| Literature DB >> 26285206 |
Ayuma Shimokawabe1, Yuichi Yamaura2, Takumi Akasaka3, Tomonori Sato4, Yuichiro Shida1, Satoshi Yamanaka1, Futoshi Nakamura1.
Abstract
It has recently been proposed that microrefugia played an important role in species survival during past climate change events. However, the current distributions of microrefugia remain largely unknown. Wind-hole sites are areas affected by preferential flows of cool air generated in interstitial spaces created by rock fragments or colluvia. Alpine plant species occurring in lowland wind-hole sites isolated from alpine zones may be relicts of the last glacial period. Hokkaido, northern Japan, is known to contain many wind-hole sites in which alpine plant species can occur. Here we surveyed 55 wind-hole sites in the Kitami region, eastern Hokkaido, and observed two alpine plant species (lingonberry, Vaccinium vitis-idaea, and Labrador tea, Rhododendron groenlandicum ssp. diversipilosum var. diversipilosum) in 14 wind-hole sites. Statistical modeling showed that wind-hole sites are likely to occur in areas with high maximum slope angles and volcanic rock cover, and concave surfaces. Our predictions of wind-hole site distributions suggest that such topographic conditions are common in our study area, and that many undiscovered wind-hole sites exist. Ignoring microhabitats may greatly underestimate species distributions in topographically complex regions, and dispersed cool spots may also function as stepping stones and temporal habitats for cold-adapted species. Because these localized unique habitats usually occur in economically unproductive sites, identifying and protecting potential microrefugia (cool spots) would be a robust and cost-effective mitigation of climate change impacts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26285206 PMCID: PMC4540282 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study area and locations of wind-hole sites.
We successfully located 55 wind-hole sites dispersed throughout the study area. Wind-hole sites with lingonberry (VV), Labrador tea (RG), both species, and without these species (others), are shown using different symbols. This figure is not identical to the original data, and is for representative purposes only.
Fig 2(a) A wind-hole site and (b) its surface temperature measured using a thermal camera.
Areas with accumulated debris had lower temperatures.
AIC values of logistic models for individual covariates.
| Buffer size (m) | 0 | 25 | 50 | 100 |
| Mean slope angle | 1191.7 | 1191.2 | 1187.9 | 1184.7 |
| Mean slope angle squared | 1190.0 | 1181.8 | 1159.6 |
|
| Maximum slope angle | 1191.7 | 1175.1 | 1145.3 |
|
| Curvature | 1182.3 | 1164.5 |
| 1123.5 |
| Buffer size (m) | 200 | 300 | 400 | 500 |
| Mean slope angle | 1183.6 | 1182.0 | 1180.8 | 1180.8 |
| Mean slope angle squared | 1161.1 | 1159.4 | 1161.1 | 1163.0 |
| Maximum slope angle | 1159.4 | 1151.4 | 1150.2 | 1153.1 |
| Curvature | 1128.5 | 1139.4 | 1166.9 | 1165.1 |
| Surface geology (categorical) | 1182.9 | |||
| Surface geology (continuous) |
| |||
| Null model: 1190.9 |
Values with the 0-m buffer were based on calculations generated without buffers. Bold text denotes the lowest AIC for each covariate. For mean slope and its square, the single model with the lowest AIC was selected.
Correlation matrix of selected covariates.
| MeanSA2 | MaxSA | Curv. | Geol. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean slope angle2 (100 m) | 1 | |||
| Maximum slope angle (100 m) | 0.827 | 1 | ||
| Curvature (50 m) | -0.002 | -0.005 | 1 | |
| Surface geology (continuous) | -0.030 | -0.033 | 0.017 | 1 |
Covariate names in columns are abbreviated.
Results of model selection using logistic regressions.
| Parameter estimates | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model # | Intercept | MaxSA | Curv. | Geol. | AIC | ΔAIC |
| 8 | -13.610 | 0.07148 | -1.232 | 1.339 | 1085.6 | 0.00 |
| 6 | -12.600 | 0.06702 | -1.227 | 1103.0 | 17.32 | |
| 4 | -11.170 | -1.861 | 1.268 | 1105.6 | 19.92 | |
| 2 | -10.350 | -1.817 | 1120.7 | 35.05 | ||
| 7 | -14.380 | 0.10010 | 1.303 | 1127.5 | 41.84 | |
| 5 | -13.330 | 0.09443 | 1143.7 | 58.05 | ||
| 3 | -10.540 | 1.150 | 1179.0 | 93.39 | ||
| 1 | -9.808 | 1190.9 | 105.26 | |||
See Table 2 for abbreviated parameter names.
Estimates of MAXLIKE model coefficients.
| Parameter | Estimate | SE |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) 55 site model | ||||
| Intercept | -3.687 | 0.487 | -7.57 | < 0.001 |
| Maximum slope angle (100 m) | 1.393 | 0.396 | 3.52 | < 0.001 |
| Curvature (50 m) | -1.517 | 0.423 | -3.59 | < 0.001 |
| Surface geology (continuous) | 0.963 | 0.279 | 3.46 | < 0.001 |
| (b) 14 site model | ||||
| Intercept | -4.605 | 1.921 | -2.40 | 0.0165 |
| Maximum slope angle (100 m) | 1.238 | 0.559 | 2.22 | 0.0267 |
| Curvature (50 m) | -0.572 | 0.337 | -1.70 | 0.0894 |
| Surface geology (continuous) | 1.320 | 0.527 | 2.50 | 0.0123 |
Note that covariates were standardized before analysis.
Fig 3Predicted occurrence probabilities of wind-hole sites in part of the study area.
See Fig 1 for an explanation of symbols.