Literature DB >> 26290897

How to Tell the Truth with Statistics: The Case for Accountable Data Analyses in Team-based Science.

Jonathan A L Gelfond1, Craig M Klugman2, Leah J Welty3, Elizabeth Heitman4, Christopher Louden1, Brad H Pollock1.   

Abstract

Data analysis is essential to translational medicine, epidemiology, and the scientific process. Although recent advances in promoting reproducibility and reporting standards have made some improvements, the data analysis process remains insufficiently documented and susceptible to avoidable errors, bias, and even fraud. Comprehensively accounting for the full analytical process requires not only records of the statistical methodology used, but also records of communications among the research team. In this regard, the data analysis process can benefit from the principle of accountability that is inherent in other disciplines such as clinical practice. We propose a novel framework for capturing the analytical narrative called the Accountable Data Analysis Process (ADAP), which allows the entire research team to participate in the analysis in a supervised and transparent way. The framework is analogous to an electronic health record in which the dataset is the "patient" and actions related to the dataset are recorded in a project management system. We discuss the design, advantages, and challenges in implementing this type of system in the context of academic health centers, where team based science increasingly demands accountability.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26290897      PMCID: PMC4539260     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Transl Med Epidemiol        ISSN: 2333-7125


  22 in total

1.  Reproducible research in computational science.

Authors:  Roger D Peng
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Data handling errors spur debate over clinical trial.

Authors:  Stu Hutson
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Expression of concern reaffirmed.

Authors:  Gregory D Curfman; Stephen Morrissey; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Drinking from the fire hose--statistical issues in genomewide association studies.

Authors:  David J Hunter; Peter Kraft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Reproducible research and Biostatistics.

Authors:  Roger D Peng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

7.  The new BMJ policy on sharing data from drug and device trials.

Authors:  Fiona Godlee; Trish Groves
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-20

8.  Error prone.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The New ICMJE Recommendations.

Authors:  Jacob Rosenberg; Howard Bauchner; Joyce Backus; Peter De Leeuw; Jeff Drazen; Frank Frizelle; Fiona Godlee; Charlotte Haug; Astrid James; Christine Laine; Humberto Reyes; Peush Sahni; Getu Zhaori
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.537

Review 10.  Statistical errors in medical research - a review of common pitfalls.

Authors:  Alexander M Strasak; Qamruz Zaman; Karl P Pfeiffer; Georg Göbel; Hanno Ulmer
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 2.193

View more
  1 in total

1.  A System for an Accountable Data Analysis Process in R.

Authors:  Jonathan Gelfond; Martin Goros; Brian Hernandez; Alex Bokov
Journal:  R J       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.