Literature DB >> 26297741

The use of dose-response data in a margin of exposure approach to carcinogenic risk assessment for genotoxic chemicals in food.

Diane J Benford1.   

Abstract

Genotoxic substances are generally not permitted for deliberate use in food production. However, an appreciable number of known or suspected genotoxic substances occur unavoidably in food, e.g. from natural occurrence, environmental contamination and generation during cooking and processing. Over the past decade a margin of exposure (MOE) approach has increasingly been used in assessing the exposure to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. The MOE is defined as a reference point on the dose-response curve (e.g. a benchmark dose lower confidences limit derived from a rodent carcinogenicity study) divided by the estimated human intake. A small MOE indicates a higher concern than a very large MOE. Whilst the MOE cannot be directly equated to risk, it supports prioritisation of substances for further research or for possible regulatory action, and provides a basis for communicating to the public. So far, the MOE approach has been confined to substances for which carcinogenicity data are available. In the absence of carcinogenicity data, evidence of genotoxicity is used only in hazard identification. The challenge to the genetic toxicology community is to develop approaches for characterising risk to human health based on data from genotoxicity studies. In order to achieve wide acceptance, it would be important to further address the issues that have been discussed in the context of dose-response modelling of carcinogenicity data in order to assign levels of concern to particular MOE values, and also whether it is possible to make generic conclusions on how potency in genotoxicity assays relates to carcinogenic potency. © Crown copyright 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26297741     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gev064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  6 in total

1.  Occurrence of relevant mycotoxins in food commodities consumed in Chile.

Authors:  Claudia Foerster; Katherine Muñoz; Lorena Delgado-Rivera; Andrea Rivera; Sandra Cortés; Andrea Müller; Gabriel Arriagada; Catterina Ferreccio; Gisela Rios
Journal:  Mycotoxin Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.833

Review 2.  Local Acetaldehyde-An Essential Role in Alcohol-Related Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Mikko T Nieminen; Mikko Salaspuro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Health Risk Assessment on Hazardous Ingredients in Household Deodorizing Products.

Authors:  Minjin Lee; Joo-Hyon Kim; Daeyeop Lee; Jaewoo Kim; Hyunwoo Lim; Jungkwan Seo; Young-Kwon Park
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Comparing BMD-derived genotoxic potency estimations across variants of the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay.

Authors:  John W Wills; George E Johnson; Hannah L Battaion; Wout Slob; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Combined Assessment of Preschool Childrens' Exposure to Substances in Household Products.

Authors:  Joo-Hyon Kim; Kwangseol Seok
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Cancer potencies and margin of exposure used for comparative risk assessment of heated tobacco products and electronic cigarettes aerosols with cigarette smoke.

Authors:  Gregory Rodrigo; Guy Jaccard; Donatien Tafin Djoko; Alexandra Korneliou; Marco Esposito; Maxim Belushkin
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 5.153

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.