Literature DB >> 26290189

Lack of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations in triple-negative breast cancer in China.

Wen-Ming Cao1,2, Yun Gao2,3, Xiao-Jia Wang4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26290189      PMCID: PMC4545880          DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0628-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res        ISSN: 1465-5411            Impact factor:   6.466


× No keyword cloud information.
We read with interest the study by Teng and colleagues reporting a high frequency (11.4 %) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a Singapore cohort [1]. In a separate study, EGFR-activating mutations were detected in 7.7 % (1 out of 13) of Chinese basal-like breast cancers [2]. Interestingly, this frequency ranged from 0 to 3 % of other Asian and Caucasian patients [3, 4]. These results indicate that the frequency of these mutations may vary according to geographic and ethnic differences, as reported in non-small cell lung cancer, and these mutations appear to be limited mostly to Chinese patients with TNBC. In this study, in-depth characterization of these mutations in Chinese TNBC was attempted on retrospective archival tissues. Fifty freshly frozen specimens of TNBC from patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomly selected from Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, China, from 2010 to 2011. The specimens were confirmed to be estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative, and less than 1 % of tumor cells showed positive nuclear staining by an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay. HER-2 negativity was defined as a score of 0 or 1+ by IHC assay or a HER-2/chromosome 17 ratio of less than 2 and fewer than 4 HER-2 copies per nucleus by a fluorescence in situ hybridization assay. Written consent was obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of Zhejiang Cancer Hospital. Twenty-five EGFR-activating mutations (G719S, G719A, G719C, S768I, L858R, and L861Q and 19 mutations of exon 19-Del) were analyzed by an Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS) assay by using an ADx EGFR29 Mutation Kit (Amoy Diagnostics, Xiamen, China). The ARMS assay is able to detect mutations with allele frequencies as low as 1 % [5]. Exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction assay, and all fragments were bidirectionally sequenced to screen for other mutations. None of the EGFR-activating mutations was found by these two assays, but four single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified by the sequencing assay (Table 1).
Table 1

Polymorphisms in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of EGFR in 50 triple-negative breast cancers

ExonPositionAmino acid changeMinor allele frequency (number)dbSNPNNSpliceHuman Splicing Finder
Score ratio of donor site (SNP versus normal)Score ratio of acceptor site (SNP versus normal)
Intron 19c.2283 + 103C > T-0.1 (10)rs172903710.48:0.53-Creation of an intronic ESE site
20c.2361G > AQ787Q0.18 (9)rs10501710:0.43-Probably no impact on splicing
20c.2457G > AV819V0.04 (1)rs561837130.53:00.89:0.651. Creation of an exonic ESS site
2. Alteration of an exonic ESE site
Intron 20c.2470-68C > A-0.02 (1)rs530416576--Creation of an intronic ESE site

EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, ESE exonic splicing enhancer, ESS exonic splicing silencer

Polymorphisms in exons 18, 19, 20, and 21 of EGFR in 50 triple-negative breast cancers EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, ESE exonic splicing enhancer, ESS exonic splicing silencer In silico prediction was performed to investigate the effect of the SNPs on gene splicing by using two programs: NNSplice 0.9 version (http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html) and Human Splicing Finder (http://www.umd.be/HSF3/). All four SNPs, particularly the c.2457G > A SNP, were predicted to alter splicing by one or both programs. In summary, none of the well-known EGFR-activating mutations was identified in our cohort. This suggests that TNBCs form a group of cancers with marked heterogeneity. Targetable mutations may be present and clinically helpful in only a limited number of Chinese patients with TNBC.
  5 in total

1.  High EGFR gene copy number predicts poor outcome in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Heae Surng Park; Min Hye Jang; Eun Joo Kim; Hyun Jeong Kim; Hee Jin Lee; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Eunyoung Kang; Sung-Won Kim; In Ah Kim; So Yeon Park
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Absence of evidence for epidermal growth factor receptor and human homolog of the Kirsten rat sarcoma-2 virus oncogene mutations in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ning Lv; Suxia Lin; Zeming Xie; Jun Tang; Qidong Ge; Minqing Wu; Xinhua Xie; Xiaoming Xie; Weidong Wei
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Influence of chemotherapy on EGFR mutation status among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hua Bai; Zhijie Wang; Keneng Chen; Jun Zhao; J Jack Lee; Shuhang Wang; Qinghua Zhou; Minglei Zhuo; Li Mao; Tongtong An; Jianchun Duan; Lu Yang; Meina Wu; Zhen Liang; Yuyan Wang; Xiaozheng Kang; Jie Wang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in triple negative breast cancer: possible implications for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Yvonne Hui-Fang Teng; Wai-Jin Tan; Aye-Aye Thike; Poh-Yian Cheok; Gary Man-Kit Tse; Nan-Soon Wong; George Wai-Cheong Yip; Boon-Huat Bay; Puay-Hoon Tan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Lack of EGFR-activating mutations in European patients with triple-negative breast cancer could emphasise geographic and ethnic variations in breast cancer mutation profiles.

Authors:  William Jacot; Evelyne Lopez-Crapez; Simon Thezenas; Romain Senal; Frédéric Fina; Frédéric Bibeau; Gilles Romieu; Pierre-Jean Lamy
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.466

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Prognostic Evaluation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Genotype and Phenotype Parameters in Triple-negative Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Sofia Levva; Vassiliki Kotoula; Ioannis Kostopoulos; Kyriaki Manousou; Christos Papadimitriou; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Sotiris Lakis; Kyriakos Koukoulias; Vasilios Karavasilis; George Pentheroudakis; Eufemia Balassi; Flora Zagouri; Ioannis G Kaklamanos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Evangelia Razis; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Pavlos Papakostas; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Grigorios Rallis; Helen Gogas; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Phase 1 Study of Erlotinib and Metformin in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Fenn; Matthew Maurer; Shing M Lee; Katherine D Crew; Meghna S Trivedi; Melissa K Accordino; Dawn L Hershman; Kevin Kalinsky
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  A perspective on anti-EGFR therapies targeting triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Katsuya Nakai; Mien-Chie Hung; Hirohito Yamaguchi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Eps15 homology domain 1 promotes the evolution of papillary thyroid cancer by regulating endocytotic recycling of epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Yanan Liang; Ming Li; Duanyang Liu; Jing Tang; Weiwei Yang; Dandan Tong; Xiaoming Jin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Therapeutic landscape in mutational triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yaqin Shi; Juan Jin; Wenfei Ji; Xiaoxiang Guan
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 27.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.