M Powell-Bowns1, M S J Wilson2, A Mustafa3. 1. NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK. 2. Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK. michaelwilson3@nhs.net. 3. NHS Borders, Melrose, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pregnancy status, gynaecological history, date of last menstrual period and contraceptive use are documented in emergency female admissions of reproductive age admitted to general surgery. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted in the United Kingdom. POPULATION: Females of reproductive age (12-50 years) admitted as an emergency to general surgery with abdominal pain were considered in this study. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical notes of emergency female admissions with abdominal pain between January and September 2012. We recorded whether a pregnancy test result was documented (cycle 1). Results were analysed and a prompt added to the medical clerk-in document. We re-audited (cycle 2) between January and June 2013 looking for improvement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documented pregnancy status within 24 h of admission and prior to any surgical intervention. RESULTS: 100 case notes were reviewed in stage 1. 30 patients (30 %) had a documented pregnancy status. 32 (32 %), 25 (25 %) and 29 (29 %) had a documented gynaecology history, contraceptive use and date of last menstrual period (LMP), respectively. 24 patients underwent emergency surgery, 6 (25 %) had a documented pregnancy status prior to surgery. Of 50 patients reviewed in stage 2, 37 (75.0 %) had a documented pregnancy status (p < 0.001), with 41 (82 %) having both gynaecological history (p < 0.0001) and contraceptive use (p < 0.0001) documented. 40 patients (80 % had a documented LMP (p < 0.0001). 7 patients required surgery, of whom 6 (85.7 %) had a documented pregnancy test prior to surgery (p = 0.001). All pregnancy tests were negative. CONCLUSIONS: A simple prompt in the surgical admission document has significantly improved the documentation of pregnancy status and gynaecological history in our female patients, particularly in those who require surgical intervention. A number of patient safety concerns were addressed locally, but require a coordinated, interdisciplinary discussion and a national guideline. A minimum standard of care, in females of reproductive age, should include mandatory objective documentation of pregnancy status, whether or not they require surgical intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pregnancy status, gynaecological history, date of last menstrual period and contraceptive use are documented in emergency female admissions of reproductive age admitted to general surgery. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted in the United Kingdom. POPULATION: Females of reproductive age (12-50 years) admitted as an emergency to general surgery with abdominal pain were considered in this study. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of medical notes of emergency female admissions with abdominal pain between January and September 2012. We recorded whether a pregnancy test result was documented (cycle 1). Results were analysed and a prompt added to the medical clerk-in document. We re-audited (cycle 2) between January and June 2013 looking for improvement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documented pregnancy status within 24 h of admission and prior to any surgical intervention. RESULTS: 100 case notes were reviewed in stage 1. 30 patients (30 %) had a documented pregnancy status. 32 (32 %), 25 (25 %) and 29 (29 %) had a documented gynaecology history, contraceptive use and date of last menstrual period (LMP), respectively. 24 patients underwent emergency surgery, 6 (25 %) had a documented pregnancy status prior to surgery. Of 50 patients reviewed in stage 2, 37 (75.0 %) had a documented pregnancy status (p < 0.001), with 41 (82 %) having both gynaecological history (p < 0.0001) and contraceptive use (p < 0.0001) documented. 40 patients (80 % had a documented LMP (p < 0.0001). 7 patients required surgery, of whom 6 (85.7 %) had a documented pregnancy test prior to surgery (p = 0.001). All pregnancy tests were negative. CONCLUSIONS: A simple prompt in the surgical admission document has significantly improved the documentation of pregnancy status and gynaecological history in our female patients, particularly in those who require surgical intervention. A number of patient safety concerns were addressed locally, but require a coordinated, interdisciplinary discussion and a national guideline. A minimum standard of care, in females of reproductive age, should include mandatory objective documentation of pregnancy status, whether or not they require surgical intervention.
Authors: Roch Cantwell; Thomas Clutton-Brock; Griselda Cooper; Andrew Dawson; James Drife; Debbie Garrod; Ann Harper; Diana Hulbert; Sebastian Lucas; John McClure; Harry Millward-Sadler; James Neilson; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Jane Norman; Colm O'Herlihy; Margaret Oates; Judy Shakespeare; Michael de Swiet; Catherine Williamson; Valerie Beale; Marian Knight; Christopher Lennox; Alison Miller; Dharmishta Parmar; Jane Rogers; Anna Springett Journal: BJOG Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Richard L Kahn; Maureen A Stanton; Sarani Tong-Ngork; Gregory A Liguori; Chris R Edmonds; David S Levine Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: J Vujic; K Marsoner; A H Lipp-Pump; P Klaritsch; H J Mischinger; P Kornprat Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 3.007