Literature DB >> 26292553

Electron-Beam-Inactivated Vaccine Against Salmonella Enteritidis Colonization in Molting Hens.

Palmy R Jesudhasan, Jackson L McReynolds, Allen J Byrd, Haiqi He, Kenneth J Genovese, Robert Droleskey, Christina L Swaggerty, Michael H Kogut, Sarah Duke, David J Nisbet, Chandni Praveen, Suresh D Pillai.   

Abstract

Electron-beam (eBeam) irradiation technology has a variety of applications in modern society. The underlying hypothesis was that eBeam-inactivated Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) cells can serve as a vaccine to control SE colonization and shedding in poultry birds. An eBeam dose of 2.5 kGy (kilograys) was used to inactivate a high-titer (10(8) colony-forming units [CFU]) preparation of SE cells. Microscopic studies revealed that the irradiation did not damage the bacterial cell membranes. The vaccine efficacy was evaluated by administering the eBeam-killed SE cells intramuscularly (1 x 10(6) CFU/bird) into 50-wk-old single comb white leghorn hens. On day 14 postvaccination, the hens were challenged orally with live SE cells (1 x 10(9) CFU) and SE colonization of liver, spleen, ceca, and ovaries determined on day 23. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 14, and 23 postvaccination and the sera were analyzed to quantify SE-specific IgG titers. The vaccinated chickens exhibited significantly (P < 0.0001) higher SE-specific IgG antibody responses and reduced SE ceca colonization (1.46 ± 0.39 logi10 CFU/g) compared to nonvaccinated birds (5.32 ± 0.32 log10 CFU/g). They also exhibited significantly lower SE colonization of the ovaries (1/30), spleen (3/30), liver (4/30), and ceca (7/30) compared to nonvaccinated birds. These results provide empirical evidence that eBeam-based SE vaccines are immunogenic and are capable of protecting chickens against SE colonization. The advantages of eBeam-based vaccine technology are that it is nonthermal, avoids the use of formalin, and can be used to generate inactivated vaccines rapidly to address strain-specific infections in farms or flocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26292553     DOI: 10.1637/10917-081014-resnoter

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  9 in total

1.  A critical review of ionizing radiation technologies for the remediation of waters containing Microcystin-LR and M. aeruginosa.

Authors:  Alexandra M Folcik; Suresh D Pillai
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.858

2.  Irradiated Non-replicative Lactic Acid Bacteria Preserve Metabolic Activity While Exhibiting Diverse Immune Modulation.

Authors:  Luca Porfiri; Johanna Burtscher; Richard T Kangethe; Doris Verhovsek; Giovanni Cattoli; Konrad J Domig; Viskam Wijewardana
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Pathogens Inactivated by Low-Energy-Electron Irradiation Maintain Antigenic Properties and Induce Protective Immune Responses.

Authors:  Jasmin Fertey; Lea Bayer; Thomas Grunwald; Alexandra Pohl; Jana Beckmann; Gaby Gotzmann; Javier Portillo Casado; Jessy Schönfelder; Frank-Holm Rögner; Christiane Wetzel; Martin Thoma; Susanne M Bailer; Ekkehard Hiller; Steffen Rupp; Sebastian Ulbert
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Low-Energy Electron Irradiation of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus Provides a Protective Inactivated Vaccine.

Authors:  Julia Finkensieper; Leila Issmail; Jasmin Fertey; Alexandra Rockstroh; Simone Schopf; Bastian Standfest; Martin Thoma; Thomas Grunwald; Sebastian Ulbert
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Electron-Beam Inactivation of Human Rotavirus (HRV) for the Production of Neutralizing Egg Yolk Antibodies.

Authors:  Jill W Skrobarczyk; Cameron L Martin; Sohini S Bhatia; Suresh D Pillai; Luc R Berghman
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Ionizing Radiation Technologies for Vaccine Development - A Mini Review.

Authors:  Sohini S Bhatia; Suresh D Pillai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Response of Microcystis aeruginosa and Microcystin-LR to electron beam irradiation doses.

Authors:  Alexandra M Folcik; Cory Klemashevich; Suresh D Pillai
Journal:  Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.858

8.  Escherichia coli Cells Exposed to Lethal Doses of Electron Beam Irradiation Retain Their Ability to Propagate Bacteriophages and Are Metabolically Active.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Charlotte Hieke; Suresh D Pillai
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Controlling the Colonization of Clostridium perfringens in Broiler Chickens by an Electron-Beam-Killed Vaccine.

Authors:  Palmy R Jesudhasan; Sohini S Bhatia; Kirthiram K Sivakumar; Chandni Praveen; Kenneth J Genovese; Haiqi L He; Robert Droleskey; Jack L McReynolds; James A Byrd; Christina L Swaggerty; Michael H Kogut; David J Nisbet; Suresh D Pillai
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.