Literature DB >> 26290275

Atenolol vs enalapril in young hypertensive patients after successful repair of aortic coarctation.

G Di Salvo1, B Castaldi1, S Gala1, L Baldini1, F Del Gaizo1, F A D'Aiello1, A Mormile1, A Rea1, G Scognamiglio1, G Pacileo1, S Keating2, B M Fadel2, L Berrino3, A Perna4, M G Russo1, R Calabrò1.   

Abstract

Late arterial hypertension has been identified as a major predictor for morbidity and mortality in aortic coarctation (AoC) patients. Few data are available about efficacy and tolerability of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors vs beta-blockers in young AoC patients. This study aimed to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy on 24-h blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular mass/height(2.7) (LVMI), of atenolol vs enalapril. We enrolled consecutive AoC hypertensive patients with (a) no history of BP treatment or after >48 h of withdrawn, (b) aged 6-20 years, (c) body mass index (BMI) <90th percentile for age and sex, (d) >12 months from a successful AoC repair and (e) no major associated cardiovascular abnormalities. All patient were evaluated with 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, standard echocardiography, strain-strain rate imaging, at enrolment, 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment. We studied 51 AoC patients (13±3.9 years, BMI: 21.4±4.3 kg m(-2)). Patients were randomly assigned at atenolol treatment (n=26), or enalapril treatment (n=25). The mean follow-up duration was 11±2 months. Both drugs were able to significantly reduce 24-systolic BP (SBP; atenolol: 133±11 mm Hg vs 124±16 mm Hg, P=0.016; enalapril: 135±6 mm Hg vs 127±7 mm Hg, P=0.001). Only enalapril was able to significantly reduce LVMI (47±12  vs 39.6±10 g m(-)(2.7), P=0.016). Only in atenolol group in two cases (7.7%) drug withdrawal was needed because of adverse events. Enalapril and atenolol are similarly effective in reducing SBP. However, only enalapril demonstrated a significant reduction of LVMI. In no case, enalapril was stopped because of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26290275     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2015.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  31 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  P Verdecchia
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Strain and strain rate imaging: a new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function.

Authors:  George R Sutherland; Giovanni Di Salvo; Piet Claus; Jan D'hooge; Bart Bijnens
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Systolic hypertension during submaximal exercise after correction of coarctation of aorta.

Authors:  F W James; S Kaplan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Abnormal myocardial deformation properties in obese, non-hypertensive children: an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, standard echocardiographic, and strain rate imaging study.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Salvo; Giuseppe Pacileo; Emanuele Miraglia Del Giudice; Francesco Natale; Giuseppe Limongelli; Marina Verrengia; Alessandra Rea; Fiorella Fratta; Biagio Castaldi; Antonello D'Andrea; Paolo Calabrò; Tiziana Miele; Filomena Coppola; Maria Giovanna Russo; Pio Caso; Laura Perrone; Raffaele Calabrò
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure.

Authors:  J E Liu; M J Roman; R Pini; J E Schwartz; T G Pickering; R B Devereux
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation.

Authors:  G Mancia; A Zanchetti; E Agabiti-Rosei; G Benemio; R De Cesaris; R Fogari; A Pessina; C Porcellati; A Rappelli; A Salvetti; B Trimarco; E Agebiti-Rosei; A Pessino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Left ventricular long axis dysfunction in adults with "corrected" aortic coarctation is related to an older age at intervention and increased aortic stiffness.

Authors:  Y-Y Lam; M J Mullen; M G Kaya; M A Gatzoulis; W Li; M Y Henein
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.

Authors:  G de Simone; S R Daniels; R B Devereux; R A Meyer; M J Roman; O de Divitiis; M H Alderman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Effects of losartan on hypertension and left ventricular mass: a long-term study.

Authors:  M A Tedesco; G Ratti; D Aquino; G Limongelli; G di Salvo; S Mennella; D Galzerano; D Iarussi; A Iacono
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.012

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Hypertension in Coarctation of the Aorta: Challenges in Diagnosis in Children.

Authors:  Trisha V Vigneswaran; Manish D Sinha; Israel Valverde; John M Simpson; Marietta Charakida
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 1.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.