BACKGROUND: The recent overdiagnosis of subclinical, low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) coincides with a growing national interest in cost-effective health care practices. The aim of this study was to measure the relative cost-effectiveness of disease surveillance of low-risk PTC patients versus intermediate- and high-risk patients in accordance with American Thyroid Association risk categories. METHODS: Two thousand nine hundred thirty-two patients who underwent thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer between 2000 and 2010 were identified from the institutional database; 1845 patients were excluded because they had non-PTC cancer, underwent less than total thyroidectomy, had a secondary cancer, or had <36 months of follow-up. In total, 1087 were included for analysis. The numbers of postoperative blood tests, imaging scans and biopsies, clinician office visits, and recurrence events were recorded for the first 36 months of follow-up. Costs of surveillance were determined with the Physician Fee Schedule and Clinical Lab Fee Schedule of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. RESULTS: The median age was 44 years (range, 7-83 years). In the first 36 months after thyroidectomy, there were 3, 44, and 22 recurrences (0.8%, 7.8%, and 13.4%) in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively. The cost of surveillance for each recurrence detected was US $147,819, US $22,434, and US $20,680, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The cost to detect a recurrence in a low-risk patient is more than 6 and 7 times greater than the cost for intermediate- and high-risk PTC patients. It is difficult to justify this allocation of resources to the surveillance of low-risk patients. Surveillance strategies for the low-risk group should, therefore, be restructured.
BACKGROUND: The recent overdiagnosis of subclinical, low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) coincides with a growing national interest in cost-effective health care practices. The aim of this study was to measure the relative cost-effectiveness of disease surveillance of low-risk PTCpatients versus intermediate- and high-risk patients in accordance with American Thyroid Association risk categories. METHODS: Two thousand nine hundred thirty-two patients who underwent thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer between 2000 and 2010 were identified from the institutional database; 1845 patients were excluded because they had non-PTCcancer, underwent less than total thyroidectomy, had a secondary cancer, or had <36 months of follow-up. In total, 1087 were included for analysis. The numbers of postoperative blood tests, imaging scans and biopsies, clinician office visits, and recurrence events were recorded for the first 36 months of follow-up. Costs of surveillance were determined with the Physician Fee Schedule and Clinical Lab Fee Schedule of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. RESULTS: The median age was 44 years (range, 7-83 years). In the first 36 months after thyroidectomy, there were 3, 44, and 22 recurrences (0.8%, 7.8%, and 13.4%) in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively. The cost of surveillance for each recurrence detected was US $147,819, US $22,434, and US $20,680, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The cost to detect a recurrence in a low-risk patient is more than 6 and 7 times greater than the cost for intermediate- and high-risk PTCpatients. It is difficult to justify this allocation of resources to the surveillance of low-risk patients. Surveillance strategies for the low-risk group should, therefore, be restructured.
Authors: R Michael Tuttle; Hernan Tala; Jatin Shah; Rebecca Leboeuf; Ronald Ghossein; Mithat Gonen; Matvey Brokhin; Gal Omry; James A Fagin; Ashok Shaha Journal: Thyroid Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Bryan R Hauger; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Furio Pacini; Martin Schlumberger; Steven I Sherman; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Laura Y Wang; Frank L Palmer; Dorothy Thomas; Ashok R Shaha; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; R Michael Tuttle; Ian Ganly Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Peter A Ubel; Scott R Berry; Eric Nadler; Chaim M Bell; Michael A Kozminski; Jennifer A Palmer; William K Evans; Elizabeth L Strevel; Peter J Neumann Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jon C Tilburt; Matthew K Wynia; Robert D Sheeler; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Katherine M James; Jason S Egginton; Mark Liebow; Samia Hurst; Marion Danis; Susan Dorr Goold Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Luca Giovanella; Anca M Avram; Jerome Clerc; Elif Hindié; David Taïeb; Frederik A Verburg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 9.236