| Literature DB >> 26279973 |
Jamie Q Felicitas1, Hilary C Tanenbaum1, Yawen Li2, Chih-Ping Chou3, Paula H Palmer1, Donna Spruijt-Metz3, Kim D Reynolds1, C Anderson Johnson1, Bin Xie1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This paper explores the longitudinal effects of socioeconomic factors (i.e., parent education and family income level), foreign media, and attitude toward appearance on general and central adiposity among Chinese adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent; attitude; communications media; longitudinal studies; obesity; social class
Year: 2015 PMID: 26279973 PMCID: PMC4535427 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.07.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med Rep ISSN: 2211-3355
General characteristics of Chinese Seven Cities Study participants (n = 5020) by grade within gender (China, 2002-2005).
| Girls ( | Boys ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school | High school | Middle school | High school | |
| Age at baseline (mean ± SD) | 12.6 ± 0.6 | 15.7 ± 0.6 | 12.8 ± 0.7 | 15.9 ± 0.6 |
| City residence (N (%)) | ||||
| Chengdu | 178 (14.5) | 262 (18.8) | 169 (14.6) | 211 (17.0) |
| Hangzhou | 154 (12.6) | 194 (13.9) | 146 (12.6) | 176 (14.2) |
| Shenyang | 194 (15.8) | 182 (13.1) | 196 (16.9) | 159 (12.8) |
| Wuhan | 214 (17.4) | 231 (16.6) | 194 (16.7) | 190 (15.4) |
| Harbin | 156 (12.7) | 165 (11.8) | 143 (12.3) | 162 (13.1) |
| Kunming | 159 (13.0) | 132 (9.5) | 144 (12.4) | 143 (11.6) |
| Qingdao | 172 (14.0) | 229 (16.4) | 168 (14.5) | 197 (15.9) |
| Media exposure (mean ± SD) | ||||
| Asian media from Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | 1.7 ± 1.0 | 1.9 ± 1.0 |
| United States media | 0.5 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.9 ± 0.8 |
| All foreign media | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.8 |
| Attitude toward appearance (mean ± SD) | 9.7 ± 2.3 | 10.7 ± 2.0 | 9.4 ± 2.5 | 10.6 ± 2.1 |
| Parent education (%) | ||||
| Below high school | 28.3 | 23.4 | 28.6 | 24.3 |
| High school | 35.0 | 47.5 | 36.9 | 46.6 |
| College or above | 36.7 | 29.1 | 34.5 | 29.2 |
| Family income (%) | ||||
| Wave 1 | ||||
| < 500 yuan/mon | 14.0 | 13.0 | 14.6 | 12.1 |
| 501–2000 yuan/mon | 60.0 | 61.7 | 62.5 | 63.0 |
| > 2000 yuan/mon | 25.9 | 25.4 | 23.0 | 24.9 |
| Wave 2 | ||||
| < 500 yuan/mon | 11.5 | 10.1 | 11.1 | 9.7 |
| 501–2000 yuan/mon | 54.6 | 58.2 | 58.5 | 58.7 |
| > 2000 yuan/mon | 33.9 | 31.7 | 30.4 | 31.6 |
| Wave 3 | ||||
| < 500 yuan/mon | 9.8 | 7.0 | 9.7 | 8.4 |
| 501–2000 yuan/mon | 54.1 | 56.1 | 56.5 | 54.6 |
| > 2000 yuan/mon | 36.1 | 36.9 | 33.8 | 37.0 |
Note. Chi-square tests and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate differences between grade levels within gender for categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively.
Asterisks indicate overall significant differences.
p < 0.05.
p < 0.001.
