| Literature DB >> 26295582 |
Longbin Huang1, Xiaofang Li1, Tuan A H Nguyen1.
Abstract
Elevated inorganic phosphate (Pi) concentrations in pore water of amended tailings under direct revegetation may cause toxicity in some native woody species but not native forbs or herb species, all of which are key constituents in target native plant communities for phytostabilizing base metal mine tailings. As a result, Pi sorption capacity has been quantified by a conventional batch procedure in three types of base metal mine tailings sampled from two copper (Cu)-lead (Pb)-zinc (Zn) mines, as the basis for Pi-fertiliser addition. It was found that the Pi-sorption capacity in the tailings and local soil was extremely high, far higher than highly weathered agricultural soils in literature, but similar to those of volcanic ash soils. The Langmuir P-sorption maximum was up to 7.72, 4.12, 4.02 and 3.62 mg P g-1 tailings, in the fresh tailings of mixed Cu-Pb-Zn streams (MIMTD7), the weathered tailings of mixed Cu-Pb-Zn streams (MIMTD5), EHM-TD (fresh Cu-stream, high magnetite content) and local soil (weathered shale and schist), respectively. Physicochemical factors highly correlated with the high Pi-sorption in the tailings were fine particle distribution, oxalate and dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractable Fe (FeO and Fed), oxalate-extractable Al and Mn, and the levels of soluble Cd and Zn, and total S and Fe. Large amounts of amorphous Fe oxides and oxyhydroxides may have been formed from the oxidation of pyritic materials and redox cycles of Fe-minerals (such as pyrite (FeS2), ankerite (Ca(Fe Mg)(CO3)2 and siderite (FeCO3), as indicated by the extractable FeO values. The likely formation of sparingly soluble Zn-phosphate in the Pb-Zn tailings containing high levels of Zn (from sphalerite ((Zn,Fe)S, ZnS, (Zn,Cd)S)) may substantially lower soluble Zn levels in the tailings through high rates of Pi-fertiliser addition. As a result, the possibility of P-toxicity in native plant species caused by the addition of soluble phosphate fertilizers would be minimal.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26295582 PMCID: PMC4546615 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Total element concentrations in the tailings and hillside soil samples.
The values are means of 3 replicates each, with standard deviations in the parentheses.
| Sample | Al (mg g-1) | As (mg kg-1) | Ca (mg g-1) | Cd (mg kg-1) | Fe (mg g-1) | P (mg kg-1) | S (mg g-1) | Mn (mg g-1) | Cu (mg kg-1) | Pb (mg kg-1) | Zn (mg kg-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 52.4 B | 95.1 | 10.3 C | 0.355B | 128 A | 973 A | 10.8 C | 1.64 A | 383 B | 19.3 C | 27.1C |
| (3.95) | (4.84) | (0.26) | (0.228) | (15.1) | (71) | (1.00) | (0.17) | (123) | (9.44) | (2.16) | |
|
| 5.01 D | 242 | 48.7 A | 8.74 C | 60.2 C | 308 B | 33.2 B | 1.61A | 1309 A | 1825 B | 2896 B |
| (0.50) | (8.78) | (0.88) | (0.44) | (2.06) | (21) | (0.22) | (0.06) | (32.3) | (23.5) | (114) | |
|
| 18.5 C | 1018 | 17.8 B | 27.5D | 109 B | 370 B | 64.8 A | 0.98 B | 1711A | 3902 A | 8504 A |
| (1.03) | (6.56) | (0.41) | (1.29) | (4.51) | (7.0) | (2.40) | (0.02) | (78.6) | (28.7) | (215) | |
|
| 66.0A | 8.76 | 4.19 D | 0.165A | 54.4 D | 104 C | 0.310 D | 0.39 C | 64.9 C | 37.6C | 64.2 C |
| (4.35) | (0.80) | (1.84) | (0.070) | (2.46) | (12) | (0.11) | (0.01) | (3.66) | (19.3) | (29.1) |
For the same element, different letters indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05.
Chemical forms of Al, Fe and Mn in tailings and Hillside soil samples.
In the table, AlO, FeO and MnO are oxalate-extractable Al, Fe and Mn (non-crystalline form). Ald, Fed and Mnd are dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extractable fractions (crystalline form). The values were means of 3 replicates per sample with standard deviation in the parentheses.
| Sample name | pHw(1:5) | AlO | Ald | FeO | Fed | MnO | Mnd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| 8.3 | 0.56 B (0.02) | 0.27 C (0.04) | 18.51 B (4.65) | 11.28 B (1.73) | 0.27 B (0.03) | 1.28 A (0.12) |
|
| 8.2 | 0.16 D (0.02) | 0.04 D (0.01) | 15.60B (2.50) | 13.88 AB (0.93) | 0.89 A (0.13) | 0.44 B (0.01) |
|
| 6.7 | 0.67 A (0.04) | 0.42 B (0.02) | 22.95 A (1.84) | 16.58 A (0.36) | 0.93 A (0.06) | 0.39 B (0.02) |
|
| 8.3 | 0.34 C (0.01) | 0.61 A (0.20) | 0.40 C (0.04) | 13.58 B (3.15) | 0.18 B (0.01) | 0.23 C (0.02) |
For the same element, different letters indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05.
Nonlinear regression analysis of the relationship between equilibrium P concentration in solution and P adsorbed by the tailings or soil, based on Langmuir and Freundlich equations.
