Literature DB >> 26284047

Reutericyclin producing Lactobacillus reuteri modulates development of fecal microbiota in weanling pigs.

Yan Yang1, Xin Zhao1, Minh H A Le1, Ruurd T Zijlstra1, Michael G Gänzle2.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus reuteri is used as probiotic culture in food and feed applications; however, strain specific properties of L. reuteri that mediate probiotic activity remain unknown. This study aimed to determine effects of feed fermentation with exopolysaccharide and reutericyclin producing L. reuteri on the transition of the gut microbiome of piglets after weaning. The reutericyclin and reuteran producing L. reuteri TMW1.656 was compared to the reutericyclin negative and levan producing L. reuteri LTH5794 and unfermented controls. Both strains were fermented at conditions supporting exopolysaccharide formation, or at conditions not supporting exopolysaccharide formation. Fecal microbiota were characterized by partial sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, and by quantitative PCR targeting clostridial toxins. The transition to solid food resulted in a transient increase of Proteobacteria to 12% of total bacteria, and increased bacterial diversity by increasing the abundance of anaerobic fiber fermenting Firmicutes. Three weeks after weaning, Prevotella and Lactobacillus were among the dominant bacterial genera. Feed fermentation with L. reuteri affected the abundance of few bacterial taxa and particularly reduced the abundance of Enterobacteriaceae (P < 0.05) when compared to unfermented controls. Reutericyclin producing L. reuteri increased the abundance of Dialister spp. and Mitsuokella spp. (P < 0.05) but did not influence the abundance of clostridial toxins in the feces. In conclusion, data on the contribution of specific metabolic activities of L. reuteri to probiotic activity will facilitate the strain selection for probiotic applications in food and feed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ETEC; Lactobacillus reuteri; enterterotoxigenic Escherichia coli; exopolysaccharides; feed fermentation; pigs; probiotic; reutericyclin

Year:  2015        PMID: 26284047      PMCID: PMC4516970          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Lactobacillus reuteri is a host-specific intestinal symbiont of humans and vertebrate animals (Walter, 2008; Frese et al., 2011). L. reuteri is commercially applied in cereal fermentations (Brandt, 2014) and as probiotic culture (Tuohy et al., 2003). Strain- or lineage specific metabolic traits of L. reuteri mediate host-specific colonization (Frese et al., 2014; Wilson et al., 2014), and contribute to its competitiveness in cereal fermentations and improved bread quality (Galle et al., 2012; Lin and Gänzle, 2014; Zhao et al., 2015). Strain specific properties of L. reuteri that mediate probiotic activity, however, remain unknown. Metabolic traits that were suggested to mediate probiotic activity of L. reuteri include acid resistance (Teixeira et al., 2014), histamine decarboxylation (Spinler et al., 2014), exopolysaccharide production (Chen et al., 2014), and antimicrobial activity against pathogens (Gänzle, 2004; Rea et al., 2014). Reuteran and levan from L. reuteri prevented adhesion of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in vitro, and reduced mucosa-adherent ETEC in a swine model (Wang et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2014). The production of reuterin and reutericyclin by L. reuteri were proposed to provide protection against Salmonella Typhimurium and Clostridium difficile, respectively (Hurdle et al., 2011; De Weirdt et al., 2012). However, only two studies performed in rodent models demonstrate that antimicrobial compounds from lactic acid bacteria are active in vivo. Bacteriocin production by probiotic lactic acid bacteria reduced infection by Listeria monocytogenes (Corr et al., 2007), and reduced colonization by vancomycin resistant enterococci (Millette et al., 2008). Evidence for activity of antimicrobial metabolites of probiotics against autochtonous microbiota is inconclusive. The bacteriocin producing L. salivarius Abp118 altered the gut microbiome of swine and mice when compared to controls that did not receive probiotics. Changes induced by the bacteriocin producing strain, however, were not different from those induced by a bacteriocin-negative derivative of the same strain (Riboulet-Bisson et al., 2012). Probiotic applications of L. reuteri and related organisms specifically targeted piglets (Konstantinov et al., 2008). Gut microbiota of pigs undergo a transition after weaning (Konstantinov et al., 2006; Lallès et al., 2007). The microbiome of suckling pigs is dominated by lactobacilli (Konstantinov et al., 2006) while strict anaerobic Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominate the microbiome of adult pigs (Lamendella et al., 2011; Riboulet-Bisson et al., 2012). The abundance of lactobacilli decreases after weaning (Konstantinov et al., 2006), providing opportunity for overgrowth of pathogens. Probiotics may decrease the abundance of pathogens (Zhang et al., 2010; Bednorz et al., 2013). Supplementation with L. amylovorus reduced levels of ETEC in the intestine but did not alter the hindgut microbiome (Konstantinov et al., 2008; Su et al., 2008). This study aimed to determine the effect of feed fermentation with L. reuteri on the development of the gut microbiome in weanling piglets. The experimental design aimed to determine the contribution of viable L. reuteri, exopolysaccharide formation by L. reuteri, and reutericyclin formation by L. reuteri on the evolution of the gut microbiome in weanling piglets. The fecal microbiome was characterized by high throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes, and by quantitative PCR (qPCR) specifically targeting C. difficile, C. perfringens, and toxins produced by these organisms.

