Literature DB >> 26296433

Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.

Sima Djalali1, Nadine Ursprung2, Thomas Rosemann2, Oliver Senn2, Ryan Tandjung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The adoption and use of health information technology (IT) continues to grow around the globe. In Switzerland, the government nor professional associations have to this day provided incentives for health IT adoption.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to assess the proportion of physicians who are routinely working with electronic health data and describe to what extent physicians exchange electronic health data with peers and other health care providers. Additionally, we aim to estimate the effect of physicians' attitude towards health IT on the adoption of electronic workflows.
METHODS: Between May and July 2013, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1200 practice based physicians in Switzerland. Respondents were asked to report on their technical means and where applicable their paper-based workarounds to process laboratory data, examination results, referral letters and physician's letters. Physicians' view of barriers and facilitators towards health IT use was determined by a composite score.
RESULTS: A response rate of 57.1% (n=685) was reached. The sample was considered to be representative for physicians in Swiss ambulatory care. 35.2% of the respondents documented patients' health status with the help of a longitudinal semi-structured electronic text record generated by one or more encounters in the practice. Depending on the task within a workflow, around 11-46% of the respondents stated to rely on electronic workflow practices to process laboratory and examination data and dispatch referral notes and physician's letters. The permanent use of electronic workflow processes was infrequent. Instead, respondents reported paper-based workarounds affecting specific tasks within a workflow. Physicians' attitude towards health IT was significantly associated with the adoption of electronic workflows (OR 1.04-1.31, p<0.05), but the effect sizes of factors related to the working environment (e.g., regional factors, medical specialty, type of practice) were larger.
CONCLUSION: At present, only a few physicians in Swiss ambulatory care routinely work with electronic health data. Until more of their peers participate in electronic exchange of structured clinical information, most physicians will continue to stay in paper-based systems and workarounds. The survey found that physicians with a positive attitude towards health IT were more likely to adopt electronic workflows, but the impact is minor. It will likely be necessary to introduce financial incentives and develop national standards in order to promote the adoption by a critical mass of practicing clinicians.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory care; Barriers; Electronic health record; Health information technology; Implementation; Switzerland

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26296433     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  6 in total

Review 1.  Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Michael Z Huang; Candace J Gibson; Amanda L Terry
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Primary care physicians' attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework.

Authors:  Amy O'Donnell; Eileen Kaner; Caroline Shaw; Catherine Haighton
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems and the Revised Sociotechnical Electronic Health Record Workaround Analysis Framework: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Vincent Blijleven; Florian Hoxha; Monique Jaspers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.076

4.  Assessing author willingness to enter study information into structured data templates as part of the manuscript submission process: A pilot study.

Authors:  A Amina Wilkins; Paul Whaley; Amanda S Persad; Ingrid L Druwe; Janice S Lee; Michele M Taylor; Andrew J Shapiro; Natalie Blanton Southard; Courtney Lemeris; Kristina A Thayer
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-03-11

5.  Effect of a patient-centred deprescribing procedure in older multimorbid patients in Swiss primary care - A cluster-randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Stefan Zechmann; Oliver Senn; Fabio Valeri; Stefan Essig; Christoph Merlo; Thomas Rosemann; Stefan Neuner-Jehle
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Using a Clinical Workflow Analysis to Enhance eHealth Implementation Planning: Tutorial and Case Study.

Authors:  Stephanie Staras; Justin S Tauscher; Natalie Rich; Esaa Samarah; Lindsay A Thompson; Michelle M Vinson; Michael J Muszynski; Elizabeth A Shenkman
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.773

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.