| Literature DB >> 26298771 |
Mohamed Ali Mosrati1, Kerstin Willander2, Ingrid Jakobsen Falk3, Monica Hermanson4, Martin Höglund5, Dick Stockelberg6, Yuan Wei6, Kourosh Lotfi3,7, Peter Söderkvist1.
Abstract
Telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (TERT) promoter mutations are identified in many malignancies but not in hematological malignancies. Here we analyzed TERT and protection of telomeres 1 gene (POT1) mutations, and four different TERT SNVs in 226 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 806 healthy individuals in a case referent design, where also overall survival was assessed. A significant association for increased risk of AML was found for TERT SNVs, rs2853669 (OR = 2.45, p = 0.00015) and rs2736100 (OR = 1.5, p = 0.03). The overall survival for patients with CC genotype of rs2853669 was significantly shorter compared to those with TT or TC genotypes (p = 0.036 and 0.029 respectively). The influence of TERT rs2853669 CC on survival was confirmed in multivariable Cox regression analysis as an independent risk biomarker in addition to high risk group, higher age and treatment. No hot spot TERT promoter mutations at -228C > T or -250C > T or POT1 mutations could be identified in this AML cohort. We show that rs2853669 CC may be a risk factor for the development of AML that may also be used as a prognostic marker to identify high risk normal karyotype-AML (NK-AML) patients, for treatment guidance.Entities:
Keywords: AML; SNV; TERT; prognostic markers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26298771 PMCID: PMC4694818 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Genotype distribution of the different polymorphisms in AML patients and normal control population investigated in the study and their association with AML susceptibility
| Polymorphisms | AML n (%) | Controls | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2853669 | ||||
| TT | 89 (39.38) | 373 (47.88) | ||
| TC | 99 (43.8) | 341 (43.77) | 1.21 (0.88 – 1.67) | 0.13 |
| CC | 38 (16.81) | 65(8.34) | 2.45 (1.54 – 3.88) | |
| TC + CC | 137 | 406 | 1.41 (1.04 – 1.91) | 0.01 |
| Total | 226 | 779 | ||
| rs10069690 | ||||
| CC | 118 (52.21) | 409 (53.32) | ||
| CT | 93 (41.15) | 319 (41.60) | 1.01 (0.74 – 1.37) | 0.5 |
| TT | 15 (6.63) | 39 (4.68) | 1.33 (0.71 – 2.5) | 0.22 |
| CT + TT | 108 | 358 | 1.04 (0.77 – 1.4) | 0.41 |
| Total | 226 | 767 | ||
| rs2736100 | ||||
| AA | 48 (21.23) | 201 (25.5) | ||
| AC | 113 (50) | 406 (51.53) | 1.16 (0.79 – 1.7) | 0.24 |
| CC | 65 (28.76) | 181 (22.97) | 1.5 (0.98 – 2.29) | |
| AC + CC | 178 | 587 | 1.26 (0.88 – 1.81) | 0.1 |
| Total | 226 | 788 | ||
| rs4246742 | ||||
| TT | 156 (69.02) | 520 (66.41) | ||
| TA | 65 (28.76) | 240 (30.66) | 0.9 (0.65 – 1.25) | 0.29 |
| AA | 05 (2.21) | 23 (2.93) | 0.72 (0.27 – 1.93) | 0.35 |
| TA + AA | 70 | 263 | 0.88 (0.64 – 1.22) | 0.25 |
| Total | 226 | 783 |
Figure 1TERT gene, SNVs localization and disequilibrium
Localization of TERT SNVs, SNV1 (rs4246742), SNV2 (rs10069690), SNV3 (rs2736100) located at introns 8, 4 and 2 respectively and SNV 4 (rs2853669) located at the promoter region. (HapMap Data Rel 28/phase II+III, October 2010, on NCBI B36 assembly, dbSNP b126) A. Linkage disequilibrium showed a modest linkage between rs2853669 and rs2736100. (HaploView version 4.2) B.
Figure 2Differences in overall survival (OS) depending on TERT rs2853669 genotypes
In entire group and in NK-AML group homozygous CC genotype was significantly associated with a shorter OS A. and B. In FLT3-ITD-positive patients, homozygous CC genotype was significantly associated with a shorter OS C. the mean OS was 4.6 vs. 11.8 and 12.6 months for CC vs. TT and TC genotype, respectively, p < 0.001, D. The same result was found for NPM1 mutated patients, the mean OS was 5.4 vs. 18.4 and 13.8 months CC vs. TT and TC respectively p < 0.001.