Materials and methods

Feed fermentation and diet preparation

Wheat flour was provided by University of Alberta Swine Research and Technology Centre, mixed with an equal amount of tap water, and inoculated with approximately 107 CFU g−1 of the levan-producing L. reuteri LTH5794 or the reuteran-producing L. reuteri TMW1.656. A more detailed account of the feed fermentation and the control experiments ensuring the identity of fermentation microbiota with the inoculum is provided by Yang et al. (2015). Feed fermentation was carried out with addition of 10% (w/w flour) sucrose to support levan or reuteran formation during fermentation, or addition of 5% (w/w flour) glucose and 5% (w/w flour) fructose, which do not support reuteran or levan formation by L. reuteri but result in a formation of comparable levels of lactic and acetic acids. A chemically acidified control was prepared with 5% (w/w flour) fructose, 5% glucose (w/w flour), and addition of lactic acid (80%) and glacial acidic acid in a ratio of 4:1 (v/v) to acidify the feed to a pH of 3.8 (Table 1). Basal diets were mixed with 20–50% fermented or acidified wheat to produce the experimental feeds. Control diet was obtained by a mixture of basal diet and unfermented wheat. All diets were formulated to meet or exceed nutrient recommendation of National Research Council Canada (NRC) (2012) for 5–10 kg pigs. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) was added to each of the test diets as an indigestible marker.
Table 1

Experimental diets used in this study.

ComponentsControlChem. acidL. reuteri
TMW1.656LTH 5794
SucroseGlu + FruSucroseGlu + Fru
Acids+++++
L. reuteri++++
Reutericyclin++
Reuteran+
Levan+

+ means component present in the diet, − means component not present in the diet.

Experimental diets used in this study. + means component present in the diet, − means component not present in the diet.

Animals and experimental design

This animal trial was approved by the University of Alberta Animal Care and Use Committee under the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and was conducted at the University of Alberta Swine Research and Technology Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada. A total of 36 crossbred castrated weaning male pigs (~21 d of age) were selected and housed in a temperature-controlled room (28 ± 2.5°C). Pigs were divided into six consecutive and similar blocks with six pigs per block and one pig per pen (0.5 × 1.22 m). The experiment was designed to indicate whether the bacterial metabolites lactic and acetic acid, reuteran, levan, or reutericyclin influence the evolution of gut microbiota (Table 1). One pig per block was assigned to one of the six diets for a total of six observations per diet (Yang et al., 2015). Pigs were offered ad libitum food and water intake allowing for adequate growth. Meals in mash form were provided in equal amount twice daily (at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.). Fresh fecal samples were collected from the pen floor in a sterile plastic bag at weaning, and 1, 2, or 3 weeks after weaning. A total of 137 samples obtained were collected and stored at −20°C. Frozen samples were thawed, mixed aseptically by spatula and 2–3 g subsamples were stored at −80°C.

DNA extraction

Bacterial DNA was extracted from fecal samples using QIAamp® DNA stool Mini kit (50) (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. Fecal DNA was quantified by Nano-Drop spectrophotometer system ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, USA). DNA quality was assessed by determining the ratio of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. Only DNA samples that had 260:280 nm ratios higher than 1.8 were used for further analysis.

PCR primers and probes

Primers and probes used in this study are listed in Table 2. Sequences of genes coding for clostridial toxins (α-, β-, β2-, entero-, and ι-toxin) collected from GeneBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank). The sequence data were aligned with CLUSTAL-W (Thompson et al., 1994) to identify conserved sequences. Primers and probes were designed to target the conserved toxin sequences. The specificity of primer sequences was checked by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi). Primers and probes were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, U.S.A.).
Table 2

Oligonucleotide sequences of the primers and probes used in this study.

Target group/genePrimer/probeOligonucleotide sequence (5′−3′)*TA (°C)aProduct size (bp)References
Clostridium cluster ICI FGTGAAATGCGTAGAGATTAGGAA58665Le Bourhis et al., 2005
CI RGATYYGCGATTACTAGYAACTC
Clostridium cluster XICXI FACGGTACTTGAGGAGGA58139Schwab et al., 2011, this study
CXI RGAGCCGTAGCCTTTCACT
Total bacteriaHDA FACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAGT62198Walter et al., 2000
HDA RGTATTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC
C. perfringens α toxin (cpa)CPα FCTTGGAGAGGCTATGCACTATTT6090This study
CPα P6FAM-CCATATCATCCTGCTAATGTTACTGCCGT-TAMRA
CPα RCTTAACATGTCCTGCGCTATCA
C. perfringens β toxin (cpb)CPβ FTCAAACAACCCTGTATATGGAAATG60149This study
CPβ P6FAM-ACGGAAGATATACTAATGTTCCTGCAACTG-TAMRA
CPβ RGGAGCAGTTAGAACTACAGACAT
C. perfringens β-2 toxin (cpb2)CPβ2 FTGCAACTTCAGGTTCAAGAGA60121This study
CPβ2 P6FAM-ACCATTTGAGAAGCTTTAACATCATCTCCC-TAMRA
CPβ2 RTTGTCTAGCAGAATCAGGGTTT
C. perfringens enterotoxin (cpe)CPe FAGCTGCTGCTACAGAAAGATTA60101This study
CPe P6FAM-CTGATGCATTAAACTCAAATCCAGCTGGT-TAMRA
CPe RGAGTCCAAGGGTATGAGTTAGAAG
C. perfringens ι toxin (iap)CPia FCGTGGAGGATATACCGCAAT60116This study
CPia P6FAM-TGGTCCTTTAAATAATCCTAATCCA-TAMRA
CPia RGGTGTGAGCTTTAATGCGTTT
C. perfringens ε toxin (etx)CP etx FAGCTTTTCCTAGGGATGGTTA58112Messelhäußer et al., 2007
CP etx RAACTGCACTATAATTTCCTTTTCC
C. difficile toxin B (tcdB)CD tcdB FGAAAGTCCAAGTTTACGCTCAAT56176van den Berg et al., 2006
CD tcdB P6FAM-ACAGATGCAGCCAAAGTTGTTGAATT-TAMRA
CD tcdB RGCTGCACCTAAACTTACACCA

Y = T/C. F, Forward; R, Reverse; P, Probe.

