Binglan Zhang1, Zeming Mo1, Wei Du1, Yan Wang2, Lei Liu3, Yuquan Wei1. 1. The Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District, Chengdu, China. 3. The Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: liuleihx@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical treatment outcomes and late toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with those obtained with two-dimensional radiation therapy (2D-RT) or three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched all the eligible studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Embase. The meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratio (OR) for overall survival (OS), tumor local control (LC), and late toxicities. RESULTS: A total of eight studies met the criteria to perform a meta-analysis including 3570 participants, with 1541 patients in the IMRT group and 2029 in the 2D-RT or 3D-CRT group. The IMRT group was associated with a better 5-year overall survival (OR=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.87; p=0.0001), and tumor local control (LC) (OR=1.94; 95% CI 1.53-2.46; p<0.00001). According to CTCAE v3.0 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and RTOG/EORTC (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), the incidence of late xerostomia in those who received IMRT was significantly lower than that of the control group (OR=0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46; p=0.0004). In addition, the radiation-induced chronic toxicities rate of trismus and temporal lobe neuropathy (TLN) were also significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the control group (OR=0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.83; p=0.03; OR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28-0.69; p=0.0003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that IMRT mayobtain a better antitumor effect, and significantly decrease the incidence of radiation-induced late toxicities in patients with NPC.
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical treatment outcomes and late toxicities of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with those obtained with two-dimensional radiation therapy (2D-RT) or three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched all the eligible studies from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, and Embase. The meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratio (OR) for overall survival (OS), tumor local control (LC), and late toxicities. RESULTS: A total of eight studies met the criteria to perform a meta-analysis including 3570 participants, with 1541 patients in the IMRT group and 2029 in the 2D-RT or 3D-CRT group. The IMRT group was associated with a better 5-year overall survival (OR=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.87; p=0.0001), and tumor local control (LC) (OR=1.94; 95% CI 1.53-2.46; p<0.00001). According to CTCAE v3.0 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) and RTOG/EORTC (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), the incidence of late xerostomia in those who received IMRT was significantly lower than that of the control group (OR=0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46; p=0.0004). In addition, the radiation-induced chronic toxicities rate of trismus and temporal lobe neuropathy (TLN) were also significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the control group (OR=0.18; 95% CI 0.04-0.83; p=0.03; OR=0.44; 95% CI 0.28-0.69; p=0.0003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that IMRT mayobtain a better antitumor effect, and significantly decrease the incidence of radiation-induced late toxicities in patients with NPC.
Authors: Terence T Sio; Huei-Kai Lin; Qiuling Shi; G Brandon Gunn; Charles S Cleeland; J Jack Lee; Mike Hernandez; Pierre Blanchard; Nikhil G Thaker; Jack Phan; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; William H Morrison; C David Fuller; Tito R Mendoza; Radhe Mohan; Xin Shelley Wang; Steven J Frank Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Mark D Krailo; Matthew J Krasin; Li Huang; M Beth McCarville; John Hicks; Farzana Pashankar; Alberto S Pappo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kenneth C W Wong; Edwin P Hui; Kwok-Wai Lo; Wai Kei Jacky Lam; David Johnson; Lili Li; Qian Tao; Kwan Chee Allen Chan; Ka-Fai To; Ann D King; Brigette B Y Ma; Anthony T C Chan Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: J Boustani; A Ruffier; A Moya-Plana; Y Tao; F Nguyen; C Even; C Berthold; O Casiraghi; S Temam; P Blanchard Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 3.621