Literature DB >> 26295354

Medicare Shared Savings Program: public reporting and shared savings distributions.

John Schulz, Matthew DeCamp, Scott A Berkowitz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACOs) are meeting public reporting requirements related to shared savings plans, to quantitate the composition of shared savings distribution plans, and to investigate whether early ACO success is associated with specific plan or ACO characteristics. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
METHODS: ACO descriptive characteristics and distribution plan details were abstracted from official ACO websites for all 338 active MSSP ACOs launched through January 2014. Publicly available MSSP results from 2012 and 2013 start date ACOs were used to investigate associations with successful shared savings generation.
RESULTS: Of current MSSP ACOs, 313 of 338 (93%) maintain a website, 284 of 338 (84%) provided at least a general statement about shared savings distributions, and 176 of 338 (52%) reported detailed allocation percentages to ACO participants. On average, ACOs reporting detailed allocations planned to give 63% (range = 0%-100%; SD = 26.3) to their primary care providers (PCPs), specialists, and/or hospitals, and 33% (range = 0%-100%; SD = 25.6) to infrastructure. ACOs including a hospital planned to give a larger average percentage to participating entities than those without (69% vs 58%; P = .01). ACOs planning to give > 50% to their PCPs and specialists were more likely to have generated savings (P = .001), as were ACOs composed of > 10 participating entities (P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Just over one-half of MSSP ACOs report detailed shared savings distribution plans online, and these plans vary widely. There appears to be no single shared savings distribution plan determinate of ACO success. Continued investigation of predictors for generating savings is needed to inform future shared savings models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26295354      PMCID: PMC5578417     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  18 in total

1.  Medicare program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-11-02

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Shared savings models for ACOs-incentivizing primary care physicians.

Authors:  Mona Siddiqui; Scott A Berkowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  How the Pioneer ACO Model needs to change: lessons from its best-performing ACO.

Authors:  John Toussaint; Arnold Milstein; Stephen Shortell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A framework for evaluating the formation, implementation, and performance of accountable care organizations.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; Stephen M Shortell; Sara A Kreindler; Aricca D Van Citters; Bridget K Larson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 6.  An academic health center sees both challenges and enabling forces as it creates an accountable care organization.

Authors:  Alfred F Tallia; Jenna Howard
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Accountable care organization readiness and academic medical centers.

Authors:  Scott A Berkowitz; Jennifer J Pahira
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  A taxonomy of accountable care organizations for policy and practice.

Authors:  Stephen M Shortell; Frances M Wu; Valerie A Lewis; Carrie H Colla; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Attention to surgeons and surgical care is largely missing from early medicare accountable care organizations.

Authors:  James M Dupree; Kavita Patel; Sara J Singer; Mallory West; Rui Wang; Michael J Zinner; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Spending differences associated with the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; David E Wennberg; Ellen Meara; Jonathan S Skinner; Daniel Gottlieb; Valerie A Lewis; Christopher M Snyder; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  The importance of health insurance claims data in creating learning health systems: evaluating care for high-need high-cost patients using the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORNet).

Authors:  Maureen A Smith; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Menggang Yu; Xinyi Wang; Peter A Nordby; Christine Vogeli; Jonathan Jaffery; Joshua P Metlay
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Out-Of-Network Primary Care Is Associated With Higher Per Beneficiary Spending In Medicare ACOs.

Authors:  Sunny C Lin; Phyllis L Yan; Nicholas M Moloci; Emily J Lawton; Andrew M Ryan; Julia Adler-Milstein; John M Hollingsworth
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Risk from delayed or missed care and non-COVID-19 outcomes for older patients with chronic conditions during the pandemic.

Authors:  Maureen Smith; Mary Vaughan Sarrazin; Xinyi Wang; Peter Nordby; Menggang Yu; Allie J DeLonay; Jonathan Jaffery
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 7.538

4.  Impactability Modeling for Reducing Medicare Accountable Care Organization Payments and Hospital Events in High-Need High-Cost Patients: Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maureen A Smith; Menggang Yu; Jared D Huling; Xinyi Wang; Allie DeLonay; Jonathan Jaffery
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 7.076

5.  Regional cost and experience, not size or hospital inclusion, helps predict ACO success.

Authors:  John Schulz; Matthew DeCamp; Scott A Berkowitz
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.