Annealing temperature.

Oligonucleotide sequences of the primers and probes used in this study. Y = T/C. F, Forward; R, Reverse; P, Probe. Annealing temperature.

Quantification of clostridia and their toxins by qPCR

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using methodology described earlier (Metzler-Zebeli et al., 2010). To obtain positive controls for primers and probes targeting clostridial toxins, gBlocks® Gene Fragments were designed and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies. Standard curves for quantification of toxin genes were generated with 10-fold serial dilutions of purified PCR amplicons, which were amplified from gBlocks® Gene Fragments with the same primer pair and probe. For quantification of eubacteria and Clostridium clusters, standard curves were generated with amplicons that were amplified from serial dilutions of fecal DNA. The concentration of amplicons was determined by Nano-Drop spectrophotometer system ND-1000. Fecal DNA was diluted to a concentration of 100 mg/L and analyzed in duplicate in a MicroAmp Fast Optical 96-well reaction plate sealed with MicroAmp Optical Adhesive Film (Applied Biosystems). Genes coding for 16S rRNA and the ε-toxin were amplified with the Quanti Fast SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems). Taqman Fast master mix (Applied Biosystems) was used for detection of other toxins with probes. qPCR reaction contained 12.5 μL master mix, 4 μL of 10 μM primer solution in water, 2 μL of template DNA, and 6.5 μL nuclease-free water. Amplification of target sequences was achieved in 40 PCR cycles with primer annealing temperatures as shown in Table 2. Specific amplification of the target DNA was verified by melting curve analysis where applicable and by determination of the size of the amplicons by agarose gel electrophoresis.

Sequencing of 16S rRNA sequence tags and sequence data analysis

High throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA sequence tags was performed by the University of Minnesota Genomics Center (Minneapolis, MN, USA) on a Illumina MiSeq. The V1–V3 regions of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using primers Meta_V1_27F (TCGTCGGCA GCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG) and Meta_V3_534R (GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG ATTACCGCGG CTGCTGG). The bold part of each primer is complementary to the eukaryotic 16S sequences while upstream sequences corresponded to Illumina adapters that are required for sequencing and multiplexing. Paired-end sequencing was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The QIIME pipeline (MacQIIME 1.8.0 20140103 OS10.6) (Caporaso et al., 2010) was used to analyze the sequences of 16S rRNA genes. PANDAseq (Masella et al., 2012) was used for quality filtering and assembly of the two ends of each read into contigs. Pairs with miscalled or uncalled bases in the overlapping region were discarded. Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were generated using the UPARSE workflow (Edgar, 2013). Briefly, all sequences were merged into a single file, and the library name was used for multiplexing. To minimize computing time, sequences were dereplicated and sorted by abundance. Unique sequences in the data set were discarded. Sequences were clustered into OTUs by USEARCH (Edgar, 2010) using the Greengenes reference database (release October 2013), and a 97% similarity threshold. UCHIME (Edgar, 2010; Edgar et al., 2011) was used for filtering of chimeric sequences. OTUs with abundance below 0.005% of the total number of sequences were discarded (Bokulich et al., 2013). Downstream analyses including taxonomy assignments, and alpha and beta diversity estimations were conducted using the QIIME workflow core_diversity_analysis.py, with a sampling depth of 7939 (Navas-Molina et al., 2013). This analysis was conducted with default parameters: taxonomy was assigned using Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Classifier V2 (Wang et al., 2007), alpha diversity was estimated by Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) Whole Tree, Chao 1 and Observed Species indices (Colwell et al., 2012), beta-diversity was estimated through UniFrac distances (Vázquez-Baeza et al., 2013).

Statistical methods

Data analyses of relative abundance and qPCR results were performed in SAS, (version 9.3, SAS Institute, 2012). The gene copy numbers of Clostridium cluster I and XI were converted into percentage of total bacteria gene counts for analysis. Mixed Procedure (Proc MIXED) was used based on randomized complete block design with repeated measurement. In the model, diet and week and diet × week were considered as fixed effects, while block was considered as random effect and pigs were considered as experimental unit. Comparisons of treatments were determined by contrast of target groups (SAS version 9.3). For relative abundance analysis, data obtained at weaning were used as covariate when comparing the difference between combination groups to assess the effects of L. reuteri and its metabolites exopolysaccharides and reutericyclin. To test hypotheses, p < 0.05 was considered significant, after Bonferroni-adjustment. Normality of all variables was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test (Young, 1977). Results are presented as means ± standard deviation. Alpha- and beta- diversity were analyzed in MacQIIME v1.8.

Results

Effects of diet on animal health

All pigs remained healthy during the experiment period and diarrhea or any clinical signs of disease were not observed. Prior analyses of samples obtained in the same study reported the strain-specific quantification of L. reuteri and ETEC but not the overall composition of the hindgut microbiome (Yang et al., 2015).

