Literature DB >> 26283404

Reply to Lane and Martin: Being and becoming eukaryotes.

Austin Booth1, W Ford Doolittle2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26283404      PMCID： PMC4568237          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1513285112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  The energetics of genome complexity.

Authors:  Nick Lane; William Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Eukaryotes really are special, and mitochondria are why.

Authors:  Nick Lane; William F Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Eukaryogenesis, how special really?

Authors:  Austin Booth; W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0.

Authors:  Eörs Szathmáry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Earth's oxygen cycle and the evolution of animal life.

Authors:  Christopher T Reinhard; Noah J Planavsky; Stephanie L Olson; Timothy W Lyons; Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The economics of organellar gene loss and endosymbiotic gene transfer.

Authors:  Steven Kelly
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  Peptidoglycan Production by an Insect-Bacterial Mosaic.

Authors:  DeAnna C Bublitz; Grayson L Chadwick; John S Magyar; Kelsi M Sandoz; Diane M Brooks; Stéphane Mesnage; Mark S Ladinsky; Arkadiy I Garber; Pamela J Bjorkman; Victoria J Orphan; John P McCutcheon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 41.582
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.