Literature DB >> 26287880

Transepithelial versus epithelium-off crosslinking in adults with progressive keratoconus.

Eren Çerman1, Ebru Toker2, Deniz Ozarslan Ozcan2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of epithelium-off corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) with transepithelial CXL in patients with progressive keratoconus.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: Eyes that had transepithelial CXL were compared with eyes treated with epithelium-off CXL. All patients with a follow-up of 18 months were evaluated for uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, corneal topography, aberrometry, and pachymetry (Pentacam).
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 22.8 years ± 4.7 (SD) (range 18 to 31 years) in the transepithelial group (30 eyes) and 23.7 ± 3.9 years (range 18 to 30 years) in the epithelium-off group (30 eyes). The mean UDVA and CDVA significantly improved in both groups (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the CDVA gain between the 2 groups. In the epithelium-off group, significant improvements occurred in spherical error (P = .002), spherical equivalent (P = .004), maximum keratometry (K), flat K (P = .036), and steep K (P < .001). The reductions in flat K, steep K, and maximum K were greater in the epithelium-off group (P = .004 for flat K; P < .001 for steep K and maximum K). In the transepithelial group, significant improvements occurred in the cylindrical error (P = .009) and in the index of surface variance and index of surface asymmetry (both P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Although transepithelial CXL seemed to have reduced effectiveness in inducing improvement in topographic indices, its effect on visual acuity is likely to be similar to that of epithelium-off CXL. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26287880     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus.

Authors:  Bo-Wen Ouyang; Hui Ding; Han Wang; Zhen-Duo Yang; Tan Zhong; Hong-Ming Fan; Xing-Wu Zhong
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Systematic review and Meta-analysis comparing modified cross-linking and standard cross-linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Yi Liu; Ying-Nan Zhang; Ai-Peng Li; Jing Zhang; Qing-Feng Liang; Ying Jie; Zhi-Qiang Pan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Prospective 2-year study of accelerated pulsed transepithelial corneal crosslinking outcomes for Keratoconus.

Authors:  Mohammed Ziaei; Hans Vellara; Akilesh Gokul; Dipika Patel; Charles N J McGhee
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Excimer laser-assisted corneal epithelial pattern ablation for corneal cross-linking.

Authors:  Jurriaan Brekelmans; Mor M Dickman; Shwetabh Verma; Samuel Arba-Mosquera; Ruth Goldschmidt; Alexandra Goz; Alexander Brandis; Tos T J M Berendschot; Isabelle E Y Saelens; Arie L Marcovich; Avigdor Scherz; Rudy M M A Nuijts
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sueko M Ng; Mark Ren; Kristina B Lindsley; Barbara S Hawkins; Irene C Kuo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-23

6.  Novel Technique of Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking Using Iontophoresis in Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Paolo Raffa; Marianna Rosati; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 1.909

7.  Comparison of transepithelial corneal crosslinking with epithelium-off crosslinking (epithelium-off CXL) in adult Pakistani population with progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Bushra Akbar; Rana Intisar-Ul-Haq; Mazhar Ishaq; Ayesha Fawad; Sabahat Arzoo; Kashif Siddique
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  Conventional and transepithelial corneal cross-linking for patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Jing Zhao; Meiyan Li; Mi Tian; Yang Shen; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transepithelial corneal crosslinking in treatment of progressive keratoconus: 12 months' clinical results.

Authors:  Bushra Akbar; Rana Intisar-Ul-Haq; Mazhar Ishaq; Sabahat Arzoo; Kashif Siddique
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 10.  Updates on corneal collagen cross-linking: Indications, techniques and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Ahmad Masoumi; Masoud Mirghorbani; Kianoosh Shahraki; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.