Literature DB >> 26297423

Application of fossa bone graft to stabilize stock total joint prosthesis in temporomandibular joint surgery.

Guo Bai1, Chi Yang2, Dongmei He3, Xiaohu Zhang1, Ahmed Abdelrehem1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a new glenoid fossa bone graft technique, and to evaluate its effect on the stability of stock fossa prosthesis implantation in total alloplastic joint replacement surgery.
METHODS: Eight patients who underwent total joint replacement surgery with a Biomet stock prosthesis (Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) from November 2013 to April 2014 were included in this study. ProPlan CMF 1.4 software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) was used to choose the prosthesis size and place it in the right position. The depth of the fossa was measured, and the osteotomy line was designed to cut the bone which overlapped the fossa prosthesis. A bone graft, taken from the bottom of the articular eminence or the condylar neck, was used to fill in the fossa and make a flat plane in combination with the residual eminence for the positioning of the fossa prosthesis. The stability of the fossa prosthesis was evaluated both intra-operatively and postoperatively with computed tomography (CT) scanning after at least 6 months of follow-up. The bone contact area of the fossa prosthesis and the volume of the grafted bone were measured.
RESULTS: Fossa prostheses were intra-operatively stable after bone grafting. All patients had stable occlusion after surgery and at follow-up. Postoperative measurement showed that the bone contact area with the fossa prosthesis increased from 52.8% to 88.5% after bone grafting. Postoperative CT measurements (at an average of 9 months after surgery) showed that the bone graft volume decreased by 11.1%.
CONCLUSION: Bone grafts in the glenoid fossa help to improve the stability of Biomet stock fossa prosthesis implantation.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomet standard total joint replacement system; Bone graft; Stability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26297423     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

1.  Alloplastic total joint replacement in management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Authors:  Ajoy Roychoudhury; Poonam Yadav; Ongkila Bhutia; Rohan Mane; Rahul Yadav; Devalina Goswami; Anson Jose
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-05-23

Review 2.  Total Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Poonam Yadav; Ajoy Roychoudhury; Rudra Deo Kumar; Ongkila Bhutia; Tsering Bhutia; Bhaskar Aggarwal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2021-08-18

3.  Simultaneous treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis with severe mandibular deficiency by standard TMJ prosthesis.

Authors:  YiHui Hu; LuZhu Zhang; DongMei He; Chi Yang; MinJie Chen; ShanYong Zhang; Hui Li; Edward Ellis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Clinical guidelines for total temporomandibular joint replacement.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yoda; Nobumi Ogi; Hiroyuki Yoshitake; Tetsuji Kawakami; Ritsuo Takagi; Kenichiro Murakami; Hidemichi Yuasa; Toshirou Kondoh; Kanchu Tei; Kenichi Kurita
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2020-04-15

5.  Morphological study of safe fixation region of temporomandibular joint prosthesis in Chinese northeast population with 3-dimensional computed tomographic image.

Authors:  Zhuan Zhong; Jialiang Sun; Zhentao Yu; Yingying Han; Chunyang Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.