Literature DB >> 26295788

Cervical cancer with paraaortic involvement: do patients truly benefit from tailored chemoradiation therapy? A retrospective study on 8 French centers.

Elodie Chantalat1, Fabien Vidal2, Pierre Leguevaque2, Benoît Lepage3, Patrice Mathevet4, Marion Deslandres5, Stéphanie Motton2.   

Abstract

We retrospectively studied the therapeutic significance of extended-field radiotherapy combined with concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy for the management of cervical carcinoma with paraaortic spread. Treatment response and survival outcomes were evaluated. One hundred and fifteen women were retrospectively studied. Radiological staging was conducted in 101 (87.8%) patients and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in 78 (67.8%). Patterns of treatment comprised chemoradiation therapy (100%), intracavitary brachytherapy (81.7%), completion surgery (60%) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4.3%). Four-year overall and disease-free survivals were 32.7% and 28.8%, respectively. Progression and relapse mostly involved the locoregional area and distant organs, rather than the paraaortic area. Advanced FIGO stage at baseline was the most significant prognostic factor (HR=3.02, p=0.01). Despite systematic extended-field chemoradiation therapy, paraaortic involvement in cervical cancer is associated with poor survival outcomes. The patterns of progression and recurrence suggest the existence of occult metastatic disease at presentation. Additional systemic treatment might thus be beneficial.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Extended-field radiotherapy; Neoadjuvant therapy; Para-aortic involvement; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26295788     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of para-aortic nodal irradiation in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Adela Poitevin Chacón; Jessica Chavez-Nogueda; Rubí Ramos-Prudencio; Michelle Aline Villavicencio-Queijeiro; Francisco Lozano-Ruiz
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 2.  Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariano Catello Di Donna; Vincenzo Giallombardo; Giuseppina Lo Balbo; Giuseppe Cucinella; Giulio Sozzi; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Antonino Abbate; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment.

Authors:  T S Shylasree; Lavanya Gurram; Ushashree Das
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

4.  The analysis of the long-term outcomes in elderly women treated for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Krzysztof Koper; Konrad Dziobek; Roman Makarewicz; Joanna Terlikiewicz; Magdalena Dutsch-Wicherek
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-10-31

5.  Comparison of outcomes and side effects for neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel followed by chemoradiation vs. chemoradiation alone in stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jing Li; Hua Liu; Ya Li; Jian Li; Lifei Shen; Wenqing Long; Chenmin Yang; Haoping Xu; Wenqi Xi; Rong Cai; Weiwei Feng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Fengying Qin; Huiting Pang; Tao Yu; Yahong Luo; Yue Dong
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.