Literature DB >> 26286432

Demand, Control and Support at Work Among Sick-Listed Patients with Neck or Back Pain: A Prospective Study.

Kjersti Myhre1, Bjørn Lau2,3, Gunn Hege Marchand4, Gunnar Leivseth4, Erik Bautz-Holter5,6, Cecilie Røe5,6.   

Abstract

Purpose The main aim of this study was to assess changes in perceived demand, control and support at work of neck and back pain patients over 1 year. We also hypothesised that perceived changes in demand, control and support at work were associated with clinical improvement, reduced fear-avoidance beliefs and successful return to work. Methods Four hundred and five sick-listed patients referred to secondary care with neck or back pain were originally included in an interventional study. Of these, two hundred and twenty-six patients reported perceived psychosocial work factors at both baseline and 1-year follow-up, and they were later included in this prospective study. Changes in demand, control and support dimensions were measured by a total of nine variables. Results At the group level, no significant differences were found among the measured subscales. At the individual level, the regression analyses showed that decreases in fear-avoidance beliefs about work were consistently related to decreases in demand and increases in control, whereas decreases in disability, anxiety and depression were related to increases in support subscales. Conclusions The perception of demand, control and support appear to be stable over 1 year in patients with neck and back pain, despite marked improvement in pain and disability. Disability, anxiety, depression and fear-avoidance beliefs about work were significantly associated with the perception of the work environment, whereas neck and back pain were not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal diseases; Psychology; Sick leave; Social support; Work

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26286432     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-015-9602-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  33 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain.

Authors:  Tamar Pincus; A Kim Burton; Steve Vogel; Andy P Field
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Jessica Lang; Elke Ochsmann; Thomas Kraus; Jonas W B Lang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Work and neck pain: a prospective study of psychological, social, and mechanical risk factors.

Authors:  Jan Olav Christensen; Stein Knardahl
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.

Authors:  Aaron Blair; Patricia Stewart; Jay H Lubin; Francesco Forastiere
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Predictors of change in trunk muscle strength for patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises.

Authors:  Anne Keller; Jens Ivar Brox; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Work disability prevention research: current and future prospects.

Authors:  G S Pransky; P Loisel; J R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-09

7.  Predictors of return to work in patients sick listed for sub-acute low back pain: a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Inger Holm; Kari Bø
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men.

Authors:  R Karasek; D Baker; F Marxer; A Ahlbom; T Theorell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Evaluation of the validity of job exposure matrix for psychosocial factors at work.

Authors:  Svetlana Solovieva; Tiina Pensola; Johanna Kausto; Rahman Shiri; Markku Heliövaara; Alex Burdorf; Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen; Eira Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are Work Demand, Support and Control Associated with Work Ability and Disability during Back Pain Treatment? A Prospective Explorative Study.

Authors:  Monica Unsgaard-Tøndel; Anne Lovise Nordstoga
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.