Diversity of the fecal microbiome of piglets

During the feeding trial, 137 fecal samples were collected and a total of 5,292,722 sequences with a minimum of 7939 sequences per sample were obtained. A total of 7434 OTUs were identified, representing 6 phyla, 27 families, 42 genera, and 49 species. Phyla in fecal samples and their abundance included Bacteroidetes (40.8–45.8%), Firmicutes (35.8–45.1%), Proteobacteria (0.9–12.9%), Tenericutes (0.7–5.2%), Spirochaetes (1.4–3.1%), and Planctomycetes (0–1.3%). Alpha and beta diversity analyses revealed that the effects of treatments were small when compared to the differences occurring over time. In Alpha diversity metrics (within sample diversity), species richness of samples taken at week 3 was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the diversity of samples taken earlier in the experiment (Figure 1) but differences between diets were not significant (p > 0.05). Beta diversity (between sample diversity) also demonstrated that samples taken at different times differed (p < 0.0001) (Figure 2). The distances between samples within each week were always smaller than the between week comparisons (Figure 2).
Figure 1

Rarefaction curves indicating the effect of the number of partial sequences of 16S rRNA genes that were analyzed on the number of OUT's in fecal microbiota of pigs. Rarefaction curves were calculated in QIIME with the sample depth of 7939 sequences per sample from 137 fecal samples obtained at weaning (week 0, n = 29), or at week 1 (n = 36), week 2 (n = 36), and week 3 (n = 36) after weaning.

Figure 2

Principle coordinate analysis (PCA) of the bacterial microbiota of piglets. The PCA plot was generated using the unweighted UniFrac distance metric. Each dot represents an individual sample collected at the start of weaning week 0 (n = 29) or after week 1 (n = 36), week 2 (n = 36), and week 3 (n = 36) of weaning.

Rarefaction curves indicating the effect of the number of partial sequences of 16S rRNA genes that were analyzed on the number of OUT's in fecal microbiota of pigs. Rarefaction curves were calculated in QIIME with the sample depth of 7939 sequences per sample from 137 fecal samples obtained at weaning (week 0, n = 29), or at week 1 (n = 36), week 2 (n = 36), and week 3 (n = 36) after weaning. Principle coordinate analysis (PCA) of the bacterial microbiota of piglets. The PCA plot was generated using the unweighted UniFrac distance metric. Each dot represents an individual sample collected at the start of weaning week 0 (n = 29) or after week 1 (n = 36), week 2 (n = 36), and week 3 (n = 36) of weaning.

Transition of bacteria over time and prevalent bacterial genera

The fecal microbiome was characterized by analysis of the relative abundance of bacterial taxa at the phylum level (Figure 3) and at the genus level (Table 3). The proportion of Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes remained unchanged over the study period. Major shifts were observed in the Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, and Planctomycetes (Figure 3). Proteobacteria peaked at week 1 and 2 and decreased again at week 3; Tenericutes and Planctomycetes increased over time (Figure 3). Within the Bacteroidetes, Prevotella and the unassigned S24-7 genus increased while Bacteroides and other unknown genera decreased (Table 3). The overall increase of microbial diversity (Figure 1) was largely attributed to increased abundance and diversity of bacterial taxa in the Firmicutes. Changes in the Proteobacteria were mainly attributable to Enterobacteriaceae (compare Table 3 and Figure 3).
Figure 3

Composition of fecal microbiota at the phylum level at weaning, and during the first 3 weeks after weaning. Data represent the median proportions of each phylum as determined by the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) classifier. The phyla are represented by symbols as follows: ●, Bacteroidetes; ▴, Firmicutes; , Proteobacteria; Δ, Spirochaetes; ■ , Tenericutes; , Planctomycetes; ♦, unassigned.

Table 3

Relative abundance (%) of bacterial genera in fecal microbiota of pigs at weaning (week 0) and at week 1, 2, or 3 after weaning, determined by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tags.