Body Mass Index (BMI), waist circumference, and overweight status of Chinese Seven Cities Study participants (n = 5020) at each wave by grade within gender (China, 2002 − 2005).
| Girls ( | Boys ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Middle school | High school | p-value | Middle school | High school | p-value | |
| BMI (mean kg/m2 ± SD) | ||||||
| Wave 1 | 19.3 ± 3.3 | 21.0 ± 3.1 | < 0.001 | 20.0 ± 3.8 | 21.5 ± 3.9 | < 0.001 |
| Wave 2 | 19.9 ± 3.3 | 20.9 ± 2.9 | < 0.001 | 20.5 ± 4.0 | 21.7 ± 3.8 | < 0.001 |
| Wave 3 | 20.3 ± 3.1 | 20.9 ± 3.0 | < 0.001 | 20.8 ± 4.0 | 21.9 ± 3.7 | < 0.001 |
| Waist circumference (mean cm ± SD) | ||||||
| Wave 1 | 71.3 ± 9.6 | 75.9 ± 9.5 | < 0.001 | 73.2 ± 10.8 | 78.4 ± 10.6 | < 0.001 |
| Wave 2 | 66.0 ± 8.0 | 67.6 ± 6.6 | < 0.001 | 71.0 ± 10.5 | 74.5 ± 9.5 | < 0.001 |
| Wave 3 | 67.2 ± 7.1 | 68.5 ± 6.9 | < 0.001 | 72.5 ± 10.3 | 75.9 ± 9.4 | < 0.001 |
| Overweight (N (%)) | ||||||
| Wave 1 | 183 (14.9) | 172 (12.3) | 0.05 | 296 (25.5) | 262 (21.2) | 0.01 |
| Wave 2 | 156 (12.7) | 125 (9.0) | < 0.05 | 274 (23.6) | 241 (19.7) | 0.02 |
| Wave 3 | 155 (12.6) | 115 (9.0) | < 0.05 | 263 (22.7) | 195 (18.0) | < 0.05 |
Chi-square tests and independent t-tests were conducted to evaluate differences between grade levels within gender for categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively.
Results of longitudinal analyses among girls participating in the Chinese Seven Cities Study (n = 2622) by grade (China, 2002–2005).
| Middle school ( | High school ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE | p-value | Beta | SE | p-value | |
| BMI | ||||||
| Time | 0.94 | 0.14 | < 0.01 | − 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Time*time | − 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.36 |
| Foreign media exposure | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.36 | − 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.83 |
| Time*Foreign media exposure | − 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | − 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Attitude toward appearance | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.31 | − 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| Time*attitude toward appearance | − 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.96 |
| Parent education | − 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.71 |
| Time*Parent education | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.50 | − 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.55 |
| Family income | − 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.49 |
| Time*Family income | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.36 |
| Waist circumference | ||||||
| Time | − 5.99 | 0.63 | < 0.01 | − 11.13 | 0.79 | < 0.01 |
| Time*time | 3.26 | 0.18 | < 0.01 | 4.72 | 0.19 | < 0.01 |
| Foreign media exposure | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.99 |
| Time*Foreign media exposure | − 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.68 |
| Attitude toward appearance | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.26 | − 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.27 |
| Time*Attitude toward appearance | − 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.11 | − 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.33 |
| Parent education | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.32 | 0.43 |
| Time*Parent education | − 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.08 | − 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.81 |
| Family income | 1.44 | 0.32 | < 0.01 | 1.42 | 0.32 | < 0.01 |
| Time*Family income | − 1.33 | 0.20 | < 0.01 | − 1.29 | 0.22 | < 0.01 |
| OR | 95% CL | p-value | OR | 95% CL | p-value | |
| Overweight status | ||||||
| Time | 0.80 | (0.52,1.21) | 0.29 | 0.71 | (0.42,1.22) | 0.21 |
| Time*time | 1.08 | (0.97,1.21) | 0.18 | 1.14 | (0.99,1.31) | 0.06 |
| Foreign media exposure | 1.05 | (0.86,1.27) | 0.64 | 1.02 | (0.83,1.26) | 0.87 |
| Time*Foreign media exposure | 0.99 | (0.93,1.06) | 0.83 | 0.97 | (0.88,1.07) | 0.52 |
| Attitude toward appearance | 0.97 | (0.90,1.05) | 0.46 | 0.86 | (0.79,0.94) | < 0.01 |
| Time*Attitude toward appearance | 1.00 | (0.97,1.03) | 0.92 | 1.00 | (0.96,1.05) | 0.84 |
| Parent education | 1.15 | (0.92,1.45) | 0.22 | 0.99 | (0.75,1.30) | 0.93 |
| Time*Parent education | 0.96 | (0.87,1.05) | 0.38 | 1.07 | (0.92,1.24) | 0.37 |
| Family income | 0.96 | (0.77,1.20) | 0.73 | 1.24 | (0.96,1.59) | 0.10 |
| Time*Family income | 1.03 | (0.90,1.17) | 0.70 | 0.86 | (0.72,1.02) | 0.08 |
Results of longitudinal analyses among boys participating in the Chinese Seven Cities Study (n = 2398) by grade (China, 2002–2005).
