Daniel Golovko1, Dmitriy Kedrin2,3, Ömer H Yilmaz2,4, Jatin Roper1,2. 1. a 1 Tufts Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Molecular Oncology Research Institute , Boston, MA 02111, USA jroper@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. 2. b 2 MIT, The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Department of Biology , Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 3. c 3 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Division of Gastroenterology , Boston, MA 02114, USA. 4. d 4 Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Pathology , Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Despite increased screening rates and advances in targeted therapy, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. CRC models that recapitulate key features of human disease are essential to the development of novel and effective therapeutics. Classic methods of modeling CRC such as human cell lines and xenograft mice, while useful for many applications, carry significant limitations. Recently developed in vitro and in vivo models overcome some of these deficiencies and thus can be utilized to better model CRC for mechanistic and translational research. AREAS COVERED: The authors review established models of in vitro cell culture and describe advances in organoid culture for studying normal and malignant intestine. They also discuss key features of classic xenograft models and describe other approaches for in vivo CRC research, including patient-derived xenograft, carcinogen-induced, orthotopic transplantation and transgenic mouse models. We also describe mouse models of metastatic CRC. EXPERT OPINION: No single model is optimal for drug discovery in CRC. Genetically engineered models overcome many limitations of xenograft models. Three-dimensional organoids can be efficiently derived from both normal and malignant tissue for large-scale in vitro and in vivo (transplantation) studies and are thus a significant advance in CRC drug discovery.
INTRODUCTION:n class="Chemical">Despite increased screening rates and advances in targeted therapy, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality. CRC models that recapitulate key features of humandisease are essential to the development of novel and effective therapeutics. Classic methods of modeling CRC such as human cell lines and xenograft mice, while useful for many applications, carry significant limitations. Recently developed in vitro and in vivo models overcome some of these deficiencies and thus can be utilized to better model CRC for mechanistic and translational research. AREAS COVERED: The authors review established models of in vitro cell culture anddescribe advances in organoid culture for studying normal and malignant intestine. They also discuss key features of classic xenograft models anddescribe other approaches for in vivo CRC research, including patient-derived xenograft, carcinogen-induced, orthotopic transplantation and transgenic mouse models. We also describe mouse models of metastatic CRC. EXPERT OPINION: No single model is optimal for drug discovery in CRC. Genetically engineered models overcome many limitations of xenograft models. Three-dimensional organoids can be efficiently derived from both normal and malignant tissue for large-scale in vitro and in vivo (transplantation) studies and are thus a significant advance in CRC drug discovery.
Entities:
Keywords:
colorectal cancer mouse models; intestinal organoid; patient-derived xenograft; transgenic colorectal cancer mouse model
Authors: Jatin Roper; Mark J Sinnamon; Erin M Coffee; Peter Belmont; Lily Keung; Larissa Georgeon-Richard; Wei Vivian Wang; Anthony C Faber; Jihye Yun; Ömer H Yilmaz; Roderick T Bronson; Eric S Martin; Philip N Tsichlis; Kenneth E Hung Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2014-02-24 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Patty Trobridge; Sue Knoblaugh; M Kay Washington; Nina M Munoz; Karen D Tsuchiya; Andres Rojas; Xiaoling Song; Cornelia M Ulrich; Takehiko Sasazuki; Senji Shirasawa; William M Grady Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Huanhuan Joyce Chen; Jian Sun; Zhiliang Huang; Harry Hou; Myra Arcilla; Nikolai Rakhilin; Daniel J Joe; Jiahn Choi; Poornima Gadamsetty; Jeff Milsom; Govind Nandakumar; Randy Longman; Xi Kathy Zhou; Robert Edwards; Jonlin Chen; Kai Yuan Chen; Pengcheng Bu; Lihua Wang; Yitian Xu; Robert Munroe; Christian Abratte; Andrew D Miller; Zeynep H Gümüş; Michael Shuler; Nozomi Nishimura; Winfried Edelmann; Xiling Shen; Steven M Lipkin Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2015-05-25 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Jatin Roper; Tuomas Tammela; Adam Akkad; Mohammad Almeqdadi; Sebastian B Santos; Tyler Jacks; Ömer H Yilmaz Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Jatin Roper; Tuomas Tammela; Naniye Malli Cetinbas; Adam Akkad; Ali Roghanian; Steffen Rickelt; Mohammad Almeqdadi; Katherine Wu; Matthias A Oberli; Francisco J Sánchez-Rivera; Yoona K Park; Xu Liang; George Eng; Martin S Taylor; Roxana Azimi; Dmitriy Kedrin; Rachit Neupane; Semir Beyaz; Ewa T Sicinska; Yvelisse Suarez; James Yoo; Lillian Chen; Lawrence Zukerberg; Pekka Katajisto; Vikram Deshpande; Adam J Bass; Philip N Tsichlis; Jacqueline Lees; Robert Langer; Richard O Hynes; Jianzhu Chen; Arjun Bhutkar; Tyler Jacks; Ömer H Yilmaz Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Elaine M Glenny; Michael F Coleman; Erin D Giles; Elizabeth A Wellberg; Stephen D Hursting Journal: Annu Rev Nutr Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 11.848