GenusWeek 0Week 1Week 2Week 3
BACTEROIDETES
Bacteroides13±2.6NDNDND
Parabacteroides2.2±4.3ab3.1±2.6a1.7±0.8b1.2±0.43b
Prevotella8.1±0.71a9.6±1.1ab14±1.0b20±2.8c
[F: S24-7]3.9±2.6a10±5.5b15±6.9c15±0.45c
CF231NDNDND0.47±0.39
[F: Paraprevotellaceae]ND2.3±1.0a0.6±0.07b1.3±0.7b
Other (O: Bacteroidales)11±22NDNDND
[O: Bacteroidales]1.7±0.04aND1.7±0.04a3.2±1.5b
[F: P-2534-18B5]5.4±0.01a16±32b14±10b3.9±3.1a
FIRMICUTES
Lactobacillus8.2±15a12±1.3ab15±5.1b11±11ab
Other (O: Clostridiales)ND1.1±0.2aND0.2±0.04a
[O: Clostridiales]4.0±3.6ab4.4±11a1.8±1.7b6.5±4.1a
[F: Christensenellaceae]2.0±0.14a2.9±11a1.6±1.2a0.59±0.51a
[F: Clostridiaceae]NDNDND0.46±0.02
BlautiaNDNDND0.47±0.08
CoprococcusND0.9±1.7a2.4±0.43a0.86±0.57a
LachnospiraNDND1.1±0.16a0.82±0.07a
Roseburia1.3±1.7aND0.3±0.02b1.1±0.32a
Other (F: Lachnospiraceae)2.6±0.32aND0.47±0bND
[F: Lachnospiraceae]3.8±1.6a4.6±3.7a2.2±1.6b2.9±0.74ab
FaecalibacteriumNDND1.0±0.29a0.7±0.09b
Oscillospira1.4±0.89aND0.41±0.12b1.5±0.22a
[F: Ruminococcaceae]18±7.0a6.7±0.4b4.93±2.7b5.7±0.75b
DialisterNDNDND1.1±0.01
MegasphaeraND0.8±0.04a2.6±0.01ab3.7±0.03b
MitsuokellaNDNDND1.1±0
BulleidiaNDND1.1±0.08a0.84±0.11a
CatenibacteriumNDND0.52±0a0.46±0.06a
Eubacterium0.48±0.28aNDND0.41±0.01a
p-75-a52.0±1.3a1.6±1.5a2.0±0.92a1.1±0.66a
PLANCTOMYCETES
[F: Pirellulaceae]ND1.4±0.2aND0.5±0.68b
PROTEOBACTERIA
Desulfovibrio1.36±0.32NDNDND
SuccinivibrioND3.1±0.27aND0.38±0.63b
[F: Enterobacteriaceae]5.0±2.7ab9.1±15a9±16a0.48±0.03b
SPIROCHAETES
Treponema2.1±0.85ab3.5±1.2a1.6±5.4b1.9±0.52b
TENERICUTES
[O: RF39]1.1±0.26a4.7±2.8b2.3±1.4a5.4±1.1b
UnassignedND1.8±0.28a2.3±0.36a4.0±2.6b
Total97.9699.6199.6100

Data are presented as means ± standard deviation of 29 (week 0) or 36 (weeks 1, 2, and 3) observations.

Data in the same row that do not share a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05). ND, not detected.

Unassigned genera are presented with upper level of family (F) or order (O) in square brackets. “Unassigned” means a good hit to a particular sequence, but that sequence has a poorly defined taxonomy itself at the genus level. “Other” means the assignment is ambiguous.

Composition of fecal microbiota at the phylum level at weaning, and during the first 3 weeks after weaning. Data represent the median proportions of each phylum as determined by the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) classifier. The phyla are represented by symbols as follows: ●, Bacteroidetes; ▴, Firmicutes; , Proteobacteria; Δ, Spirochaetes; ■ , Tenericutes; , Planctomycetes; ♦, unassigned. Relative abundance (%) of bacterial genera in fecal microbiota of pigs at weaning (week 0) and at week 1, 2, or 3 after weaning, determined by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tags. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation of 29 (week 0) or 36 (weeks 1, 2, and 3) observations. Data in the same row that do not share a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05). ND, not detected. Unassigned genera are presented with upper level of family (F) or order (O) in square brackets. “Unassigned” means a good hit to a particular sequence, but that sequence has a poorly defined taxonomy itself at the genus level. “Other” means the assignment is ambiguous.

Clostridia clusters and toxins quantified by qPCR

To determine effects of feed fermentation on the Clostridium cluster I and XI, these organisms and toxins produced by C. difficile and C. perfringens were quantified using qPCR (Table 4 and data not shown). Both Clostridium clusters were relatively abundant in fecal samples; changes over time or changes within diets, however, were not significant (p > 0.05; data not shown). The α- and β-2 toxins from C. perfringens were detected in samples collected at week 0 and in a few samples from week 1 but not in samples taken at later times. Differences in the abundance of toxins in samples from animals fed different diets were not significant (p > 0.05). The abundance of other clostridial toxins, namely the β-, entero-, ι-, and ε-toxin of C. perfringens and the C. difficile toxin B, was below the detection limit of 3.6 log(copy number/g) in all samples (Table 4).
Table 4

Quantification of alpha and beta-2 toxins of .

Dietsα toxin log(copy number/g)β-2 toxin log(copy number/g)
Week 0Week 1Weeks 2 and 3Week 0Week 1Weeks 2 and 3
Control6.9 ± 1.4 (6/6)a4.2 ± 0.5 (6/6)NDb6.2 ± 1.2 (6/6)3.9 ± 0.5 (3/6)ND
Chem. Acid6.3 ± 0.8 (6/6)3.8 ± 0.2 (2/6)ND5.6 ± 0.8 (6/6)3.6 (1/6)ND
TMW1.656 sucrose6.6 ± 1.1 (4/4)4.2 ± 0.3 (3/6)ND5.8 ± 0.9 (4/4)3.7 ± 0.2 (3/6)ND
TMW1.656 Glu+Fru6.7 ± 1.1 (2/2)3.9 ± 0.1 (4/6)ND5.6 ± 0.3 (2/2)3.6 (1/6)ND
LTH5794 sucrose7.0 ± 0.4 (5/5)4.2 ± 0.3 (4/6)ND6.3 ± 0.3 (5/5)3.8 ± 0.1 (2/6)ND
LTH5794 GluFru6.6 ± 1.2 (5/5)3.8 ± 0.5 (4/6)ND5.9 ± 1.2 (5/5)3.8 ± 0 (2/6)ND

Data are presented as log(copy number/g feces) and reported as means ± standard deviation of positive samples.

Data are reported as means ± standard deviation of positive samples. The number in brackets indicates the (number of positive samples/number of samples analyzed).

ND, not detected [below the detection limit of 3.6 log(copy number/g)].

