Literature DB >> 26290380

Comparison of Deconvolution-Based and Absorption Modeling IVIVC for Extended Release Formulations of a BCS III Drug Development Candidate.

Filippos Kesisoglou1, Binfeng Xia2, Nancy G B Agrawal3.   

Abstract

In vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) are predictive mathematical models describing the relationship between dissolution and plasma concentration for a given drug compound. The traditional deconvolution/convolution-based approach is the most common methodology to establish a level A IVIVC that provides point to point relationship between the in vitro dissolution and the in vivo input rate. The increasing application of absorption physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) has provided an alternative IVIVC approach. The current work established and compared two IVIVC models, via the traditional deconvolution/convolution method and via absorption PBPK modeling, for two types of modified release (MR) formulations (matrix and multi-particulate tablets) of MK-0941, a BCS III drug development candidate. Three batches with distinct release rates were studied for each formulation technology. A two-stage linear regression model was used for the deconvolution/convolution approach while optimization of the absorption scaling factors (a model parameter that relates permeability and input rate) in Gastroplus(TM) Advanced Compartmental Absorption and Transit model was used for the absorption PBPK approach. For both types of IVIVC models established, and for either the matrix or the multiparticulate formulations, the average absolute prediction errors for AUC and C max were below 10% and 15%, respectively. Both the traditional deconvolution/convolution-based and the absorption/PBPK-based level A IVIVC model adequately described the compound pharmacokinetics to guide future formulation development. This case study highlights the potential utility of absorption PBPK model to complement the traditional IVIVC approaches for MR products.

Entities:  

Keywords:  absorption modeling; deconvolution; in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC); modified release; physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26290380      PMCID: PMC4627461          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9816-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  14 in total

1.  Evolution of a detailed physiological model to simulate the gastrointestinal transit and absorption process in humans, part II: extension to describe performance of solid dosage forms.

Authors:  Kirstin Thelen; Katrin Coboeken; Stefan Willmann; Jennifer B Dressman; Jörg Lippert
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  In vitro - in vivo correlation: from theory to applications.

Authors:  Jaber Emami
Journal:  J Pharm Pharm Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.327

3.  A comparison of the prediction accuracy of two IVIVC modelling techniques.

Authors:  Clare Gaynor; Adrian Dunne; John Davis
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Prediction of modified release pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics from in vitro, immediate release, and intravenous data.

Authors:  Viera Lukacova; Walter S Woltosz; Michael B Bolger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Suitability of a minipig model in assessing clinical bioperformance of matrix and multiparticulate extended-release formulations for a BCS class III Drug development candidate.

Authors:  Filippos Kesisoglou; Iris Huizhi Xie; Kimberly Manser; Yunhui Wu; Ian Hardy; Shaun Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  PBPK models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms.

Authors:  Edmund S Kostewicz; Leon Aarons; Martin Bergstrand; Michael B Bolger; Aleksandra Galetin; Oliver Hatley; Masoud Jamei; Richard Lloyd; Xavier Pepin; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Erik Sjögren; Christer Tannergren; David B Turner; Christian Wagner; Werner Weitschies; Jennifer Dressman
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Analysis of level A in vitro-in vivo correlations for an extended-release formulation with limited bioavailability.

Authors:  Maziar Kakhi; Patrick Marroum; Jason Chittenden
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 1.627

Review 8.  In vitro/in vivo correlations: scientific implications and standardisation.

Authors:  J M Cardot; E Beyssac
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

9.  Dog colonoscopy model for predicting human colon absorption.

Authors:  Steven C Sutton; Loreen A Evans; Jay H Fortner; Jennifer M McCarthy; Kathy Sweeney
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Population-based mechanistic prediction of oral drug absorption.

Authors:  Masoud Jamei; David Turner; Jiansong Yang; Sibylle Neuhoff; Sebastian Polak; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Geoffrey Tucker
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.009

View more
  12 in total

1.  Characterising Drug Release from Immediate-Release Formulations of a Poorly Soluble Compound, Basmisanil, Through Absorption Modelling and Dissolution Testing.

Authors:  Cordula Stillhart; Neil J Parrott; Marc Lindenberg; Pascal Chalus; Darren Bentley; Anikó Szepes
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Absorption Modeling for Osmotic Pump Products.

Authors:  Zhanglin Ni; Arjang Talattof; Jianghong Fan; Eleftheria Tsakalozou; Satish Sharan; Dajun Sun; Hong Wen; Liang Zhao; Xinyuan Zhang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models: approaches for enabling personalized medicine.

Authors:  Clara Hartmanshenn; Megerle Scherholz; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 2.745

4.  A framework for 2-stage global sensitivity analysis of GastroPlus™ compartmental models.

Authors:  Megerle L Scherholz; James Forder; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 5.  Current State and Challenges of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Oral Drug Product Development.

Authors:  Di Wu; Min Li
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 6.  The Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Analyses-in Biopharmaceutics Applications -Regulatory and Industry Perspectives.

Authors:  Om Anand; Xavier J H Pepin; Vidula Kolhatkar; Paul Seo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.580

Review 7.  Scientific and Regulatory Considerations in Solid Oral Modified Release Drug Product Development.

Authors:  Min Li; Sanna Sander; John Duan; Susan Rosencrance; Sarah Pope Miksinski; Lawrence Yu; Paul Seo; Bhagwant Rege
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Mechanistic Deconvolution of Oral Absorption Model with Dynamic Gastrointestinal Fluid to Predict Regional Rate and Extent of GI Drug Dissolution.

Authors:  Alex Yu; Mark J Koenigsknecht; Bart Hens; Jason R Baker; Bo Wen; Trachette L Jackson; Manjunath P Pai; William Hasler; Gordon L Amidon; Duxin Sun
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  A Three-Pulse Release Tablet for Amoxicillin: Preparation, Pharmacokinetic Study and Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Authors:  Jin Li; Hongyu Chai; Yang Li; Xuyu Chai; Yan Zhao; Yunfan Zhao; Tao Tao; Xiaoqiang Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing.

Authors:  Moawia M Al-Tabakha; Muaed J Alomar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.