Literature DB >> 26291173

Filovirus RNA in Fruit Bats, China.

Biao He, Yun Feng, Hailin Zhang, Lin Xu, Weihong Yang, Yuzhen Zhang, Xingyu Li, Changchun Tu.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bat; China; Rousettus leschenaultia; filovirus; fruit bats; genetic diversity; viruses; zoonosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26291173      PMCID: PMC4550138          DOI: 10.3201/eid2109.150260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Filovirus-associated diseases, particularly those caused by Ebola and Marburg viruses, represent major threats to human health worldwide because they have extremely high death rates and antiviral therapies or vaccines against them are not available (). Members of the family Filoviridae are classified into 3 genera: Marburgvirus, Ebolavirus, and the recently approved Cuevavirus (,). Marburg virus (MARV) and Ebola virus (EBOV) were initially isolated in Africa, but other filoviruses have been identified on other continents. The initial Cuevavirus, Lloviu virus (LLOV), was identified in Europe (Spain) (), and Ebola-Reston virus has been found in pigs in Asia (the Philippines) (). Bats are natural reservoirs for filoviruses (). Viral isolation and serologic studies indicate that filovirus infections have occurred in various bat species in central Africa countries (), the Philippines (), China (), and Bangladesh (). However, identification of these viruses in bats has been difficult; although isolates of MARV have been obtained () and the genome of LLOV has been fully sequenced (), very short sequences of EBOV have been obtained from bats, and only in Africa (). Reports of molecular detection or isolation of filoviruses in bats in Asia are lacking. We conducted a study to investigate the presence of filoviruses in bats in China. In June 2013, twenty-nine apparently healthy Rousettus leschenaultia fruit bats were captured in Yunnan Province, China. All bats were humanely killed, and their intestines, lungs, livers, and brains were collected and subjected to viral metagenomic analysis by a previously described method (). As a result, we obtained and reassembled de novo 10 million reads into 590,010 contigs. Of these contigs, 3 (129–354 nt) were genetically close to filovirus, corresponding to the nucleoprotein gene of LLOV (74% nt identity), the viral protein 35 gene of Sudan Ebola virus (69% nt identity), and the L gene of Tai Forest Ebola virus (72% nt identity) (Technical Appendix Table 1). For further screening, we used the longest contig as a template for design of specific seminested primers. Nested degenerate primer pairs were also designed and focused on the most conserved region of the L gene of all currently known filoviruses (Technical Appendix Table 2). After screening, 2 reverse transcription PCRs of tissues from 1 bat (Bt-DH04) showed positive amplification in specimens from its lung but not from intestine, liver, or brain tissue. Moreover, 5 blind passages in Vero-E6 cells failed to isolate the virus from the lung homogenate. In an attempt to obtain its genomic sequence, 24 primer pairs covering the full genome were further designed by alignment of these contig sequences with the full genomes of representative filoviruses within the 3 genera. All amplifications used ddH2O as a negative control; positive controls were not available because filoviruses were not available in China. Two fragments of 2,750-nt (F1) and 2,682-nt (F2) were successfully amplified from lung tissue of Bt-DH04; attempts to amplify the remaining regions failed. Alignment with sequences of 26 representative filoviruses of 7 species from 3 genera revealed that F1 covered the 3′ end of the nucleoprotein gene and almost the entire viral protein 35 gene, and that F2 covered the middle region of the L gene, corresponding to nt 1,313–4,085 and nt 12,613–15,302 of the full genome of EBOV (GenBank accession no. HQ613402). The 2 fragment sequences were submitted to Genbank (accession no. KP233864), and the strain has been tentatively named Bt-DH04. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the Bt-DH04 strain is placed, together with LLOV, at basal position and intermediate between EBOV and MARV (Figure). It is divergent from all known filoviruses, with F1 sharing the highest nucleotide identities (46%–49%) to members of the genus Ebolavirus, followed by 44% to LLOV and <40% to MARV (Figure, panel A). The L gene is the most conserved region of filoviruses, and F2 of Bt-DH04 strain shared relatively closer 66%–68% nt identities with members of the genus Ebolavirus, followed by 64% with LLOV and ≈60% with MARV (Figure, panel B). This sequence diversity is likely the main factor for unsuccessful amplification of the full genome of Bt-DH04.
Figure

Phylogenetic analysis of 2 fragments of filovirus Bt-DH04 and other filoviruses. Full genomes of representatives from the family Filoviridae were trimmed and aligned with F1 (partial nucleoprotein/viral protein 35 gene, panel A) and F2 (middle L gene, panel B) of filovirus strain Bt-DH04 by using ClustalW version 2.0 (http://www.clustal.org), then phylogenetically analyzed by using MEGA6 (http://www.megasoftware.net) by the maximum-likelihood method, resulting in a bootstrap testing value of 1,000. Sequences are listed by their GenBank accession numbers, followed by the virus name, host, and collection time. Triangles identify the novel filovirus strain Bt-DH04 (China). Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site.

