H Luz McNaughton Reyes1, Vangie A Foshee2, Andra T Tharp3, Susan T Ennett2, Daniel J Bauer4. 1. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: mcnaught@email.unc.edu. 2. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 3. Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia; 4. Department of Psychology, L.L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Theoretic models suggest that associations between substance use and dating violence perpetration may vary in different social contexts, but few studies have examined this proposition. The current study examined whether social control and violence in the neighborhood, peer, and family contexts moderate the associations between substance use (heavy alcohol use, marijuana, and hard drug use) and adolescent physical dating violence perpetration. METHODS: Adolescents in the eighth, ninth, and tenth grades completed questionnaires in 2004 and again four more times until 2007 when they were in the tenth, 11th, and 12th grades. Multilevel analysis was used to examine interactions between each substance and measures of neighborhood, peer, and family social control and violence as within-person (time-varying) predictors of physical dating violence perpetration across eighth through 12th grade (N=2,455). Analyses were conducted in 2014. RESULTS: Physical dating violence perpetration increased at time points when heavy alcohol and hard drug use were elevated; these associations were weaker when neighborhood social control was higher and stronger when family violence was higher. Also, the association between heavy alcohol use and physical dating violence perpetration was weaker when teens had more-prosocial peer networks and stronger when teens' peers reported more physical dating violence. CONCLUSIONS: Linkages between substance use and physical dating violence perpetration depend on substance use type and levels of contextual violence and social control. Prevention programs that address substance use-related dating violence should consider the role of social contextual variables that may condition risk by influencing adolescents' aggression propensity.
INTRODUCTION: Theoretic models suggest that associations between substance use and dating violence perpetration may vary in different social contexts, but few studies have examined this proposition. The current study examined whether social control and violence in the neighborhood, peer, and family contexts moderate the associations between substance use (heavy alcohol use, marijuana, and hard drug use) and adolescent physical dating violence perpetration. METHODS: Adolescents in the eighth, ninth, and tenth grades completed questionnaires in 2004 and again four more times until 2007 when they were in the tenth, 11th, and 12th grades. Multilevel analysis was used to examine interactions between each substance and measures of neighborhood, peer, and family social control and violence as within-person (time-varying) predictors of physical dating violence perpetration across eighth through 12th grade (N=2,455). Analyses were conducted in 2014. RESULTS: Physical dating violence perpetration increased at time points when heavy alcohol and hard drug use were elevated; these associations were weaker when neighborhood social control was higher and stronger when family violence was higher. Also, the association between heavy alcohol use and physical dating violence perpetration was weaker when teens had more-prosocial peer networks and stronger when teens' peers reported more physical dating violence. CONCLUSIONS: Linkages between substance use and physical dating violence perpetration depend on substance use type and levels of contextual violence and social control. Prevention programs that address substance use-related dating violence should consider the role of social contextual variables that may condition risk by influencing adolescents' aggression propensity.
Authors: Emily F Rothman; Renee M Johnson; Robin Young; Janice Weinberg; Deborah Azrael; Beth E Molnar Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Vangie A Foshee; Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes; Susan T Ennett; Chirayath Suchindran; Jasmine P Mathias; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Karl E Bauman; Thad S Benefield Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Emily F Rothman; Gregory L Stuart; Michael Winter; Na Wang; Deborah J Bowen; Judith Bernstein; Robert Vinci Journal: J Interpers Violence Date: 2012-04-30
Authors: Rebecca Meiksin; Elizabeth Allen; Joanna Crichton; Gemma S Morgan; Christine Barter; Diana Elbourne; Kate Hunt; G J Melendez-Torres; Steve Morris; H Luz Mc Naughton Reyes; Joanna Sturgess; Bruce Taylor; Honor Young; Rona Campbell; Chris Bonell Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2019-01-22