Literature DB >> 26297254

Dual NRASQ61R and BRAFV600E mutation-specific immunohistochemistry completes molecular screening in melanoma samples in a routine practice.

Arnaud Uguen1, Paul Guéguen2, Delphine Legoupil3, Stéphanie Bouvier4, Sebastian Costa5, Sandrine Duigou6, Gilles Lemasson7, Françoise Ledé8, Bruno Sassolas9, Matthieu Talagas10, Claude Férec11, Cédric Le Maréchal12, Marc De Braekeleer13, Pascale Marcorelles14.   

Abstract

NRAS and BRAF mutational status has become mandatory to treat patients with metastatic melanomas. Mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) can help analyze challenging tumor samples. We report our experience integrating NRASQ61R (SP174) and BRAFV600E (VE1) IHC in routine practice in a cancer molecular genetic platform. All samples screened for BRAF and NRAS mutations during the year 2014 were analyzed by IHC and pyrosequencing, with an independent analysis of the 2 methods. Cases with first-line discordant results benefited from a complementary second-round IHC and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with a final interpretation taking into account the results of pyrosequencing, IHC, NGS, and quantification of the tumor cells. We analyzed 111 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded melanoma samples from 101 patients. Twenty-two and 11 samples were concordant for BRAFV600E and NRASQ61R mutations, respectively. Second-round analyses of 9 discordant and 1 molecularly inconclusive samples allowed conclusion in 4 further mutated samples (2 BRAFV600E and 2 NRASQ61R). A sample remained NRASQ61R IHC negative but NRASQ61R mutated with molecular methods. Overall, BRAFV600 and NRASQ61 mutation frequencies were 31.7% and 30.7%, respectively. When compared to molecular results, the sensitivity and specificity of IHC were 100% for BRAFV600E IHC and 92.3% and 98.9% for NRASQ61R IHC, respectively. IHC interpretation required a more stringent cutoff for BRAFV600E IHC than NRASQ61R to minimize false results. We conclude that NRASQ61R and BRAFV600E IHC coupled with NGS allow detection of mutations in melanoma challenging samples.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF; Immunohistochemistry; Melanoma; Molecular analysis; NRAS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26297254     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  3 in total

1.  Comment on: "Comparison of Five Different Assays for the Detection of BRAF Mutations in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma".

Authors:  Arnaud Uguen
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Is immunohistochemistry of BRAF V600E useful as a screening tool and during progression disease of melanoma patients?

Authors:  Laura Schirosi; Sabino Strippoli; Francesca Gaudio; Giusi Graziano; Ondina Popescu; Michele Guida; Giovanni Simone; Anita Mangia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  A qualitative transcriptional signature for predicting microsatellite instability status of right-sided Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Yelin Fu; Lishuang Qi; Wenbing Guo; Liangliang Jin; Kai Song; Tianyi You; Shuobo Zhang; Yunyan Gu; Wenyuan Zhao; Zheng Guo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.