Langmuir—Xm, the P-sorption maximum; b related to bonding energy; Freundlich—k and B are empirical coefficients: k is the sorptivity (mL g-1), an index of sorption capacity and B is related to bonding energy.
| Sample name | Langmuir | Freundlich | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X |
| R2 |
| B | R2 | |
| EHM-TD | 4.02 | 2.28 | 0.94 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.98 |
| MIM-TD5 | 4.16 | 4.12 | 0.93 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.95 |
| MIM-TD7 | 7.72 | 8.45 | 0.99 | 0.73 | 0.32 | 0.94 |
| HS | 3.62 | 2.46 | 0.95 | 0.08 | 0.49 | 0.99 |
Note: EHM = Ernest Henry Mine, TD5 and TD7 = MIM-Tailings Dam 5 and 7; HS = Hillside topsoil; LTD5 = leached TD5 tailings before adsorption test.
Fig 1Phosphate sorption isotherms in the tailings and HS soil, which were fitted with Langmuir equation (see Table 3).
The values were averages of 3 replicates at each P-concentration and the bars indicate corresponding standard deviation.
Langmuir P maximum values and contents of extractable Al and Fe reported in the literature.
| Country/Region | Soil type | Maximum Langmuir P sorbed (mg g-1) | Extractable and total Fe, Al (g kg-1 dry weight) (±SD) | References | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feo | Fed | Fet | Alo | Ald | Alt | ||||
| Alaska, US | Volcanic ash soils | 10.12 | 8.8–10.9 | 9.1–15.3 | ND | 9.2–14.3 | 5.4–10.7 | ND | [ |
| Loess soils | 3.93 | 5.6–8.7 | 8.2–14.6 | ND | 1.4–2.8 | 2.1–11.0 | ND | [ | |
| Indonesia | Andosols (Volcanic ash) | 4.51 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | [ |
| Upland, Thailand | Shale/limestone soils | 0.17–0.83 | 2.3±0.66 | 78±28 | 143±78 | 5.5±3.9 | 5.1±8.0 | 316±97 | [ |
| Basaltic soils | 0.46–1.25 | 14±7.4 | 94±25 | 186±66 | 7.3±4.4 | 20±8.5 | 280±20 | [ | |
| Granitic soils | 0.05–0.40 | 1.3±0.77 | 5.0±7.0 | 11±14 | 0.83±0.62 | 1.8±2.1 | 60±70 | [ | |
| Old alluvium & sediments | 0.05–0.50 | 1.1±0.65 | 6.3±6.2 | 12±12 | 2.5±1.5 | 3.1±1.9 | 39±51 | [ | |
| South western Australia | Soils with Hematite | 0.62 | 1.038 | 21.71 | ND | 2.18 | 3.94 | ND | [ |
| Soils without Hematite | 0.07 | 0.425 | 2.01 | ND | 0.643 | 0.883 | ND | [ | |
| Soils with Goethite | 0.27 | 0.724 | 10.01 | ND | 0.724 | 2.742 | ND | [ | |
| Soils without Goethite | 0.14 | 0.290 | 0.855 | ND | 0.290 | 0.461 | ND | [ | |
Notes: Feo or Alo are Fe and Al extracted by acid oxalate; Fed or Ald are Fe and Al extracted by dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate solution; Fet or Alt are total Fe and Al. SD = Standard devidation; ND = not determined.
Fig 2The particle size distribution of the tailings samples and HS soil sample.
The presence of major primary and secondary minerals identified in the tailings and soil samples by XRD-analysis.
| Mineral | Dominant Composition | EHM-TD | MIM-TD5 | MIM-TD7 | HS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz | SiO2 | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| Calcite | Ca(CO3)2 | √ | √ | ||
| Dolomite | CaMg(CO3)2 | √ | √ | ||
| Gypsum | CaSO4(H2O)2 | √ | √ | ||
| Ankerite | Ca(Fe2+,Mg,Mn2+)(CO3)2 | √ | |||
| Pyrite | FeS2 | √ | √ | √ | |
| Siderite | Fe2+CO3 | √ | √ | ||
| Sphalerite | (Zn,Fe)S | √ | |||
| Goethite | α–Fe3+O(OH) | √ | |||
| Hematite | α–Fe2O3 | √ | |||
| Magnetite | Fe3O4 | √ | |||
| Linarite | PbCu(SO4)(OH)2 | √ | |||
| Kaolinite | Al2Si2O5(OH)4 | √ | √ | √ | |
| Muscovite | KAl2(Si3Al)O10(OH;F)2 | √ | √ | ||
| Microcline | KAlSi3O8 | √ | |||
| Orthoclase | KAlSi3O8 | √ |
Correlation coefficient (C) values between phosphate sorption capacity and selected physical and chemical properties of the tailings and local soil.
| C | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Clay | 0.83 |
| Ald | 0.10 |
| Cd | 0.97 |
| Fe | 0.41 |
| Fine silt | 0.99 | Fed | 0.84 | Cu | 0.05 | S | 0.93 | ||||
| Medium silt | 0.98 | Mnd | -0.23 | Ni | 0.19 | Al | -0.51 | ||||
| Coarse silt | 0.67 | AlO | 0.66 | Pb | 0.24 | Ca | 0.03 | ||||
| Fine sand | -0.83 | FeO | 0.67 | Zn | 0.99 | K | -0.31 | ||||
| Medium sand | -0.92 | MnO | 0.68 | S | 0.01 | Mg | -0.05 | ||||
| Coarse sand | -0.31 | Na | -0.34 | ||||||||
| P | -0.07 | ||||||||||
| Mn | -0.07 | ||||||||||