| Literature DB >> 26290707 |
Bolu Steven Abiodun1, Aderibigbe Simeon Adedeji1, Elegbeleye Abiodun1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A six-week study involving two hundred and fifty (250) Harco Black layer birds at point of lay was conducted to investigate the effects of potential natural colorant on performance and Egg quality traits. The birds were assigned to five (5) dietary treatments, each containing supplements either of control, Baobab Leaf (BL), Waterleaf (WL), Red Pepper (RP), Canthaxanthin (CTX) at 40 g/kg feed and 50 mg/kg feed of natural and commercial colorants, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Baobab leaf; Canthaxanthin; Egg yolk colorant; Red pepper; Waterleaf
Year: 2014 PMID: 26290707 PMCID: PMC4540303 DOI: 10.1186/2055-0391-56-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
Composition of experimental diet
| Feed ingredients | Percentage % |
|---|---|
| White maize | 45.0 |
| Corn bran | 10.0 |
| Brewer’s dried grain | 10.0 |
| Wheat offal | 4.50 |
| Fish meal (72%) | 1.44 |
| Soyabean meal | 20.0 |
| Bone meal | 0.26 |
| Oyster shell | 8.00 |
| Vitamin/mineral premix | 0.25 |
| Lysine | 0.10 |
| Methionine | 0.15 |
| Salt | 0.30 |
| Total | 100 |
Nutrient composition according to (8).
The relative effects of the potential natural colorant on Bird’s performance
| Parameter |
|
|
| Canthaxanthin | Control | ±SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWG (g) | 950 ± 0.06ab | 110 ± 0.03b | 470 ± 0.26a | 630 ± 0.15ab | 750 ± 0.45ab | 0.03 |
| AFI (g/bird/d) | 101.33 ± 3.32b | 103.16 ± 3.13b | 94.07 ± 1.37a | 103.56 ± 1.39b | 104.36 ± 2.24b | 0.54 |
| HDP | 52.97 ± 17.99 | 52.97 ± 19.09 | 48.80 ± 16.22 | 58.34 ± 18.91 | 58.60 ± 20.08 | 4.14 |
a, b, ab, Means across same row carrying different superscripts are significant (p < 0.05).
Effects of potential natural colorant on egg external quality traits
| Parameter |
|
|
| Canthaxanthin | Control | ±SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egg weight | 48.27 ± 1.20 | 47.56 ± 6.68 | 46.87 ± 5.20 | 51.79 ± 2.10 | 49.84 ± 2.34 | 0.93 |
| Egg length | 4.35 ± 0.06 | 4.24 ± 0.60 | 4.20 ± 0.46 | 4.55 ± 0.16 | 4.37 ± 0.13 | 0.08 |
| Egg breadth | 3.23 ± 0.09 | 3.08 ± 0.51 | 3.02 ± 0.39 | 3.29 ± 0.06 | 3.16 ± 0.30 | 0.07 |
| Egg index | 1.35 ± 0.48 | 1.38 ± 0.63 | 1.39 ± 0.03 | 1.38 ± 0.06 | 1.38 ± 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Shell thickness | 0.29 ± 0.18 | 0.27 ± 0.18 | 0.27 ± 0.44 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.02 |
Means across same row carrying different superscripts are significant (p < 0.05).
Effects of natural colorant on internal egg quality traits
| Parameter |
|
|
| Canthaxanthin | Control | ±SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yolk height (mm) | 14.83 ± 0.05 | 13.30 ± 2.07 | 13.75 ± 1.58 | 14.53 ± 0.52 | 14.62 ± 0.42 | 0.27 |
| Yolk index | 5.15 ± 0.84 | 4.81 ± 0.76 | 5.19 ± 0.86 | 5.04 ± 0.11 | 5.37 ± 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Yolk width (cm) | 2.89 ± 0.06 | 2.62 ± 0.37 | 2.54 ± 0.25 | 2.89 ± 0.12 | 2.73 ± 0.64 | 0.05 |
| Albumen height (mm) | 5.49 ± 0.21 | 5.06 ± 1.04 | 5.41 ± 1.19 | 5.78 ± 0.43 | 5.54 ± 0.30 | 0.17 |
| Haugh unit | 77.41 ± 1.68 | 76.08 ± 2.22 | 78.21 ± 4.03 | 77.54 ± 2.58 | 76.93 ± 2.25 | 0.60 |
| Yolk color | 7.50 ± 1.47c | 3.31 ± 0.83b | 3.06 ± 0.13b | 2.25 ± 0.20ab | 1.31 ± 0.13a | 0.17 |
a, b, ab, c Means across same row carrying different superscripts are significant (p < 0.05).