Literature DB >> 26286511

Substrate sources regulate spatial variation of metabolically active methanogens from two contrasting freshwater wetlands.

Yongxin Lin1,2, Deyan Liu1, Weixin Ding3, Hojeong Kang4, Chris Freeman5, Junji Yuan1,2, Jian Xiang1,2.   

Abstract

There is ample evidence that methane (CH4) emissions from natural wetlands exhibit large spatial variations at a field scale. However, little is known about the metabolically active methanogens mediating these differences. We explored the spatial patterns in active methanogens of summer inundated Calamagrostis angustifolia marsh with low CH4 emissions and permanently inundated Carex lasiocarpa marsh with high CH4 emissions in Sanjiang Plain, China. In C. angustifolia marsh, the addition of (13)C-acetate significantly increased the CH4 production rate, and Methanosarcinaceae methanogens were found to participate in the consumption of acetate. In C. lasiocarpa marsh, there was no apparent increase in the CH4 production rate and no methanogen species were labeled with (13)C. When (13)CO2-H2 was added, however, CH4 production was found to be due to Fen Cluster (Methanomicrobiales) in C. angustifolia marsh and Methanobacterium Cluster B (Methanobacteriaceae) together with Fen Cluster in C. lasiocarpa marsh. These results suggested that CH4 was produced primarily by hydrogenotrophic methanogens using substrates mainly derived from plant litter in C. lasiocarpa marsh and by both hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogens using substrates mainly derived from root exudate in C. angustifolia marsh. The significantly lower CH4 emissions measured in situ in C. angustifolia marsh was primarily due to a deficiency of substrates compared to C. lasiocarpa marsh. Therefore, we speculate that the substrate source regulates both the type of active methanogens and the CH4 production pathway and consequently contributes to the spatial variations in CH4 productions observed in these freshwater marshes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active methanogen; Calamagrostis angustifolia; Carex lasiocarpa; Methanogenic process; Substrate source

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26286511     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-015-6912-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  3 in total

1.  Comparative Analyses of Methanogenic and Methanotrophic Communities Between Two Different Water Regimes in Controlled Wetlands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.

Authors:  Hongpeng Cui; Xin Su; Shiping Wei; Youhai Zhu; Zhenquan Lu; Yanfa Wang; Yuejiao Li; Hui Liu; Shuai Zhang; Shouji Pang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Methanogenic Community Was Stable in Two Contrasting Freshwater Marshes Exposed to Elevated Atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  Yongxin Lin; Deyan Liu; Junji Yuan; Guiping Ye; Weixin Ding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Nutrient and acetate amendment leads to acetoclastic methane production and microbial community change in a non-producing Australian coal well.

Authors:  Michiel H In 't Zandt; Sabrina Beckmann; Ruud Rijkers; Mike S M Jetten; Mike Manefield; Cornelia U Welte
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 5.813

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.