| Literature DB >> 26295048 |
Po-Yao Chuang1, Tien-Yu Yang1, Shih-Hsun Shen1, Yao-Hung Tsai2, Kuo-Chin Huang2.
Abstract
A number of studies have demonstrated that dorsal cortical comminution (DCC) can predict redisplacement after nonoperative treatment of Colles' fractures; however, the effects of a DCC defect on radiographic outcomes following percutaneous pinning for dorsally displaced extraarticular Colles' fractures are unclear. We, therefore, performed a retrospective study on 85 patients who sustained such fractures treated with percutaneous pinning within 2006-2009. The main outcome measures included four radiographic parameters, including radial height, radial inclination, radial tilt, and ulnar variance. The radiological results showed that all fractures after percutaneous pinning followed the same time series changes and patterns of fracture collapse regardless of the presence of a DCC defect. The use of the pinning construct is to provide support for static loading but not for dynamic loading. Although the final radiographic outcomes were classified as acceptable in fractures with and without DCC, we recommend that a different approach in the management of displaced Colles' fractures might be necessary in consideration of increasing patient expectations of health care.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26295048 PMCID: PMC4532818 DOI: 10.1155/2015/714351
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Group comparisons of patient characteristics.
| Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean years (range) | 58.6 (20, 73) | 58.2 (23, 80) | 0.889 |
| Gender | 0.975‡ | ||
| Male | 7 (23.3) | 13 (23.6) | |
| Female | 23 (76.7) | 42 (76.4) | |
| Side | 0.021‡, | ||
| Dominant | 7 (23.3) | 27 (49.1) | |
| Nondominant | 23 (76.7) | 28 (50.9) | |
| Technique | 0.160‡ | ||
| Willenegger | 24 (80.0) | 36 (65.5) | |
| Kapandji | 6 (20.0) | 19 (34.5) |
†Wilcoxon rank sum test, unless otherwise stated.
‡Fisher's exact or chi-squared tests as applicable.
The difference is significant (P < 0.05).
Group comparison of radiographic parameters before/after fracture reduction.
| Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-op (mean, SD) | |||
| RHa (mm) | 9.22 (2.19) | 8.90 (2.66) | 0.551 |
| RIb (degree) | 19.08 (4.31) | 19.01 (4.99) | 0.947 |
| RTc (degree) | −14.67 (7.46) | −20.76 (11.64) | 0.004 |
| UVd (mm) | 2.83 (2.38) | 3.95 (2.49) | 0.045 |
| Post-op (mean, SD) | |||
| RH (mm) | 11.79 (1.94) | 12.18 (1.97) | 0.388 |
| RI (degree) | 24.06 (3.07) | 24.20 (3.12) | 0.847 |
| RT (degree) | 3.57 (4.43) | 3.12 (5.09) | 0.674 |
| UV (mm) | 1.13 (1.60) | 1.50 (2.19) | 0.377 |
| Δe Post−Pre-op (mean, SD) | |||
| RH (mm) | 2.57 (1.70) | 3.28 (2.05) | 0.093 |
| RI (degree) | 4.98 (3.26) | 5.19 (3.87) | 0.796 |
| RT (degree) | 18.23 (9.19) | 23.88 (11.07) | 0.014 |
| UV (mm) | −1.70 (1.77) | −2.46 (2.08) | 0.083 |
†Wilcoxon rank sum test, unless otherwise stated.
The difference is significant (P < 0.05).
aRH: radial height; bRI: radial inclination; cRT: radial tilt; dUV: ulnar variance; eΔ Y 2 − Y 1: change of Y.
Figure 1Group comparison of radiographic measurements before and after fracture fixation. Pre-op: preoperatively; post-op: postoperatively; Mx: x months after the index surgery; ††/¶¶: P < 0.001 for A2.2 and A3, respectively; †/¶: P < 0.05 for A2.2 and A3, respectively; NS: not significant.
