Literature DB >> 26298704

Survey of otorhinolaryngologists on their clinical examinations performed in patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing.

Sebastian Plößl1, Beatrice Herzog2, Alexander Glien3, Stefan Plontke3, Michael Herzog3.   

Abstract

There is currently no standardized ear, nose, and throat (ENT) clinical examination for patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). As a result, there are large inter-individual differences in the examinations due to an inadequate estimation of the relevance of certain anatomic sites. We aimed to identify which examinations/dynamic tests are considered most relevant by German ENT physicians. A questionnaire was designed, evaluating 23 anatomic sites/dynamic tests of the upper aero-digestive tract. The questionnaire was sent to all German ENT departments (n = 153), including universities and other tertiary or secondary referral centers, by postal mail. In addition, almost all private ENT specialists registered with the German professional association (n = 2496) were contacted via e-mail. Participants assessed how often they examined the sites/dynamic tests, subjective importance, and the impact on the therapeutic procedure. A mean score of relevance (mSOR) was generated (minimum score 1; maximum score 75) from these three items. The response rate for hospitals was 58.8 %; while, it was 4.1 % for ENT specialists in private practice. Therefore, the total response rate was 7.3 %. Of the 23 assessed items, some showed a high overall relevance, such as the tonsils (mSOR 64.75), webbing (mSOR 58.14), uvula (mSOR 55.12), or tongue base (mSOR 53.99). Other examinations, such as simulated snoring (mSOR 19.34) or the Mueller maneuver (mSOR 18.98), were estimated as less relevant. Our data reflect the assessment of German otorhinolaryngologists on the clinical examination of SDB patients. The results should be considered as a basis for compiling a standardized procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical examination; OSA; Otorhinolaryngology; Relevance; Snoring

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26298704     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3748-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  27 in total

Review 1.  Current opinions and clinical practice in the titration of oral appliances in the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Marijke Dieltjens; Olivier M Vanderveken; Paul H Van de Heyning; Marc J Braem
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 11.609

2.  Observation of the mechanism of snoring using sleep nasendoscopy.

Authors:  S J Quinn; N Daly; P D Ellis
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1995-08

3.  A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study.

Authors:  S R Mallampati; S P Gatt; L D Gugino; S P Desai; B Waraksa; D Freiberger; P L Liu
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-07

4.  Sleep endoscopy versus modified Mallampati score in sleep apnea and snoring.

Authors:  Cindy den Herder; Harm van Tinteren; Nico de Vries
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  The prognostic value of simulated snoring in awake patients with suspected sleep-disordered breathing: introduction of a new technique of examination.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Till Metz; Andreas Schmidt; Thomas Bremert; Beatrice Venohr; Werner Hosemann; Holger Kaftan
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Clinical staging for sleep-disordered breathing.

Authors:  Michael Friedman; Hani Ibrahim; Lee Bass
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Otorhinolaryngologic examination in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: the correlation between the severity of sleep disorder and physical examination.

Authors:  Baran Acar; Mehmet Ali Babademez; Hayriye Karabulut; Bülent Ciftçi; Emre Günbey; Riza Murat Karaşen
Journal:  Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct

8.  Predictive value of Müller maneuver, cephalometry and clinical features for the outcome of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Evaluation of predictive factors using discriminant analysis in 30 sleep apnea patients.

Authors:  N Petri; P Suadicani; G Wildschiødtz; J Bjørn-Jørgensen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 9.  Airway evaluation in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Boris A Stuck; Joachim T Maurer
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 11.609

10.  Nasal obstruction and high Mallampati score as risk factors for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Marcos Marques Rodrigues; Ralph Silveira Dibbern; Carla W Kruel Goulart
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.