Literature DB >> 26289733

Personalized medicine and economic evaluation in oncology: all theory and no practice?

Livio Garattini1, Alessandro Curto1, Nick Freemantle2.   

Abstract

The clinical definition of personalized medicine (PM) is closely related to that of pharmacogenomics. Ideally, PM could lead the pharmaceutical industry to differentiate products by subgroups of patients with the same pathology and find new gene targets for drug discovery. Here, we focus on the potential impact of PM on the design of clinical trials and economic evaluations limited to oncology (its first and main field of application). Then, we assess the European economic evaluations focused on trastuzumab and cetuximab, the two drugs usually mentioned as emblematic examples of targeted therapies. Clinical results of PM in oncology have not been as encouraging as hoped so far. Of course, economic evaluations on targeted therapies cannot help overcome the lack of clinical evidence for most of them. The two paradigmatic examples of cetuximab and trastuzumab indicate that the methodological implications on economic evaluations debated in the literature are more theoretical than practical.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cetuximab; economic evaluation; oncology; personalized medicine; targeted therapy; trastuzumab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26289733     DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2015.1078239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  7 in total

Review 1.  A multidimensional sight on cardiac failure: uncovered from structural to molecular level.

Authors:  Vijay Urmaliya; Gustavo Franchelli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Dutch guidelines for economic evaluation: 'from good to better' in theory but further away from pharmaceuticals in practice?

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Toward precision medicine of breast cancer.

Authors:  Nicolas Carels; Lizânia Borges Spinassé; Tatiana Martins Tilli; Jack Adam Tuszynski
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.432

4.  Precision medicine and monoclonal antibodies: breach of promise?

Authors:  Livio Garattini; Anna Padula
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 5.  A Review of the Challenges of Using Biomedical Big Data for Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Patrick Fahr; James Buchanan; Sarah Wordsworth
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 6.  Liquid dynamic medicine and N-of-1 clinical trials: a change of perspective in oncology research.

Authors:  Nicola Silvestris; Gennaro Ciliberto; Paolo De Paoli; Giovanni Apolone; Maria Luisa Lavitrano; Marco A Pierotti; Giorgio Stanta
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-13

7.  The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  James Love-Koh; Alison Peel; Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla; Kate Ennis; Rosemary Lovett; Andrea Manca; Anastasia Chalkidou; Hannah Wood; Matthew Taylor
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.