Quantification of alpha and beta-2 toxins of . Data are presented as log(copy number/g feces) and reported as means ± standard deviation of positive samples. Data are reported as means ± standard deviation of positive samples. The number in brackets indicates the (number of positive samples/number of samples analyzed). ND, not detected [below the detection limit of 3.6 log(copy number/g)].

Effects of treatments on bacteria species

Analysis of diet-induced changes accounted for the individual differences between animals in the same group by using data from each pig at week 0 as covariate (Table 5). To analyse the effect of specific feed components or metabolites that were present in several diets, diets were grouped as follows: Diets containing L. reuteri (groups 3, 4, 5, and 6) or not (group 1 and 2); diets containing reutericyclin (groups 3 and 4) or not (groups 1, 2, 5, and 6), and diets containing exopolysaccharides (groups 3 and 5) or not (groups 1, 2, 4, and 6). Moreover, the impact of feed fermented with L. reuteri TMW1.656 was compared to L. reuteri LTH5794 (Table 5).
Table 5

Effects of diets and reutericyclin producing .

VariablesEffects of diets (relative abundance%)Effects of L. reuteri (P-value)
SpeciesControlChem. acidifiedLTH5794 sucroseLTH5794 Glu /+ FruTHW1.656 sucroseTMW1.656 Glu/+FruTMW1.656 vs LTH5794TMW1.656 vs other dietsL. reuteri vs no bacteria
BACTEROIDETES
[G: Prevotella]6.63±2.99B12.8±6.71A6.23±2.22B8.23±4.56AB6.06±2.58B5.05±3.3B0.680.270.07
Copri10.4±8.44AB5.62±3.54A14.2±5.88AB8.59±6.46AB16.9±7.38B11.1±6.56AB0.870.460.16
[F: S24-7]19.4±7.4214.0±1.4716.4±2.6416.5±3.2711.7±3.9313.88±6.10.090.060.22
[G: CF231]0.48±0.310.95±0.430.22±0.190.46±0.460.3±0.230.38±0.210.960.310.02
[F: p-2534-18B5]5.18±4.912.5±1.564.16±3.663.3±3.593.47±6.014.72±6.03< 0.0001< 0.0001< 0.0001
FIRMICUTES
[O: Clostridiales]4.96±2.084.26±1.486.68±2.678.89±3.966.76±2.537.22±3.880.640.470.02
[G: Coprococcus]0.14±0.250.2±0.31.52±1.41.21±1.731.36±3.250.73±0.650.0490.350.07
[G: Oscillospira]2.58±1.081.4±0.451.46±0.451.29±0.381.16±0.691.08±0.510.880.430.03
[G: Dialister]0.19±0.37A0.03±0.06A0.02±0.03A0.38±0.86A4.37±7.08B1.72±3.08AB0.100.060.20
[G: Mitsuokella]0.35±0.35AB0.07±0.12A0.16±0.2A0.15±0.24A3.74±5.43C2.2±0.86BC0.0001< 0.00010.01
PROTEOBACTERIA
[F: Enterobacteriaceae]1.22±1.450.89±1.110.42±0.590.05±0.050.21±0.420.09±0.130.830.210.01

Effects of diets were analyzed based on the relative abundance of bacteria groups. To analyse effects of reutericyclin producing L. reuteri, data obtained at weaning (week 0) of each pig sample are used as covariate when P-value was calculated. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation of 29 (week 0) or 36 (weeks 1, 2, and 3) observations and significant effects are shown.

Data in the same row that do not share a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Data indicating the effects of L. reuteri or reutericyclin are presented as P-value. P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant difference. ND means not detected. Unassigned species are presented as square brackets with upper level of genus (G), family (F), or order (O).

Effects of diets and reutericyclin producing . Effects of diets were analyzed based on the relative abundance of bacteria groups. To analyse effects of reutericyclin producing L. reuteri, data obtained at weaning (week 0) of each pig sample are used as covariate when P-value was calculated. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation of 29 (week 0) or 36 (weeks 1, 2, and 3) observations and significant effects are shown. Data in the same row that do not share a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05). Data indicating the effects of L. reuteri or reutericyclin are presented as P-value. P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant difference. ND means not detected. Unassigned species are presented as square brackets with upper level of genus (G), family (F), or order (O). Significant differences between individual diets pertain to few bacterial taxa in the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes (Table 5). Any L. reuteri strain altered the abundance of 6 bacterial taxa when compared to the control diets (Table 5). These changes particularly included a reduced number of the family Enterobacteriacae. Diets containing reutericyclin significantly changed the abundance of a Mitsuokella species and a family in the phylum Bacteroidetes (Table 5); these differences were also significant when the reutericyclin negative strain L. reuteri LTH5794 was compared to the reutericyclin positive L. reuteri TMW1.656 (Table 5). The presence or absence of exopolysaccharides had no significant (p > 0.05) influence on any bacterial taxon.

