.01 |
| >56 | 0 | 12 | 32 | |
| Stage | ||||
| 1 | 5 | 21 | 39 | 0.76 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | 7 | 14 | |
| 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Grade | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 12 | 23 | 0.65 |
| 2 | 3 | 11 | 24 | |
| 3 | 3 | 7 | 9 | |
| Survival | ||||
| Alive | 8 | 28 | 47 | 0.36 |
| Dead | 0 | 2 | 9 | |
| Family history | ||||
| Any cancer | ||||
| Yes | 3 | 20 | 30 | 0.26 |
| No | 5 | 10 | 26 | |
| Colorectal cancer | ||||
| Yes | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0.04 |
| No | 7 | 23 | 53 | |
| Gastric cancer | ||||
| Yes | 0 | 11 | 16 | 0.14 |
| No | 8 | 19 | 40 | |
| HNPCC-associated cancersa | ||||
| Yes | 1 | 16 | 16 | 0.03 |
| No | 7 | 14 | 40 | |
| Double cancer | ||||
| Yes | 0 | 4 | 12 | 0.33 |
| No | 8 | 26 | 44 | |
| Menopause | ||||
| Before | 3 | 11 | 19 | 0.95 |
| After | 5 | 19 | 37 | |
aCarcinomas in the colorectum, endometrium, ovary and stomach were scored as ‘HNPCC-associated cancers’ (Vasen et al. 1999). The other HNPCC-related tumours were not found in the patients’ kindred
KRAS mutation and MSI-H/L
| MSI-L | MSI-H | Subtotal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRAS | |||
| Mutant | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Wild type | 2 | 31 | 33 |
| Subtotal | 3 | 35 | 38 |
P = 0.35
KRAS mutation and Type A/B MSI
| Type A | Type B | Subtotal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRAS | |||
| Mutant | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Wild type | 5 | 28 | 33 |
| Subtotal | 8 | 30 | 38 |
P = 0.05