BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for resected pancreatic cancer is controversial because direct comparisons of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) alone and chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT) are limited. This study assessed outcomes of CT versus CRT in a national cohort to provide a modern estimate of comparative effectiveness. METHODS: Patients with pT1-3N0-1M0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma after pancreatectomy were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Overall survival (OS) was compared for CT and CRT groups with Cox regression and propensity score matching. Subset analyses by clinicopathologic characteristics were performed. RESULTS: This study identified 6165 patients treated with CT (n = 2334 or 38%) or CRT (n = 3831 or 62%). Most were classified as pT3 (72%), pN1 (67%), and status-post R0 resection (84%). For CRT patients, the median radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Compared with CT, CRT was associated with improved OS in a univariate analysis (median, 20.0 vs 22.3 months; at 5 years, 16.5% vs 19.6%; P < .001) and a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.893; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.837-0.953; P = .001). CRT remained associated with improved OS after propensity score matching (HR, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.793-0.913; P < .001). Subset analyses showed that CRT was associated with improved OS among patients with pT3 (HR, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.828-0.962; P = .003) or pN1 disease (HR, 0.856; 95% CI, 0.793-0.924; P < .001) and both R0 resection (HR, 0.901; 95% CI, 0.839-0.969; P = .005) and R1 resection (HR, 0.842; 95% CI, 0.722-0.983; P = .030). CONCLUSIONS: CRT was independently associated with improved OS after the resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a large national cohort and particularly among patients with R1 resection and pN1 disease. Well-designed randomized comparisons of CRT and CT are urgently needed.
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for resected pancreatic cancer is controversial because direct comparisons of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) alone and chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CRT) are limited. This study assessed outcomes of CT versus CRT in a national cohort to provide a modern estimate of comparative effectiveness. METHODS:Patients with pT1-3N0-1M0 pancreatic adenocarcinoma after pancreatectomy were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Overall survival (OS) was compared for CT and CRT groups with Cox regression and propensity score matching. Subset analyses by clinicopathologic characteristics were performed. RESULTS: This study identified 6165 patients treated with CT (n = 2334 or 38%) or CRT (n = 3831 or 62%). Most were classified as pT3 (72%), pN1 (67%), and status-post R0 resection (84%). For CRT patients, the median radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Compared with CT, CRT was associated with improved OS in a univariate analysis (median, 20.0 vs 22.3 months; at 5 years, 16.5% vs 19.6%; P < .001) and a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.893; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.837-0.953; P = .001). CRT remained associated with improved OS after propensity score matching (HR, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.793-0.913; P < .001). Subset analyses showed that CRT was associated with improved OS among patients with pT3 (HR, 0.892; 95% CI, 0.828-0.962; P = .003) or pN1 disease (HR, 0.856; 95% CI, 0.793-0.924; P < .001) and both R0 resection (HR, 0.901; 95% CI, 0.839-0.969; P = .005) and R1 resection (HR, 0.842; 95% CI, 0.722-0.983; P = .030). CONCLUSIONS: CRT was independently associated with improved OS after the resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a large national cohort and particularly among patients with R1 resection and pN1 disease. Well-designed randomized comparisons of CRT and CT are urgently needed.
Authors: Steve Walston; Joseph Salloum; Carmine Grieco; Evan Wuthrick; Dayssy A Diaz; Christian Barney; Andrei Manilchuk; Carl Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Timothy M Pawlik; Terence M Williams Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Courtney J Pokrzywa; Daniel E Abbott; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Emily R Winslow; Sharon M Weber; Alexander V Fisher Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Nikhil Yegya-Raman; Mihir M Shah; Miral S Grandhi; Elizabeth Poplin; David A August; Timothy J Kennedy; Usha Malhotra; Kristen R Spencer; Darren R Carpizo; Salma K Jabbour Journal: Ann Pancreat Cancer Date: 2018-08-06
Authors: Caitlin A McIntyre; Constantinos P Zambirinis; Alessandra Pulvirenti; Joanne F Chou; Mithat Gonen; Vinod P Balachandran; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D'Angelica; Murray F Brennan; Jeffrey A Drebin; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-05-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Aaron J Grossberg; Linda C Chu; Christopher R Deig; Eliot K Fishman; William L Hwang; Anirban Maitra; Daniel L Marks; Arnav Mehta; Nima Nabavizadeh; Diane M Simeone; Colin D Weekes; Charles R Thomas Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2020-07-19 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Asmita Chopra; Jacob C Hodges; Adam Olson; Steve Burton; Susannah G Ellsworth; Nathan Bahary; Aatur D Singhi; Brian A Boone; Joal D Beane; David Bartlett; Kenneth K Lee; Melissa E Hogg; Michael T Lotze; Alessandro Paniccia; Herbert Zeh; Amer H Zureikat Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Omeed Moaven; Clancy J Clark; Gregory B Russell; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Russell Howerton; Edward A Levine; Perry Shen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Hyun Ju Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Seung Min Bang; Si Young Song; Jinsil Seong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240