Discussion

The study investigated the effect of L. reuteri fermented diets on the development of intestinal microbiota of pigs after weaning. The experimental design aimed to determine the contribution of specific metabolites, i.e., reuteran, levan, and reutericyclin, on the evolution of the intestinal microbiome. The present study is the first employing high throughput sequencing to document the transition of the microbiome of piglets. In contrast, the development of the infant microbiota after birth is well documented (Koenig et al., 2011; La Rosa et al., 2014). The infant microbiome is characterized by low diversity and stability. Important determinants of the infant gut microbiome include the mode of delivery, type of feeding, antibiotic use, and the gestational age of the mother (Penders et al., 2006; Koenig et al., 2011). From birth to weaning, both human infants and piglets experience a succession of Lactobacillus spp. in the gut due to the consumption of milk (Tannock et al., 1990; Roger et al., 2010). The gradual adaptation of the diet in infants typically avoids major problems that are associated with a shifting microbiome. The sudden change of diet after weaning, however, often causes dysbiosis and diarrheal diseases in piglets, and is thus a major concern in pig production (Lallès et al., 2007). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes dominated the intestinal microbiome in piglets, in keeping with past studies on the swine microbiome (Leser et al., 2002; Lamendella et al., 2011; Riboulet-Bisson et al., 2012). The present study additionally documents that strict anaerobes such as Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroides, and Prevotella were the dominant bacteria at weaning. After weaning, Lactobacillus and Prevotella spp. replaced Ruminococcaceae and Bacteroides as the most abundant bacterial genera. Dietary changes modulate the gut microbiome of pigs (Lu et al., 2014). Bacteria belonging to Bacteroides-Prevotella-Porphyromonas play an important role in fiber degradation, and are stimulated by fermentable non-starch polysaccharides in pig diets (Metzler-Zebeli et al., 2010; Ivarsson et al., 2014). Human studies have linked the diversity of different plant fibers in whole grains to an increased diversity of the gut microbiome, particularly in the genera Roseburia, Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium, and Dialister (Martínez et al., 2013). Accordingly, low carbohydrate diets resulted in a substantial and diet-dependent reduction of Firmicutes (Duncan et al., 2008). The increase of bacterial diversity after weaning was particularly attributable to an increased diversity in the phylym Firmicutes and may thus be linked to the presence of whole wheat in the piglets' diet, which accounted for 20% of the diet after weaning and for 50% diet after week 1 (Yang et al., 2015). The strains of L. reuteri used in the present study are rodent-lineage allochthones to the pig intestine (Su et al., 2012; Frese et al., 2014). Major changes in the intestinal microbiota were attributable to the presence of probiotic L. reuteri and its metabolites. The most prominent change attributable to the presence of L. reuteri was the reduced abundance of Enterobacteriaceae. This result conforms to prior reports obtained with diverse probiotic cultures (De Angelis et al., 2007; Konstantinov et al., 2008; Bednorz et al., 2013; Valdovska et al., 2014) and indicates that successful competition with Enterobacteriaceae is not a specific property of L. reuteri. Remarkably, this study also demonstrated that the abundance of several members of the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes was influenced by L. reuteri. Exopolysaccharides did not influence the composition of gut microbiota. Levan and reuteran are not digested by pancreatic digestive enzymes and selectively fermented by hindgut microbiota (Korakli et al., 2002; van Bueren et al., 2015). However, the exopolysaccharides levels in the feed used in this study, 1–3 g/kg feed (Yang et al., 2015), are low when compared to other studies reporting prebiotic intervention (Valdovska et al., 2014). Fermented feed containing reuteran, however, specifically reduced the abundance of enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) in weanling piglets (Yang et al., 2015). The lack of any effect of reuteran on the overall composition of the gut microbiome (this study) coupled to the specific reduction of ETEC colonization (Yang et al., 2015) supports the hypothesis that effects of reuteran are mediated by a specific reduction of ETEC adhesion rather than a prebiotic effect (Chen et al., 2014). Bioinformatic analyses of the metagenome of intestinal microbiota suggested that the ecology of colonic microbiota is shaped by competition for substrates rather than the production of antimicrobial compounds (Walter and Ley, 2011; Zheng et al., 2015). Accordingly, bacteriocin producing L. salivarius did not induce significant changes in the gut microbiome of pigs when compared to an isogenic bacteriocin-negative strain (Riboulet-Bisson et al., 2012). Medication of grower pigs with in feed antibiotics (Chlortetracycline, sulfamethazine, and penicillin), however, caused much more substantial changes of the colonic microbiome than was observed in this study for reutericyclin (Looft et al., 2014). Reutericyclin is a unique antimicrobial compound with broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive bacteria (Gänzle et al., 2000; Gänzle, 2004; Hurdle et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2015). Reutericyclin is produced during growth of L. reuteri in wheat sourdough (Gänzle and Vogel, 2002), suggesting that feed fermentation with L. reuteri TMW1.656 delivers active concentrations of reutericyclin to the swine gut. We hypothesized that reutericyclin may reduce the abundance of the Clostridium clusters I and XI. The pathogenic species C. perfringens (cluster I) and C. difficile (cluster XI), are sensitive to reutericyclin (Hurdle et al., 2011; Hofstetter et al., 2013). However, neither the abundance of Clostridium cluster I and XI nor the abundance of genes coding for clostridial toxins was influenced by reutericyclin-producing L. reuteri. The abundance of Dialister and Mitsuokella increased upon feeding of the reutericyclin producing L. reuteri TMW1.656, possibly as a consequence of the inhibition of reutericyclin-sensitive competitors. In conclusion, the present study monitored the transition of fecal microbiota of weanling piglets, and determined the impact of L. reuteri and its metabolites on this transition of intestinal microbiota. After weaning, bacterial diversity increased, mainly due to an increase of bacterial taxa in the phylum Firmicutes. Weaning was also associated by a transient increase of Enterobacteriaceae, which corresponds to the susceptibility of weanling piglets to infection by enteric pathogens. The gut microbiome of weanling piglets was not influenced by the inclusion of organic acids in the diet; however, the presence of viable L. reuteri, reutericyclin, and reuteran all affected the gut microbiome. Probiotic L. reuteri altered the abundance of several bacterial taxa, notably Enterobacteriaceae including E. coli. The reutericyclin producing strain significantly increased the abundance of two strict anaerobic members of the Firmicutes, while reuteran affected the colonization with ETEC but none of the numerically dominant members of fecal microbiota (Yang et al., 2015, this study). Data on the contribution of specific metabolic activities of L. reuteri to probiotic activity will facilitate the strain selection for probiotic feed applications in animal production. The study also novel opens novel avenues to reduce the incidence of childhood diarrhea in developing countries (Thapar and Sanderson, 2004) by application of probiotic cultures, or by food fermentations with probiotic L. reuteri (Sekwati-Monang and Gänzle, 2011).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  66 in total