Phylogenetic analysis of 2 fragments of filovirus Bt-DH04 and other filoviruses. Full genomes of representatives from the family Filoviridae were trimmed and aligned with F1 (partial nucleoprotein/viral protein 35 gene, panel A) and F2 (middle L gene, panel B) of filovirus strain Bt-DH04 by using ClustalW version 2.0 (http://www.clustal.org), then phylogenetically analyzed by using MEGA6 (http://www.megasoftware.net) by the maximum-likelihood method, resulting in a bootstrap testing value of 1,000. Sequences are listed by their GenBank accession numbers, followed by the virus name, host, and collection time. Triangles identify the novel filovirus strain Bt-DH04 (China). Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site. Increasing PCR evidence has identified the existence of filoviruses in bats in Africa and Europe (,); however, although serologic studies have shown that filovirus antibodies are prevalent in bats in a few countries in Asia (e.g., the Philippines, Bangladesh and China [-]), filovirus or filovirus RNA have not been reported in bats in Asia. Our results show that the Bt-DH04 strain is likely a novel bat-borne filovirus in Asia and provide evidence that bats in Asia harbor more divergent filoviruses than previously thought. Fruit bats in the genus Rousettus are widely distributed throughout Southeast Asia, South China, and the entire Indian subcontinent and have had positive serologic results for Ebola viruses in these regions (–), indicating that these bats play a role in the circulation of filoviruses in Asia. The possibility of new emerging filovirus-associated diseases in the continent emphasizes the need for further investigation of these animals.

Technical Appendix

Sample collection, preparation, and outcomes of testing for filoviral RNA in fruit bats, China.
  8 in total

1.  Discovery of swine as a host for the Reston ebolavirus.

Authors:  Roger W Barrette; Samia A Metwally; Jessica M Rowland; Lizhe Xu; Sherif R Zaki; Stuart T Nichol; Pierre E Rollin; Jonathan S Towner; Wun-Ju Shieh; Brigid Batten; Tara K Sealy; Consuelo Carrillo; Karen E Moran; Alexa J Bracht; Gregory A Mayr; Magdalena Sirios-Cruz; Davinio P Catbagan; Elizabeth A Lautner; Thomas G Ksiazek; William R White; Michael T McIntosh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Discovery of an ebolavirus-like filovirus in europe.

Authors:  Ana Negredo; Gustavo Palacios; Sonia Vázquez-Morón; Félix González; Hernán Dopazo; Francisca Molero; Javier Juste; Juan Quetglas; Nazir Savji; Maria de la Cruz Martínez; Jesus Enrique Herrera; Manuel Pizarro; Stephen K Hutchison; Juan E Echevarría; W Ian Lipkin; Antonio Tenorio
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.823

3.  Reston Ebolavirus antibodies in bats, the Philippines.

Authors:  Satoshi Taniguchi; Shumpei Watanabe; Joseph S Masangkay; Tsutomu Omatsu; Tetsuro Ikegami; Phillip Alviola; Naoya Ueda; Koichiro Iha; Hikaru Fujii; Yoshiyuki Ishii; Tetsuya Mizutani; Shuetsu Fukushi; Masayuki Saijo; Ichiro Kurane; Shigeru Kyuwa; Hiroomi Akashi; Yasuhiro Yoshikawa; Shigeru Morikawa
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Isolation of genetically diverse Marburg viruses from Egyptian fruit bats.

Authors:  Jonathan S Towner; Brian R Amman; Tara K Sealy; Serena A Reeder Carroll; James A Comer; Alan Kemp; Robert Swanepoel; Christopher D Paddock; Stephen Balinandi; Marina L Khristova; Pierre B H Formenty; Cesar G Albarino; David M Miller; Zachary D Reed; John T Kayiwa; James N Mills; Deborah L Cannon; Patricia W Greer; Emmanuel Byaruhanga; Eileen C Farnon; Patrick Atimnedi; Samuel Okware; Edward Katongole-Mbidde; Robert Downing; Jordan W Tappero; Sherif R Zaki; Thomas G Ksiazek; Stuart T Nichol; Pierre E Rollin
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Serological evidence of ebolavirus infection in bats, China.

