Literature DB >> 26293894

The statistical evaluation and comparison of ADMS-Urban model for the prediction of nitrogen dioxide with air quality monitoring network.

Audrius Dėdelė1, Auksė Miškinytė.   

Abstract

In many countries, road traffic is one of the main sources of air pollution associated with adverse effects on human health and environment. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is considered to be a measure of traffic-related air pollution, with concentrations tending to be higher near highways, along busy roads, and in the city centers, and the exceedances are mainly observed at measurement stations located close to traffic. In order to assess the air quality in the city and the air pollution impact on public health, air quality models are used. However, firstly, before the model can be used for these purposes, it is important to evaluate the accuracy of the dispersion modelling as one of the most widely used method. The monitoring and dispersion modelling are two components of air quality monitoring system (AQMS), in which statistical comparison was made in this research. The evaluation of the Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System (ADMS-Urban) was made by comparing monthly modelled NO2 concentrations with the data of continuous air quality monitoring stations in Kaunas city. The statistical measures of model performance were calculated for annual and monthly concentrations of NO2 for each monitoring station site. The spatial analysis was made using geographic information systems (GIS). The calculation of statistical parameters indicated a good ADMS-Urban model performance for the prediction of NO2. The results of this study showed that the agreement of modelled values and observations was better for traffic monitoring stations compared to the background and residential stations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26293894     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4810-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of spatiotemporal distribution patterns of NO2 between four different types of air quality monitoring stations.

Authors:  Hang Thi Nguyen; Ki-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  Air pollution exposure assessment methods utilized in epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Bin Zou; J Gaines Wilson; F Benjamin Zhan; Yongnian Zeng
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-02-13

3.  STEMS-Air: a simple GIS-based air pollution dispersion model for city-wide exposure assessment.

Authors:  John Gulliver; David Briggs
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  The respiratory health effects of nitrogen dioxide in children with asthma.

Authors:  J Gillespie-Bennett; N Pierse; K Wickens; J Crane; P Howden-Chapman
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 16.671

5.  Spatial variation in nitrogen dioxide in three European areas.

Authors:  Marie Lewné; Josef Cyrys; Kees Meliefste; Gerard Hoek; Michael Brauer; Paul Fischer; Ulrike Gehring; Joachim Heinrich; Bert Brunekreef; Tom Bellander
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Childhood incident asthma and traffic-related air pollution at home and school.

Authors:  Rob McConnell; Talat Islam; Ketan Shankardass; Michael Jerrett; Fred Lurmann; Frank Gilliland; Jim Gauderman; Ed Avol; Nino Künzli; Ling Yao; John Peters; Kiros Berhane
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Prediction and analysis of near-road concentrations using a reduced-form emission/dispersion model.

Authors:  Stuart A Batterman; Kai Zhang; Robert Kononowech
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 8.  Practical advancement of multipollutant scientific and risk assessment approaches for ambient air pollution.

Authors:  Douglas O Johns; Lindsay Wichers Stanek; Katherine Walker; Souad Benromdhane; Bryan Hubbell; Mary Ross; Robert B Devlin; Daniel L Costa; Daniel S Greenbaum
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Air pollution exposure estimation using dispersion modelling and continuous monitoring data in a prospective birth cohort study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Edith H Van den Hooven; Frank H Pierik; Sjoerd W Van Ratingen; Peter Y J Zandveld; Ernst W Meijer; Albert Hofman; Henk M E Miedema; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Yvonne De Kluizenaar
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Childhood cancer and traffic-related air pollution exposure in pregnancy and early life.

Authors:  Julia E Heck; Jun Wu; Christina Lombardi; Jiaheng Qiu; Travis J Meyers; Michelle Wilhelm; Myles Cockburn; Beate Ritz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.