Irene Yu1, Leo Chen2, Jenny Y Ruan2, Jennifer T Chang2, Winson Y Cheung3. 1. Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. 2. Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, 4th Floor, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada. 3. Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, 4th Floor, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada. wcheung@bccancer.bc.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bevacizumab may potentiate the risk of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in cancer patients, who are already predisposed to pro-thrombotic states. We aimed to characterize the incidence of VTEs in a population-based cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab, describe patient and treatment factors associated with VTEs, and examine how VTEs are managed. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with mCRC from 2006 to 2009 and offered bevacizumab were included. Descriptive statistics were used to describe VTE occurrences and management. Univariate and multivariate regression models were constructed to explore associations between clinical factors and VTEs. RESULTS: We identified 541 mCRC patients: 27 never started bevacizumab and 15 were lost to follow-up. Of the 499 evaluable patients, median age was 61, 59.3% were men, 88.1% had ECOG 0/1, and 5.2% reported previous VTEs. Mean number of bevacizumab doses was 13.3 cycles. After receiving bevacizumab, 81 patients developed 93 cases of VTEs, with 9 patients experiencing >1 event. Individuals who experienced VTEs were more likely to have had pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR 2.259, p = 0.0245), resection of primary cancer (OR 3.262, p = 0.0269), pre-chemotherapy platelet count ≥350,000/μL (OR 2.295, p = 0.0293), and received >12 bevacizumab cycles (OR 2.172, p = 0.0158). Use of bevacizumab varied after occurrence of VTE where it was discontinued in 34.4%, continued in 34.4%, and temporarily held in 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: VTE risk can be high, especially in patients with specific pre-treatment risk factors as well as in those who received more bevacizumab, suggesting a potential dose-related effect. Management of bevacizumab-related VTEs was variable.
PURPOSE:Bevacizumab may potentiate the risk of venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) in cancerpatients, who are already predisposed to pro-thrombotic states. We aimed to characterize the incidence of VTEs in a population-based cohort of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab, describe patient and treatment factors associated with VTEs, and examine how VTEs are managed. METHODS:Patients diagnosed with mCRC from 2006 to 2009 and offered bevacizumab were included. Descriptive statistics were used to describe VTE occurrences and management. Univariate and multivariate regression models were constructed to explore associations between clinical factors and VTEs. RESULTS: We identified 541 mCRC patients: 27 never started bevacizumab and 15 were lost to follow-up. Of the 499 evaluable patients, median age was 61, 59.3% were men, 88.1% had ECOG 0/1, and 5.2% reported previous VTEs. Mean number of bevacizumab doses was 13.3 cycles. After receiving bevacizumab, 81 patients developed 93 cases of VTEs, with 9 patients experiencing >1 event. Individuals who experienced VTEs were more likely to have had pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR 2.259, p = 0.0245), resection of primary cancer (OR 3.262, p = 0.0269), pre-chemotherapy platelet count ≥350,000/μL (OR 2.295, p = 0.0293), and received >12 bevacizumab cycles (OR 2.172, p = 0.0158). Use of bevacizumab varied after occurrence of VTE where it was discontinued in 34.4%, continued in 34.4%, and temporarily held in 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS:VTE risk can be high, especially in patients with specific pre-treatment risk factors as well as in those who received more bevacizumab, suggesting a potential dose-related effect. Management of bevacizumab-related VTEs was variable.
Authors: Scott Kopetz; George J Chang; Michael J Overman; Cathy Eng; Daniel J Sargent; David W Larson; Axel Grothey; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; David M Nagorney; Robert R McWilliams Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paolo Prandoni; Franca Bilora; Antonio Marchiori; Enrico Bernardi; Francesco Petrobelli; Anthonie W A Lensing; Martin H Prins; Antonio Girolami Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Herbert I Hurwitz; Niall C Tebbutt; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Bruce J Giantonio; Zhong-Zhen Guan; Lada Mitchell; Daniel Waterkamp; Josep Tabernero Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-07-23
Authors: Herbert I Hurwitz; Leonard B Saltz; Eric Van Cutsem; James Cassidy; Jonas Wiedemann; Florin Sirzén; Gary H Lyman; Ulrich-Peter Rohr Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jwa Hoon Kim; Jeong Eun Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Sun Young Kim; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Ki Eun Choi; Ji Hoon Shin; Tae Won Kim Journal: Chin J Cancer Res Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Steven Ades; Bhargavi Pulluri; Chris E Holmes; Inder Lal; Santosh Kumar; Benjamin Littenberg Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-02-06 Impact factor: 4.711