Renee M Johnson1, Elizabeth M Parker2, Jenny Rinehart2, Jennifer Nail2, Emily F Rothman3. 1. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland;. Electronic address: rjohnson@jhu.edu. 2. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland; 3. Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The purpose of this review is to summarize the empirical research on neighborhood-level factors and dating violence among adolescents and emerging adults to guide future research and practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In 2015, a total of 20 articles were identified through a search of the literature using PubMed. Eligible articles included those that (1) had been published in a peer-reviewed journal since 2005; (2) reported a measure of association between at least one neighborhood-level factor and dating violence; and (3) had a study population of youth aged <26 years. We abstracted information about the studies, including measurement of dating violence and neighborhood factors, and measures of effect. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Results were summarized into three categories based on the aspect of neighborhood that was the focus of the work: demographic and structural characteristics (n=11); neighborhood disorder (n=12); and social disorganization (n=8). There was some evidence to suggest that neighborhood disadvantage is associated with dating violence, but very little evidence to suggest that residence characteristics (e.g., racial heterogeneity) are associated with dating violence. Results do suggest that perceived neighborhood disorder is associated with physical dating violence perpetration, but do not suggest that it is associated with physical dating violence victimization. Social control and community connectedness are both associated with dating violence, but findings on collective efficacy are mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Existing research suggests that neighborhood factors may be associated with dating violence. However, there is a limited body of research on the neighborhood context of dating violence, and more rigorous research is needed.
CONTEXT: The purpose of this review is to summarize the empirical research on neighborhood-level factors and dating violence among adolescents and emerging adults to guide future research and practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In 2015, a total of 20 articles were identified through a search of the literature using PubMed. Eligible articles included those that (1) had been published in a peer-reviewed journal since 2005; (2) reported a measure of association between at least one neighborhood-level factor and dating violence; and (3) had a study population of youth aged <26 years. We abstracted information about the studies, including measurement of dating violence and neighborhood factors, and measures of effect. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Results were summarized into three categories based on the aspect of neighborhood that was the focus of the work: demographic and structural characteristics (n=11); neighborhood disorder (n=12); and social disorganization (n=8). There was some evidence to suggest that neighborhood disadvantage is associated with dating violence, but very little evidence to suggest that residence characteristics (e.g., racial heterogeneity) are associated with dating violence. Results do suggest that perceived neighborhood disorder is associated with physical dating violence perpetration, but do not suggest that it is associated with physical dating violence victimization. Social control and community connectedness are both associated with dating violence, but findings on collective efficacy are mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Existing research suggests that neighborhood factors may be associated with dating violence. However, there is a limited body of research on the neighborhood context of dating violence, and more rigorous research is needed.
Authors: Emily F Rothman; Renee M Johnson; Robin Young; Janice Weinberg; Deborah Azrael; Beth E Molnar Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Vangie A Foshee; Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes; Susan T Ennett; Chirayath Suchindran; Jasmine P Mathias; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Karl E Bauman; Thad S Benefield Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Martha W Waller; Bonita J Iritani; Sharon L Christ; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Kathryn E Moracco; Robert L Flewelling Journal: Health Place Date: 2013-01-17 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Bonita J Iritani; Martha W Waller; Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Kathryn E Moracco; Sharon L Christ; Robert L Flewelling Journal: J Fam Violence Date: 2013-07-01
Authors: H Luz McNaughton Reyes; Laurie M Graham; May S Chen; Deborah Baron; Andrew Gibbs; Alison K Groves; Lusajo Kajula; Sarah Bowler; Suzanne Maman Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2020-11-19