Literature DB >> 26293065

Surgical Management of Large Spontaneous Portosystemic Splenorenal Shunts During Liver Transplantation: Splenectomy or Left Renal Vein Ligation?

N Golse1, K Mohkam2, A Rode3, S Mezoughi2, H Demian2, C Ducerf2, J-Y Mabrut2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Management of splenorenal shunt (SRS) during whole liver transplantation is still controversial. Splenectomy (SP) permits its radical removal, at the price of a specific related morbidity. Left renal vein ligation (LRVL) performs a downstream ligation with potential renal repercussions. This study aimed to compare these techniques regarding portal revascularization and postoperative outcomes.
METHODS: From 1994 to 2012, 22 SPs and 7 LRVLs were performed for large SRS (>1 cm) management.
RESULTS: There was no difference in operating times or transfusion rates. In both groups, efficient portal flow was initially obtained in all cases. After a median follow-up of 79 months, 2 patients in the SP group presented an altered portal flow owing to persistence of a not disconnected mesentericogonadic or splenorenal shunt. Postoperative morbidity, including infection and portal vein thrombosis, was not significantly different (32% vs 14%). SP allowed a faster correction of the thrombocytopenia. The LRVL group had a moderate and temporary impairment of renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: SP and LRVL represent 2 effective procedures to avoid vascular steal in the presence of SRS, but they require a patent portal vein. SP appears to be associated to specific but acceptable intraoperative morbidity, permits treatment of associated splenic artery aneurysm, and enables a faster correction of thrombocytopenia. However, the presence of a remote hilum SRS or another large portosystemic shunt represents a cause of failure of the procedure. LRVL is a safer and less demanding procedure that can suppress portal steal whatever the location of the SRS, but at the price of moderate renal morbidity.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26293065     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  5 in total

1.  Renal Implications of Left Renal Vein Ligation for Portal Flow Augmentation in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Sadhana Shankar; Ashwin Rammohan; Balaji Balasubramanian; Kumar Palaniappan; Rajesh Rajalingam; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Management of spontaneous portosystemic shunts at the time of liver transplantation: treatment or observation? Results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Caterina Cusumano; Stefano Gussago; Martina Guerra; Chloe Paul; François Faitot; Philippe Bachellier; Pietro Addeo
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 9.029

3.  Management of Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunts in 231 Patients Who Underwent Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study from a Single Center in Nagasaki, Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Hamada; Masaaki Hidaka; Akihiko Soyama; Takanobu Hara; Hajime Imamura; Hajime Matsushima; Takayuki Tanaka; Tomohiko Adachi; Kengo Kanetaka; Susumu Eguchi
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 1.479

4.  Liver transplantation in a patient with complete portal vein thrombosis, is there a surgical way out? A case report.

Authors:  Tommaso Maria Manzia; Laura Fazzolari; Matteo Manuelli; Marco Pellicciaro; Leonardo Baiocchi; Giuseppe Tisone
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-19

5.  A Case of Left Renal Vein Ligation in a Patient with Solitary Left Kidney Undergoing Liver Transplantation to Control Splenorenal Shunt and Improve Portal Venous Flow.

Authors:  Rodrigo B Martino; Eserval Rocha Júnior; Valdano Manuel; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Luis Augusto C D'Albuquerque; Wellington Andraus
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.