Aileen Collier1, Deidre D Morgan2, Kate Swetenham3, Timothy H M To3, David C Currow4, Jennifer J Tieman4. 1. Discipline of Palliative and Supportive Services, School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia aileen.collier@flinders.edu.au. 2. Discipline of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 3. Discipline of Palliative and Supportive Services, School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia Southern Adelaide Palliative Services, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 4. Discipline of Palliative and Supportive Services, School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Telehealth technologies are an emerging resource opening up the possibility of greater support if they have utility for patients, carers and clinicians. They may also help to meet health systems' imperatives for improved service delivery within current budgets. Clinicians' experiences and attitudes play a key role in the implementation of any innovation in service delivery. AIM: To explore clinicians' perspectives on and experiences of the utilisation of a pilot telehealth model and its integration into a specialist community palliative care programme. DESIGN: Focus groups and interviews generated data that were analysed through the lens of a realistic evaluation theoretical framework. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in a metropolitan specialist palliative care service in South Australia. Participants (n = 10) were clinicians involved in the delivery of community specialist palliative care and the piloting of a telehealth programme. RESULTS: Service providers consider telehealth resources as a means to augment current service provision in a complementary way rather than as a replacement for face-to-face assessments. Introducing this technology, however, challenged the team to critically explore aspects of current service provision. The introduction of technologies also has the potential to alter the dynamic of relationships between patients and families and community palliative care clinicians. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a pilot telehealth programme in a specialist palliative community team needs to involve clinical staff in service redesign from the outset. Reliable IT infrastructure and technical support is critical for telehealth models to be effective and will aid uptake.
BACKGROUND: Telehealth technologies are an emerging resource opening up the possibility of greater support if they have utility for patients, carers and clinicians. They may also help to meet health systems' imperatives for improved service delivery within current budgets. Clinicians' experiences and attitudes play a key role in the implementation of any innovation in service delivery. AIM: To explore clinicians' perspectives on and experiences of the utilisation of a pilot telehealth model and its integration into a specialist community palliative care programme. DESIGN: Focus groups and interviews generated data that were analysed through the lens of a realistic evaluation theoretical framework. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in a metropolitan specialist palliative care service in South Australia. Participants (n = 10) were clinicians involved in the delivery of community specialist palliative care and the piloting of a telehealth programme. RESULTS: Service providers consider telehealth resources as a means to augment current service provision in a complementary way rather than as a replacement for face-to-face assessments. Introducing this technology, however, challenged the team to critically explore aspects of current service provision. The introduction of technologies also has the potential to alter the dynamic of relationships between patients and families and community palliative care clinicians. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a pilot telehealth programme in a specialist palliative community team needs to involve clinical staff in service redesign from the outset. Reliable IT infrastructure and technical support is critical for telehealth models to be effective and will aid uptake.
Authors: Anna-Maria Krooupa; Patrick Stone; Stephen McKeever; Kathy Seddon; Sarah Davis; Elizabeth L Sampson; Adrian Tookman; Jonathan Martin; Vinnie Nambisan; Bella Vivat Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.113
Authors: Jennifer J Tieman; Kate Swetenham; Deidre D Morgan; Timothy H To; David C Currow Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Vina N Slev; H Roeline W Pasman; Corien M Eeltink; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Anneke L Francke Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Simen A Steindal; Andréa Aparecida Goncalves Nes; Tove E Godskesen; Alfhild Dihle; Susanne Lind; Anette Winger; Anna Klarare Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Thearis A Osuji; Mayra Macias; Carmit McMullen; Eric Haupt; Brian Mittman; Richard A Mularski; Susan E Wang; Henry Werch; Huong Q Nguyen Journal: Palliat Med Rep Date: 2020-10-06
Authors: M Nguyen; J Fujioka; K Wentlandt; N Onabajo; I Wong; R S Bhatia; O Bhattacharyya; V Stamenova Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Judith Byaruhanga; Christine L Paul; John Wiggers; Emma Byrnes; Aimee Mitchell; Christophe Lecathelinais; Flora Tzelepis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Samuel David Muir; Kathleen de Boer; Neil Thomas; Elizabeth Seabrook; Maja Nedeljkovic; Denny Meyer Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2020-01-21