Jef Vanparijs1, Luc Int Panis2, Romain Meeusen3, Bas de Geus1. 1. Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. 2. Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Mol, Belgium; Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium. 3. Department of Human Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. Electronic address: romain.meeusen@vub.ac.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cycling, as an active mode of transportation, has well-established health benefits. However, the safety of cyclists in traffic remains a major concern. In-depth studies of potential risk factors and safety outcomes are needed to ensure the most appropriate actions are taken to improve safety. However, the lack of reliable exposure data hinders meaningful analysis and interpretation. In this paper, we review the bicycle safety literature reporting different methods for measuring cycling exposure and discuss their findings. METHODS: A literature search identified studies on bicycle safety that included a description of how cycling exposure was measured, and what exposure units were used (e.g. distance, time, trips). Results were analyzed based on whether retrospective or prospective measurement of exposure was used, and whether safety outcomes controlled for exposure. RESULTS: We analyzed 20 papers. Retrospective studies were dominated by major bicycle accidents, whereas the prospective studies included minor and major bicycle accidents. Retrospective studies indicated higher incidence rates (IR) of accidents for men compared to women, and an increased risk of injury for cyclists aged 50 years or older. There was a lack of data for cyclists younger than 18 years. The risk of cycling accidents increased when riding in the dark. Wearing visible clothing or a helmet, or having more cycling experience did not reduce the risk of being involved in an accident. Better cyclist-driver awareness and more interaction between car driver and cyclists, and well maintained bicycle-specific infrastructure should improve bicycle safety. CONCLUSION: The need to include exposure in bicycle safety research is increasingly recognized, but good exposure data are often lacking, which makes results hard to interpret and compare. Studies including exposure often use a retrospective research design, without including data on minor bicycle accidents, making it difficult to compare safety levels between age categories or against different types of infrastructure. Future research should focus more on children and adolescents, as this age group is a vulnerable population and is underrepresented in the existing literature.
BACKGROUND: Cycling, as an active mode of transportation, has well-established health benefits. However, the safety of cyclists in traffic remains a major concern. In-depth studies of potential risk factors and safety outcomes are needed to ensure the most appropriate actions are taken to improve safety. However, the lack of reliable exposure data hinders meaningful analysis and interpretation. In this paper, we review the bicycle safety literature reporting different methods for measuring cycling exposure and discuss their findings. METHODS: A literature search identified studies on bicycle safety that included a description of how cycling exposure was measured, and what exposure units were used (e.g. distance, time, trips). Results were analyzed based on whether retrospective or prospective measurement of exposure was used, and whether safety outcomes controlled for exposure. RESULTS: We analyzed 20 papers. Retrospective studies were dominated by major bicycle accidents, whereas the prospective studies included minor and major bicycle accidents. Retrospective studies indicated higher incidence rates (IR) of accidents for men compared to women, and an increased risk of injury for cyclists aged 50 years or older. There was a lack of data for cyclists younger than 18 years. The risk of cycling accidents increased when riding in the dark. Wearing visible clothing or a helmet, or having more cycling experience did not reduce the risk of being involved in an accident. Better cyclist-driver awareness and more interaction between car driver and cyclists, and well maintained bicycle-specific infrastructure should improve bicycle safety. CONCLUSION: The need to include exposure in bicycle safety research is increasingly recognized, but good exposure data are often lacking, which makes results hard to interpret and compare. Studies including exposure often use a retrospective research design, without including data on minor bicycle accidents, making it difficult to compare safety levels between age categories or against different types of infrastructure. Future research should focus more on children and adolescents, as this age group is a vulnerable population and is underrepresented in the existing literature.
Authors: Christopher N Morrison; Andrew G Rundle; Charles C Branas; Stanford Chihuri; Christina Mehranbod; Guohua Li Journal: Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-18
Authors: Michael D Garber; W Dana Flanders; Kari E Watkins; Felipe Lobelo; Michael R Kramer; Lauren E McCullough Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Evi Dons; Thomas Götschi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Audrey de Nazelle; Esther Anaya; Ione Avila-Palencia; Christian Brand; Tom Cole-Hunter; Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen; Sonja Kahlmeier; Michelle Laeremans; Natalie Mueller; Juan Pablo Orjuela; Elisabeth Raser; David Rojas-Rueda; Arnout Standaert; Erik Stigell; Tina Uhlmann; Regine Gerike; Luc Int Panis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Regine Gerike; Audrey de Nazelle; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Luc Int Panis; Esther Anaya; Ione Avila-Palencia; Florinda Boschetti; Christian Brand; Tom Cole-Hunter; Evi Dons; Ulf Eriksson; Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen; Sonja Kahlmeier; Michelle Laeremans; Natalie Mueller; Juan Pablo Orjuela; Francesca Racioppi; Elisabeth Raser; David Rojas-Rueda; Christian Schweizer; Arnout Standaert; Tina Uhlmann; Sandra Wegener; Thomas Götschi Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 2.692