Literature DB >> 26281038

Barriers and facilitators of mental health screening in pregnancy.

Dawn Kingston1, Marie-Paule Austin2, Maureen Heaman3, Sheila McDonald4, Gerri Lasiuk5, Wendy Sword6, Rebecca Giallo7, Kathy Hegadoren5, Lydia Vermeyden5, Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten5, Joshua Kingston8, Karly Jarema5, Anne Biringer9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Access to mental health services during pregnancy is most commonly mobilized through formal mental health screening. However, few studies to date have identified barriers and facilitators that affect pregnant women's responses to mental health screening. The objective was to identify barriers and facilitators that influence pregnant women's responses to the screening process and factors associated with their identification.
METHODS: This multi-site, cross-sectional survey recruited pregnant women >16 years of age who spoke/read English in Alberta, Canada. Main outcomes were barriers and facilitators of mental health screening. Descriptive statistics were generated to identify the most common barriers and facilitators and multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to determine factors associated with barriers and facilitators.
RESULTS: Study participation rate was 92% (460/500). Women's most common barriers were: significant others normalizing their emotional difficulties; desiring to handle mental health problems on their own; preferring to discuss feelings with significant others; and not knowing what emotions were 'normal'. Women who identified these barriers were more likely not to have been treated previously for mental illness, were primiparous, and could not be completely honest with their provider. Main facilitators were provider characteristics (sensitive, interested), reassurance that mental healthcare is a part of routine prenatal care, hearing that other women have emotional problems during pregnancy and knowing that help was available. LIMITATIONS: The sample comprised largely Caucasian, well-educated, and partnered women, which limits generalizability of the findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Personal and stigma-related barriers influence pregnant women's responses to mental health screening. Efforts to minimize barriers and enhance facilitators should be explored as potential strategies for optimizing prenatal mental health screening.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal anxiety; Antenatal depression; Mental health; Pregnancy; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26281038     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  22 in total

1.  Pregnancy and the Acceptability of Computer-Based Versus Traditional Mental Health Treatments.

Authors:  Liisa Hantsoo; Jessica Podcasy; Mary Sammel; Cynthia Neill Epperson; Deborah R Kim
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Access to Secondary Mental Health Services in a Cohort of New Zealand Mothers.

Authors:  Sara K Filoche; Bev Lawton; James Stanley
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2016-07-11

3.  Barriers to Seeking and Accepting Treatment for Perinatal Depression: A Qualitative Study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Márcia Leonardi Baldisserotto; Mariza Miranda Theme; Liliana Yanet Gomez; Talita Borges Queiroga Dos Reis
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2019-09-10

Review 4.  Parenting after a history of childhood maltreatment: A scoping review and map of evidence in the perinatal period.

Authors:  Catherine Chamberlain; Graham Gee; Stephen Harfield; Sandra Campbell; Sue Brennan; Yvonne Clark; Fiona Mensah; Kerry Arabena; Helen Herrman; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Feasibility and Acceptability of Internet-Based Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Stress, Anxiety, and Depression in Prenatal Women: Thematic Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine S Bright; Scott Stuart; Deborah A Mcneil; Lindsay Murray; Dawn E Kingston
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-10

6.  Study protocol of guided mobile-based perinatal mindfulness intervention (GMBPMI) - a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Siu-Man Ng; Ling Li Leng; Ka Po Chan; Hay-Ming Herman Lo; Albert Yeung; Shuang Lu; Amenda Wang; Hui Yun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Perinatal Anxiety and Depression in Minority Women.

Authors:  Susan Gennaro; Caitlin OʼConnor; Elizabeth Anne McKay; Anne Gibeau; Melanie Aviles; Jacqueline Hoying; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk
Journal:  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.412

8.  Pregnant Women's Perceptions of Harms and Benefits of Mental Health Screening.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Marie-Paule Austin; Sheila W McDonald; Lydia Vermeyden; Maureen Heaman; Kathleen Hegadoren; Gerri Lasiuk; Joshua Kingston; Wendy Sword; Karly Jarema; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sarah D McDonald; Anne Biringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for perinatal anxiety and depression versus treatment as usual: study protocol for two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Siobhan A Loughnan; Jill M Newby; Hila Haskelberg; Alison Mahoney; Natalie Kladnitski; Jessica Smith; Emma Black; Christopher Holt; Jeannette Milgrom; Marie-Paule Austin; Gavin Andrews
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  A Thematic Analysis of Stigma and Disclosure for Perinatal Depression on an Online Forum.

Authors:  Donna Moore; Susan Ayers; Nicholas Drey
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2016-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.