Literature DB >> 2629018

Estimation of trial-to-trial variation in evoked potential signals by smoothing across trials.

B I Turetsky, J Raz, G Fein.   

Abstract

Averaging single trial evoked potential data to produce an estimate of the underlying signal obscures trial-to-trial variation in the response. We describe a method for estimating slow changes in the evoked potential signal by smoothing the data over trials. We discuss the crucial issue of deciding how much to smooth and suggest that an appropriate smoothing parameter is one that minimizes the estimated mean average square error of the smoothed data. Equations to estimate the mean average square error for a one-dimensional local linear regression smoother are presented. Performance of the method is assessed using simulated evoked potential data with several different models of a changing signal and different values of the signal-to-noise ratio. We find that the method rarely imputes trial-to-trial variation to data sets that have an unchanging signal, while it almost always produces less error than averaging when estimating a varying signal. The ability of the method to reveal signal heterogeneity is hampered by very low signal-to-noise ratios. When applied to real auditory evoked potential data from a sample of elderly subjects, the method indicated a changing signal in 35% of all subjects and in 56% of subjects with signal-to-noise ratios above 0.6. Consistent patterns of variation in the auditory evoked potential were present in this sample.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2629018     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1989.tb03176.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

1.  Performances of surface Laplacian estimators: a study of simulated and real scalp potential distributions.

Authors:  F Babiloni; C Babiloni; L Fattorini; F Carducci; P Onorati; A Urbano
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  A multi-dimensional functional principal components analysis of EEG data.

Authors:  Kyle Hasenstab; Aaron Scheffler; Donatello Telesca; Catherine A Sugar; Shafali Jeste; Charlotte DiStefano; Damla Şentürk
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Mind the Noise When Identifying Computational Models of Cognition from Brain Activity.

Authors:  Antonio Kolossa; Bruno Kopp
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  An EEG Classification-Based Method for Single-Trial N170 Latency Detection and Estimation.

Authors:  Siyuan Zang; Xiaojun Ding; Meihong Wu; Changle Zhou
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  A subspace method for dynamical estimation of evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefanos D Georgiadis; Perttu O Ranta-aho; Mika P Tarvainen; Pasi A Karjalainen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2007
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.