Authors:  Junfa Yuan; Yuji Zhang; Jialu Li; Yunzhi Zhang; Lin-Fa Wang; Zhengli Shi
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.099

6.  Ebola virus antibodies in fruit bats, bangladesh.

Authors:  Kevin J Olival; Ariful Islam; Meng Yu; Simon J Anthony; Jonathan H Epstein; Shahneaz Ali Khan; Salah Uddin Khan; Gary Crameri; Lin-Fa Wang; W Ian Lipkin; Stephen P Luby; Peter Daszak
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Virome profiling of bats from Myanmar by metagenomic analysis of tissue samples reveals more novel Mammalian viruses.

Authors:  Biao He; Zuosheng Li; Fanli Yang; Junfeng Zheng; Ye Feng; Huancheng Guo; Yingying Li; Yiyin Wang; Nan Su; Fuqiang Zhang; Quanshui Fan; Changchun Tu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Filoviruses in bats: current knowledge and future directions.

Authors:  Kevin J Olival; David T S Hayman
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 5.048

  8 in total
  25 in total

1.  Serological Evidence for Henipa-like and Filo-like Viruses in Trinidad Bats.

Authors:  Jonathan E Schulz; Stephanie N Seifert; John T Thompson; Victoria Avanzato; Spencer L Sterling; Lianying Yan; Michael C Letko; M Jeremiah Matson; Robert J Fischer; Alexandre Tremeau-Bravard; Janine F R Seetahal; Vernie Ramkissoon; Jerome Foster; Tracey Goldstein; Simon J Anthony; Jonathan H Epstein; Eric D Laing; Christopher C Broder; Christine V F Carrington; Tony Schountz; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Filoviruses and bats.

Authors:  Amy J Schuh; Brian R Amman; Jonathan S Towner
Journal:  Microbiol Aust       Date:  2017-02-17

Review 3.  Neglected filoviruses.

Authors:  Robin Burk; Laura Bollinger; Joshua C Johnson; Jiro Wada; Sheli R Radoshitzky; Gustavo Palacios; Sina Bavari; Peter B Jahrling; Jens H Kuhn
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 16.408

4.  Filovirus receptor NPC1 contributes to species-specific patterns of ebolavirus susceptibility in bats.

Authors:  Melinda Ng; Esther Ndungo; Maria E Kaczmarek; Andrew S Herbert; Tabea Binger; Ana I Kuehne; Rohit K Jangra; John A Hawkins; Robert J Gifford; Rohan Biswas; Ann Demogines; Rebekah M James; Meng Yu; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Christian Drosten; Lin-Fa Wang; Jens H Kuhn; Marcel A Müller; John M Dye; Sara L Sawyer; Kartik Chandran
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The Glycoproteins of All Filovirus Species Use the Same Host Factors for Entry into Bat and Human Cells but Entry Efficiency Is Species Dependent.

Authors:  Markus Hoffmann; Mariana González Hernández; Elisabeth Berger; Andrea Marzi; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ecological Contexts of Index Cases and Spillover Events of Different Ebolaviruses.

Authors:  Seth D Judson; Robert Fischer; Andrew Judson; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  Undiscovered Bat Hosts of Filoviruses.

Authors:  Barbara A Han; John Paul Schmidt; Laura W Alexander; Sarah E Bowden; David T S Hayman; John M Drake
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-07-14

8.  Serologic Evidence of Fruit Bat Exposure to Filoviruses, Singapore, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Eric D Laing; Ian H Mendenhall; Martin Linster; Dolyce H W Low; Yihui Chen; Lianying Yan; Spencer L Sterling; Sophie Borthwick; Erica Sena Neves; Julia S L Lim; Maggie Skiles; Benjamin P Y-H Lee; Lin-Fa Wang; Christopher C Broder; Gavin J D Smith
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Implementation of Objective PASC-Derived Taxon Demarcation Criteria for Official Classification of Filoviruses.

Authors:  Yīmíng Bào; Gaya K Amarasinghe; Christopher F Basler; Sina Bavari; Alexander Bukreyev; Kartik Chandran; Olga Dolnik; John M Dye; Hideki Ebihara; Pierre Formenty; Roger Hewson; Gary P Kobinger; Eric M Leroy; Elke Mühlberger; Sergey V Netesov; Jean L Patterson; Janusz T Paweska; Sophie J Smither; Ayato Takada; Jonathan S Towner; Viktor E Volchkov; Victoria Wahl-Jensen; Jens H Kuhn
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Surveillance for Ebola Virus in Wildlife, Thailand.

Authors:  Supaporn Wacharapluesadee; Kevin J Olival; Budsabong Kanchanasaka; Prateep Duengkae; Supakarn Kaewchot; Phimchanok Srongmongkol; Gittiyaporn Ieamsaard; Patarapol Maneeorn; Nuntaporn Sittidetboripat; Thongchai Kaewpom; Sininat Petcharat; Sangchai Yingsakmongkon; Pierre E Rollin; Jonathan S Towner; Thiravat Hemachudha
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.