Bryan Hodson1, Gavin R Norton1, Hendrik L Booysen1, Moekanyi J Sibiya1, Andrew Raymond1, Muzi J Maseko1, Olebogeng H I Majane1, Elena Libhaber2, Pinhas Sareli1, Angela J Woodiwiss1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although several characteristics of aortic function, which are largely determined by age, predict outcomes beyond brachial blood pressure (BP), the extent to which brachial BP control accounts for age-related variations in aortic function is uncertain. We aimed to determine the extent to which brachial BP control in the general population (systolic/diastolic BP < 140/90 mm Hg) accounts for age-related aortic hemodynamic changes across the adult lifespan.
METHODS: Central aortic pulse pressure (PPc), backward wave pressure (Pb), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and PP amplification (PPamp) (applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software) were determined in 1,185 participants from a community sample (age >16 years; 36.4% uncontrolled BP).
RESULTS: With adjustments for distending pressure (mean arterial pressure, MAP), no increases in PPc, Pb, or PWV and decreases in PPamp were noted in those with an uncontrolled brachial BP younger than 50 years. In those older than 50 years with an uncontrolled brachial BP, MAP-adjusted aortic hemodynamic variables were only modestly different to those with a controlled brachial BP (PPc, 46±14 vs. 42±15 mm Hg, P < 0.02, Pb, 23±8 vs. 21±8 mm Hg, PWV, 8.42±3.21 vs. 8.19±3.37 m/second, PPamp, 1.21±0.17 vs. 1.21±0.14). Nonetheless, with adjustments for MAP, marked age-related increases in PPc, Pb, and PWV and decreases in PPamp were noted in those with uncontrolled and controlled brachial BP across the adult lifespan (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Brachial BP control in the general population fails to account for most distending pressure-independent, age-related changes in aortic hemodynamics across the adult lifespan. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2015. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
BACKGROUND: Although several characteristics of aortic function, which are largely determined by age, predict outcomes beyond brachial blood pressure (BP), the extent to which brachial BP control accounts for age-related variations in aortic function is uncertain. We aimed to determine the extent to which brachial BP control in the general population (systolic/diastolic BP < 140/90 mm Hg) accounts for age-related aortic hemodynamic changes across the adult lifespan.
METHODS: Central aortic pulse pressure (PPc), backward wave pressure (Pb), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and PP amplification (PPamp) (applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software) were determined in 1,185 participants from a community sample (age >16 years; 36.4% uncontrolled BP).
RESULTS: With adjustments for distending pressure (mean arterial pressure, MAP), no increases in PPc, Pb, or PWV and decreases in PPamp were noted in those with an uncontrolled brachial BP younger than 50 years. In those older than 50 years with an uncontrolled brachial BP, MAP-adjusted aortic hemodynamic variables were only modestly different to those with a controlled brachial BP (PPc, 46±14 vs. 42±15 mm Hg, P < 0.02, Pb, 23±8 vs. 21±8 mm Hg, PWV, 8.42±3.21 vs. 8.19±3.37 m/second, PPamp, 1.21±0.17 vs. 1.21±0.14). Nonetheless, with adjustments for MAP, marked age-related increases in PPc, Pb, and PWV and decreases in PPamp were noted in those with uncontrolled and controlled brachial BP across the adult lifespan (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Brachial BP control in the general population fails to account for most distending pressure-independent, age-related changes in aortic hemodynamics across the adult lifespan. © American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd 2015. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Entities:
Keywords:
age; aortic pulse pressure; central blood pressure; hypertension; reflected waves.
Mesh：
Year: 2015
PMID： 26297030 DOI： 10.1093/ajh/hpv140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Hypertens ISSN： 0895-7061 Impact factor: 2.689