| Literature DB >> 26288726 |
Zainab Moslehi1, Amir Daraei Garmakhany2, Maryam Araghi1, Marzie Moslehi3.
Abstract
Pistachio is a nut with high consumption that can be affected by aflatoxin contamination. Regarding influence of this fungus on global trade, broad studies in this area seem to be necessary. In this research, pistachio nuts were coated with methyl cellulose at different concentrations of 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% by immersion method. Samples were stored in an incubator (25°C) for 4 months. Imaging was performed by electron microscope using SEM method and chemical changes (moisture, iodine, peroxide, and acidic value) were investigated during storage periods. Results showed that variations in storage time and methyl cellulose concentration had significant effect on moisture content and peroxide value (P < 0.05). Also, in case of acidic value, a significant difference was observed between treatments so that pistachio at concentration of 2% showed the highest acidic value. The highest iodine value loss was related to a concentration of 0.1% and the lowest value was observed in the control sample.Entities:
Keywords: Methyl cellulose coating; peroxide value; pistachio nuts; scanning electron microscopescanning electron microscope
Year: 2015 PMID: 26288726 PMCID: PMC4534163 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.227
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Moisture content of different pistachio-coated samples during storage period.
Figure 2Peroxide value of different pistachio-coated samples during storage period.
Figure 3Acidic value for different pistachio-coated samples during storage period.
Figure 4Results of iodine value test for different pistachio-coated samples during storage period.
Figure 5Diameter of pistachio nut samples: (A) control; (B) coated with 0.1% of methyl cellulose; (C) coated with 0.5% of methyl cellulose; (D) coated with 1% of methyl cellulose; (E) coated with 2% of methyl cellulose.
Figure 6Coating uniformity: (A) control sample; (B) 0.1% sample; (C) 0.5% sample; (D) 1% sample; and (E) 2% sample.
Figure 7Coating porosity: (A) control sample; (B) 0.1% sample; (C) 0.5% sample; (D) 1% sample; (E) 2% sample.
Size of coating porosity
| Sample code | Porosity percent |
|---|---|
| Control sample | 4.3 |
| 0.1% coated sample | 0.6 |
| 0.5% coated sample | 1.9 |
| 1% coated sample | 1 |
| 2% coated sample | 0.6 |