Group comparison of radiographic parameters after fracture fixation.
| Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RHa (mm) (mean, SD) | |||
| Post-op | 11.79 (1.94) | 12.18 (1.97) | 0.388 |
| M1§ | 11.08 (2.25) | 11.04 (2.32) | 0.937 |
| M2 | 10.87 (2.16) | 10.74 (2.51) | 0.813 |
| M3 | 10.82 (2.29) | 10.67 (2.45) | 0.778 |
| RIb (degree) (mean, SD) | |||
| Post-op | 24.06 (3.07) | 24.20 (3.12) | 0.847 |
| M1 | 23.00 (3.55) | 22.59 (4.37) | 0.640 |
| M2 | 22.72 (3.37) | 22.40 (4.52) | 0.708 |
| M3 | 22.83 (3.37) | 22.28 (4.60) | 0.531 |
| VTc (degree) (mean, SD) | |||
| Post-op | 3.57 (4.43) | 3.12 (5.09) | 0.674 |
| M1 | −0.87 (7.40) | −2.87 (8.93) | 0.275 |
| M2 | −2.44 (8.47) | −4.20 (9.70) | 0.387 |
| M3 | −2.65 (8.57) | −4.36 (9.32) | 0.397 |
| UVd (mm) (mean, SD) | |||
| Post-op | 1.13 (1.60) | 1.50 (2.19) | 0.377 |
| M1 | 2.36 (1.92) | 2.75 (2.22) | 0.393 |
| M2 | 2.62 (2.08) | 3.24 (2.34) | 0.217 |
| M3 | 2.73 (1.97) | 3.48 (2.43) | 0.127 |
†Wilcoxon rank sum test, unless otherwise stated.
aRH: radial height; bRI: radial inclination; cRT: radial tilt; dUV: ulnar variance.
§Mx, x months after the index surgery.
Group comparison of time-dependent change of radiographic parameters after fracture fixation.
| Variables | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| RHa (mm) (mean, SD) | |||
| Δe Post-op − M1§ | 0.71 (1.28) | 1.14 (1.56) | 0.179 |
| Δ M1 − M2 | 0.22 (0.54) | 0.30 (0.79) | 0.617 |
| Δ M2 − M3 | 0.05 (0.54) | 0.07 (0.45) | 0.810 |
| Δ Post-op − M3 | 0.97 (1.26) | 1.51 (1.71) | 0.104 |
| RIb (degree) (mean, SD) | |||
| Δ Post-op − M1 | 1.06 (2.41) | 1.61 (2.94) | 0.359 |
| Δ M1 − M2 | 0.28 (1.01) | 0.19 (1.20) | 0.728 |
| Δ M2 − M3 | −0.11 (0.88) | 0.13 (0.81) | 0.253 |
| Δ Post-op − M3 | 1.23 (2.50) | 1.92 (3.26) | 0.282 |
| VTc (degree) (mean, SD) | |||
| Δ Post-op − M1 | 4.44 (5.10) | 5.98 (6.88) | 0.285 |
| Δ M1 − M2 | 1.57 (2.26) | 1.34 (2.54) | 0.671 |
| Δ M2 − M3 | 0.21 (1.24) | 0.16 (1.28) | 0.861 |
| Δ Post-op − M3 | 6.21 (6.17) | 7.48 (7.61) | 0.409 |
| UVd (mm) (mean, SD) | |||
| Δ Post-op − M1 | −1.23 (1.27) | −1.26 (1.23) | 0.927 |
| Δ M1 − M2 | −0.27 (0.53) | −0.49 (0.75) | 0.161 |
| Δ M2 − M3 | −0.11 (0.41) | −0.24 (0.65) | 0.239 |
| Δ Post-op − M3 | −1.60 (1.28) | −1.99 (1.60) | 0.236 |
†Wilcoxon rank sum test, unless otherwise stated.
aRH: radial height; bRI: radial inclination; cRT: radial tilt; dUV: ulnar variance; eΔ Y 2 − Y 1: change of Y.
§Mx, x months after the index surgery.
Figure 2Group comparison of the final loss of alignment after fracture fixation. RH: radial height; RI: radial inclination; RT: radial tilt; UV: ulnar variance.