Cox regression of overall survival in entire AML cohort
| HR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.03 | 1.01 – 1.05 | |
| Risk group | |||
| • *Intermediate risk | 1.76 | 0.92 – 3.37 | |
| • *High risk | 3.23 | 1.51 – 6.91 | |
| TERT rs2853669 C/T | 1.35 | 0.87 – 2.10 | 0.110 |
| TERT rs2853669 C/C | 1.74 | 1.03 – 2.94 | |
| Treatment | 0.5 | 0.29 – 0.84 |
Compared to low risk,
Compared to T/T
Chemo + allo-SCT compared to chemo only
*Intermediate risk: FLT3-ITD positive/NPM1 mutation positive or FLT3-ITD negative/NPM1 mutation negative or FLT3-ITD negative/monoallelic and or CEBPA wild type patients, *High risk: FLT3-ITD positive/NPM1 mutation negative NK-AML patients, *Low risk: FLT3-ITD negative/NPM1 mutation positive or FLT3-ITD negative/biallelic CEBPA mutation patients.
Cox regression of overall survival in NK-AML patients
| HR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.03 | 1.01 – 1.06 | |
| Risk group | |||
| • *NK-intermediate risk | 1.49 | 0.77 – 2.87 | 0.22 |
| • *NK-high risk | 2.32 | 0.94 – 5.67 | 0.061 |
| TERT rs2853669 C/T | 1.22 | 0.75 – 2 | 0.40 |
| TERT rs2853669 C/C | 2.08 | 1.11 – 3.88 | |
| Treatment | 0.56 | 0.3 – 1.02 | 0.061 |
Compared to low risk
Compared to T/T
Chemo + allo-SCT compared to chemo only
Cox regression of overall survival in aberrant AML karyotype
| HR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.04 | 1.001 – 1.086 | |
| Risk group | |||
| • *Aberrant K-intermediate risk | 1.49 | 0.77 – 2.87 | 0.235 |
| • *Aberrant K-high risk | 2.46 | 0.92 – 6.58 | 0.073 |
| TERT rs2853669 C/T | 1.22 | 0.75 – 2 | 0.409 |
| TERT rs2853669 C/C | 0.8 | 0.22 – 2.89 | 0.736 |
| Treatment | 0.34 | 0.1 – 1.16 | 0.086 |
Compared to low risk
Compared to T/T
Chemo + allo-SCT compared to chemo only
AML patient characteristics
| AML patient characteristics | Total |
|---|---|
| Male | 124 (54.86%) |
| Female | 102 (45.13%) |
| 57.7 (18–81) | |
| FLT3 wild type | 160 (70.79%) |
| FLT3 mutated | 61 (26.99%) |
| Not determined | 5 (2.21%) |
| NPM1 wild type | 147 (65.04%) |
| NPM1 mutated | 72 (31.85%) |
| Not determined | 7 (12.04%) |
| Monoallelic | 29 (12.83%) |
| Biallelic | 2 (0.88%) |
| | 169 (74.77%) |
| NK-low risk | 31 (13.71%) |
| NK-intermediate risk | 121 (53.53%) |
| NK-high risk | 17 (7.52%) |
| | 43 (19.02%) |
| Aberrant -low risk | 5 (2.21%) |
| Aberrant -intermediate risk | 21 (9.29%) |
| Aberrant -high risk | 17 (7.52%) |
| | 14 (6.19%) |
| Dnr + AraC | 163 (72.12%) |
| Ida + AraC | 20 (8.85%) |
| Ida + AraC + CdA | 15 (6.63%) |
| AraC | 10 (4.42%) |
| Dnr + AraC + 6-TG | 4 (1.76%) |
| Dnr + mylotarg | 2 (0.88%) |
| Dnr + AraC + Mitox | 2 (0.88%) |
| Others | 10 (4.42%) |
| CR | 167 (73.89%) |
| Non-CR | 32 (11.16%) |
| Not evaluated | 27 (11.94%) |
Dnr = Daunorubicine; AraC = Cytarabine; 6-TG = 6-thioguanine; Ida = Idarubicine; Cda = Cladribine; Mitox = Mitoxantrone; mylotarg = Gemtuzumab ozogamicin
CR = complete remission