Review 1.  Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research.

Authors:  Jens Walter
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Exopolysaccharide synthesized by Lactobacillus reuteri decreases the ability of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to bind to porcine erythrocytes.

Authors:  Yvonne Wang; Michael G Gänzle; Clarissa Schwab
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome at different gut locations.

Authors:  Torey Looft; Heather K Allen; Brandi L Cantarel; Uri Y Levine; Darrell O Bayles; David P Alt; Bernard Henrissat; Thaddeus B Stanton
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Diversity and dynamics of bacteriocins from human microbiome.

Authors:  Jinshui Zheng; Michael G Gänzle; Xiaoxi B Lin; Lifang Ruan; Ming Sun
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.491

5.  Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy.

Authors:  John Penders; Carel Thijs; Cornelis Vink; Foekje F Stelma; Bianca Snijders; Ischa Kummeling; Piet A van den Brandt; Ellen E Stobberingh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes.

Authors:  Jens Walter; Ruth Ley
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 15.500

7.  Metabolism by bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria of polysaccharides from wheat and rye, and exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis.

Authors:  M Korakli; M G Gänzle; R F Vogel
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 8.  Diarrhoea in children: an interface between developing and developed countries.

Authors:  Nikhil Thapar; Ian R Sanderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Effect of Lactobacillus salivarius bacteriocin Abp118 on the mouse and pig intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Eliette Riboulet-Bisson; Mark H J Sturme; Ian B Jeffery; Michelle M O'Donnell; B Anne Neville; Brian M Forde; Marcus J Claesson; Hugh Harris; Gillian E Gardiner; Patrick G Casey; Peadar G Lawlor; Paul W O'Toole; R Paul Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME.

Authors:  José A Navas-Molina; Juan M Peralta-Sánchez; Antonio González; Paul J McMurdie; Yoshiki Vázquez-Baeza; Zhenjiang Xu; Luke K Ursell; Christian Lauber; Hongwei Zhou; Se Jin Song; James Huntley; Gail L Ackermann; Donna Berg-Lyons; Susan Holmes; J Gregory Caporaso; Rob Knight
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between host and gut microbiota in domestic pigs: a review.

Authors:  Yadnyavalkya Patil; Ravi Gooneratne; Xiang-Hong Ju
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2019-11-24

Review 2.  Impact of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis.

Authors:  Mark A Underwood
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri expressing a 3D8 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) enhances chicken growth and conserves immune homeostasis.

Authors:  Shanmugam Sureshkumar; Sun Keun Jung; Dongjun Kim; Keon Bong Oh; Hyeon Yang; Hwi Cheul Lee; Jo Yong Jin; Lee Hae Sun; Sukchan Lee; Sung June Byun
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Probiotics and Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in Premature Infants.

Authors:  Mark A Underwood
Journal:  For Immunopathol Dis Therap       Date:  2016

5.  Lactobacillus reuteri HCM2 protects mice against Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli through modulation of gut microbiota.

Authors:  Tianwei Wang; Kunling Teng; Gang Liu; Yayong Liu; Jie Zhang; Xin Zhang; Min Zhang; Yong Tao; Jin Zhong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Metagenomic reconstructions of gut microbial metabolism in weanling pigs.

Authors:  Weilan Wang; Huifeng Hu; Ruurd T Zijlstra; Jinshui Zheng; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 14.650

7.  (S)-Reutericyclin: Susceptibility Testing and In Vivo Effect on Murine Fecal Microbiome and Volatile Organic Compounds.

Authors:  Bernhard Kienesberger; Beate Obermüller; Georg Singer; Barbara Mittl; Reingard Grabherr; Sigrid Mayrhofer; Stefan Heinl; Vanessa Stadlbauer; Angela Horvath; Wolfram Miekisch; Patricia Fuchs; Ingeborg Klymiuk; Holger Till; Christoph Castellani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Small molecule natural products in human nasal/oral microbiota.

Authors:  Colin Charles Barber; Wenjun Zhang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 9.  Role of Lactobacillus reuteri in Human Health and Diseases.

Authors:  Qinghui Mu; Vincent J Tavella; Xin M Luo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Gut Symbionts Lactobacillus reuteri R2lc and 2010 Encode a Polyketide Synthase Cluster That Activates the Mammalian Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor.

Authors:  Mustafa Özçam; Restituto Tocmo; Jee-Hwan Oh; Amin Afrazi; Joshua D Mezrich; Stefan Roos; Jan Claesen; Jan-Peter van Pijkeren
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.