Ulf Samuelsson1, Nina Lindell2, Marie Bladh3, Karin Åkesson4,5,6, Annelie Carlsson7, Ann Josefsson3. 1. Department of Paediatrics and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, S-581 85, Linköping, Sweden. ulf.samuelsson@regionostergotland.se. 2. Department of Paediatrics and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, S-581 85, Linköping, Sweden. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 4. Department of Paediatrics, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden. 5. Futurum - Academy for Health and Care, Jönköping, Sweden. 6. Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden. 7. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Some studies have revealed a relationship between Caesarean section (CS) and type 1 diabetes, while other studies have not. By using the Swedish paediatric quality register we investigated whether birth by CS is related to the risk of developing type 1 diabetes during childhood. METHODS: All children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes from 2000 to 2012 and included in the register (n = 9,376) were matched with four controls by year, day of birth, sex and county of birth from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. RESULTS: Overall, 13.5% of deliveries were by CS. By group, 14.7% of children who developed type 1 diabetes were delivered by CS compared with 13.3% of control children (p < 0.001). Mothers with diabetes more often gave birth by CS than mothers without diabetes (78.8% vs 12.7%, p < 0.001). In a logistic regression model adjusting for maternal age, maternal diabetes and BMI in early pregnancy, the OR for CS was 1.0. A child who developed type 1 diabetes and had a mother with type 1 diabetes at the time of delivery had the highest OR to have been born by CS. Children of mothers without diabetes, delivered by CS, had no increased risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Maternal diabetes was the strongest predictor of childhood diabetes (OR 3.4), especially if the mother had type 1 diabetes (OR 7.54). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: CS had no influence on the risk of type 1 diabetes during childhood or adolescence. However, maternal diabetes itself strongly increased the risk of offspring developing type 1 diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Some studies have revealed a relationship between Caesarean section (CS) and type 1 diabetes, while other studies have not. By using the Swedish paediatric quality register we investigated whether birth by CS is related to the risk of developing type 1 diabetes during childhood. METHODS: All children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes from 2000 to 2012 and included in the register (n = 9,376) were matched with four controls by year, day of birth, sex and county of birth from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. RESULTS: Overall, 13.5% of deliveries were by CS. By group, 14.7% of children who developed type 1 diabetes were delivered by CS compared with 13.3% of control children (p < 0.001). Mothers with diabetes more often gave birth by CS than mothers without diabetes (78.8% vs 12.7%, p < 0.001). In a logistic regression model adjusting for maternal age, maternal diabetes and BMI in early pregnancy, the OR for CS was 1.0. A child who developed type 1 diabetes and had a mother with type 1 diabetes at the time of delivery had the highest OR to have been born by CS. Children of mothers without diabetes, delivered by CS, had no increased risk of developing type 1 diabetes. Maternal diabetes was the strongest predictor of childhood diabetes (OR 3.4), especially if the mother had type 1 diabetes (OR 7.54). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: CS had no influence on the risk of type 1 diabetes during childhood or adolescence. However, maternal diabetes itself strongly increased the risk of offspring developing type 1 diabetes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Caesarean section; Epidemiology; Pregnancy; Sex; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Craig E Taplin; Maria E Craig; Margaret Lloyd; Claire Taylor; Patricia Crock; Martin Silink; Neville J Howard Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2005-09-05 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: John Penders; Carel Thijs; Cornelis Vink; Foekje F Stelma; Bianca Snijders; Ischa Kummeling; Piet A van den Brandt; Ellen E Stobberingh Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dörthe Brüggmann; Lena-Katharina Löhlein; Frank Louwen; David Quarcoo; Jenny Jaque; Doris Klingelhöfer; David A Groneberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Éadaoin M Butler; Valentina Chiavaroli; José G B Derraik; Celia P Grigg; Brooke C Wilson; Nicholas Walker; Justin M O'Sullivan; Wayne S Cutfield Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 1.817