BACKGROUND: The Apgar score is used worldwide for assessing the clinical condition and short-term prognosis of newborn infants. Evidence for a relationship with long-term educational outcomes is conflicting. We investigated whether Apgar score at 5 min after birth was associated with additional support needs (ASN) and educational attainment. METHODS: Data on pregnancy, delivery and later educational outcomes for children attending Scottish schools between 2006 and 2011 were collated by linking individual-level data from national educational and maternity databases. The relationship between Apgar score and overall ASN, type-specific ASN and educational attainment was assessed using binary, multinomial and generalised ordinal logistic regression models, respectively. Missing covariate data were imputed. RESULTS: Of the 751,369 children eligible, 9741 (1.3%) had a low or intermediate Apgar score and 49,962 (6.6%) had ASN. Low Apgar score was independently associated with overall ASN status (adjusted OR for Apgar ≤3, OR 1.52 95% CI 1.35 to 1.70), as well as ASN due to cognitive (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.47), sensory (OR 2.49 95% CI 1.66 to 3.73) and motor (OR 3.57, 95% CI 2.86 to 4.47) impairments. There was a dose-response relationship between Apgar score and overall ASN status: of those scoring 0-3, 10.1% had ASN, compared with 9.1% of those scoring 4-7 and 6.6% of those scoring 7-10. A low Apgar score was associated with lower educational attainment, but this was not robust to adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Apgar scores are associated with long-term as well as short-term prognoses, and with educational as well as clinical outcomes at the population level. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: The Apgar score is used worldwide for assessing the clinical condition and short-term prognosis of newborn infants. Evidence for a relationship with long-term educational outcomes is conflicting. We investigated whether Apgar score at 5 min after birth was associated with additional support needs (ASN) and educational attainment. METHODS: Data on pregnancy, delivery and later educational outcomes for children attending Scottish schools between 2006 and 2011 were collated by linking individual-level data from national educational and maternity databases. The relationship between Apgar score and overall ASN, type-specific ASN and educational attainment was assessed using binary, multinomial and generalised ordinal logistic regression models, respectively. Missing covariate data were imputed. RESULTS: Of the 751,369 children eligible, 9741 (1.3%) had a low or intermediate Apgar score and 49,962 (6.6%) had ASN. Low Apgar score was independently associated with overall ASN status (adjusted OR for Apgar ≤3, OR 1.52 95% CI 1.35 to 1.70), as well as ASN due to cognitive (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.47), sensory (OR 2.49 95% CI 1.66 to 3.73) and motor (OR 3.57, 95% CI 2.86 to 4.47) impairments. There was a dose-response relationship between Apgar score and overall ASN status: of those scoring 0-3, 10.1% had ASN, compared with 9.1% of those scoring 4-7 and 6.6% of those scoring 7-10. A low Apgar score was associated with lower educational attainment, but this was not robust to adjustment for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Apgar scores are associated with long-term as well as short-term prognoses, and with educational as well as clinical outcomes at the population level. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
Apgar score; Educational status; Neurodevelopment; Neurodisability; Special education
Authors: Michael Fleming; Catherine A Fitton; Markus F C Steiner; James S McLay; David Clark; Albert King; Robert S Lindsay; Daniel F Mackay; Jill P Pell Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michael Fleming; Catherine A Fitton; Markus F C Steiner; James S McLay; David Clark; Albert King; Daniel F Mackay; Jill P Pell Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Neda Razaz; Sven Cnattingius; Martina Persson; Kristina Tedroff; Sarka Lisonkova; K S Joseph Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Annette Evans; Frank Dunstan; David L Fone; Amrita Bandyopadhyay; Behnaz Schofield; Joanne C Demmler; Muhammad A Rahman; Ronan A Lyons; Shantini Paranjothy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 3.240