| Middle school ( | High school ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | SE | p-value | Beta | SE | p-value | |
| BMI | ||||||
| Time | 0.72 | 0.16 | < 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.69 |
| Time*time | − 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.30 |
| Foreign media exposure | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.02 | − 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Time*Foreign media exposure | − 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.23 | − 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.24 |
| Attitude toward appearance | − 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.53 | − 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.51 |
| Time*attitude toward appearance | − 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.57 |
| Parent education | 0.62 | 0.15 | < 0.01 | 0.37 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
| Time*Parent education | − 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.27 | − 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.26 |
| Family income | 0.01 | 0.09 | 0.89 | − 0.02 | 0.09 | 0.85 |
| Time*Family income | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.17 |
| Waist circumference | ||||||
| Time | − 3.78 | 0.59 | < 0.01 | − 5.08 | 0.75 | < 0.01 |
| Time*time | 1.97 | 0.18 | < 0.01 | 2.79 | 0.20 | < 0.01 |
| Foreign media exposure | 0.74 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.34 | 0.95 |
| Time*Foreign media exposure | 0.00 | 0.11 | 0.97 | − 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.63 |
| Attitude toward appearance | − 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.97 |
| Time*Attitude toward appearance | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.47 | − 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.22 |
| Parent education | 1.51 | 0.41 | < 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| Time*Parent education | − 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.04 |
| Family income | 1.00 | 0.31 | < 0.01 | 1.31 | 0.34 | < 0.01 |
| Time*Family income | − 0.58 | 0.20 | < 0.01 | − 1.07 | 0.22 | < 0.01 |
| OR | 95% CL | p-value | OR | 95% CL | p-value | |
| Overweight status | ||||||
| Time | 0.89 | (0.67,1.18) | 0.43 | 1.25 | (0.87,1.79) | 0.23 |
| Time*time | 1.03 | (0.96,1.12) | 0.42 | 0.97 | (0.88,1.06) | 0.46 |
| Foreign media exposure | 1.15 | (0.98,1.34) | 0.10 | 1.01 | (0.84,1.21) | 0.93 |
| Time*Foreign media exposure | 1.01 | (0.95,1.07) | 0.69 | 0.95 | (0.87,1.03) | 0.18 |
| Attitude toward appearance | 0.98 | (0.92,1.03) | 0.39 | 0.98 | (0.92,1.05) | 0.61 |
| Time*Attitude toward appearance | 1.00 | (0.98,1.02) | 0.79 | 0.99 | (0.96,1.02) | 0.66 |
| Parent education | 1.55 | (1.28,1.88) | < 0.01 | 1.26 | (1.02,1.57) | 0.04 |
| Time*Parent education | 0.98 | (0.90,1.07) | 0.60 | 0.97 | (0.88,1.08) | 0.63 |
| Family income | 1.16 | (1.00,1.35) | 0.05 | 1.04 | (0.87,1.25) | 0.66 |
| Time*Family income | 0.97 | (0.88,1.08) | 0.61 | 0.99 | (0.87,1.12) | 0.85 |