Manish N Shah1, Erin B Wasserman2, Suzanne M Gillespie3, Nancy E Wood4, Hongyue Wang5, Katia Noyes6, Dallas Nelson7, Ann Dozier8, Kenneth M McConnochie9. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: mnshah@medicine.wisc.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. Electronic address: suzanne_gillespie@urmc.rochester.edu. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. 6. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY; Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. 7. Division of Geriatrics and Aging, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. 8. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. 9. Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are common among older adults. The high-intensity telemedicine model of care has been proposed as an innovative approach to expand access to acute illness care, thereby preventing ED visits. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a high-intensity telemedicine program for senior living community (SLC) residents on the rate of ED use for ACSCs. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study at a primary care geriatrics practice that provides care to 22 SLCs. Six SLCs selected as intervention facilities, with the remaining SLCs serving as controls. Consenting practice patients at intervention facilities could have patient-to-provider, real-time, or store-and-forward high-intensity telemedicine services to diagnose and treat illnesses. The primary outcome was the rate of ED visits for which the primary diagnosis was an "ambulatory-care-sensitive" condition by the Institute of Medicine, which we compared between control and intervention participants. RESULTS: During the study period, control participants had 310 ED visits for ACSCs, for a rate of 0.195 visits/person-year. Intervention participants visited the ED for ACSCs 85 times, for a rate of 0.138 visits/person-year [unadjusted rate ratio (RR): 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.94]. Among intervention participants, ED use for ACSCs decreased at an annual rate of 34% (RR: 0.661, 95% CI: 0.444-0.982), whereas, in the control group there was no statistically significant change in ED use over time (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Providing acute illness care by high-intensity telemedicine to older adults residing in SLCs significantly decreases the rate of ED use for ACSCs over 1 year, compared with no change in the rate of ED use for ACSCs among the control group.
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) visits for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are common among older adults. The high-intensity telemedicine model of care has been proposed as an innovative approach to expand access to acute illness care, thereby preventing ED visits. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a high-intensity telemedicine program for senior living community (SLC) residents on the rate of ED use for ACSCs. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study at a primary care geriatrics practice that provides care to 22 SLCs. Six SLCs selected as intervention facilities, with the remaining SLCs serving as controls. Consenting practice patients at intervention facilities could have patient-to-provider, real-time, or store-and-forward high-intensity telemedicine services to diagnose and treat illnesses. The primary outcome was the rate of ED visits for which the primary diagnosis was an "ambulatory-care-sensitive" condition by the Institute of Medicine, which we compared between control and intervention participants. RESULTS: During the study period, control participants had 310 ED visits for ACSCs, for a rate of 0.195 visits/person-year. Intervention participants visited the ED for ACSCs 85 times, for a rate of 0.138 visits/person-year [unadjusted rate ratio (RR): 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.94]. Among intervention participants, ED use for ACSCs decreased at an annual rate of 34% (RR: 0.661, 95% CI: 0.444-0.982), whereas, in the control group there was no statistically significant change in ED use over time (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.90-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Providing acute illness care by high-intensity telemedicine to older adults residing in SLCs significantly decreases the rate of ED use for ACSCs over 1 year, compared with no change in the rate of ED use for ACSCs among the control group.
Authors: Rashid L Bashshur; Joel D Howell; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Kathryn M Harms; Noura Bashshur; Charles R Doarn Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Cassandra L Hua; Wenhan Zhang; Portia Y Cornell; Momotazur Rahman; David M Dosa; Kali S Thomas Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2020-07-06 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Arjun K Venkatesh; Linda S Leo-Summers; Terrence E Murphy; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Ula Hwang; Thomas M Gill Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Brandee A Price; Brian K Bednarski; Y Nancy You; Meryna Manandhar; E Michelle Dean; Zeinab M Alawadi; B Bryce Speer; Vijaya Gottumukkala; Marla Weldon; Robert L Massey; Xuemei Wang; Wei Qiao; George J Chang Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sabine E Lemoyne; Hanne H Herbots; Dennis De Blick; Roy Remmen; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Peter Van Bogaert Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.921