Literature DB >> 26279927

Crystal structure of 3-(hy-droxy-meth-yl)chromone.

Yoshinobu Ishikawa1.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C10H8O3 (systematic name 3-hy-droxy-methyl-4H-chromen-4-one), the fused-ring system is slightly puckered [dihedral angle between the rings = 3.84 (11)°]. The hy-droxy O atom deviates from the heterocyclic ring by 1.422 (1) Å. In the crystal, inversion dimers linked by pairs of O-H⋯O hydrogen bonds generate R 2 (2)(12) loops. The dimers are linked by aromatic π-π stacking [shortest centroid-centroid distance = 3.580 (3) Å], and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, generating a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromone; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; π–π stacking

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279927      PMCID: PMC4518918          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015011627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For the biological activities of related compounds, see: Sun et al. (2009 ▸); Helguera et al. (2013 ▸); Venkateswararao et al. (2014 ▸). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Araya-Maturana et al. (2003 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

C10H8O3 M = 176.17 Triclinic, a = 6.756 (4) Å b = 7.988 (6) Å c = 7.991 (6) Å α = 94.48 (6)° β = 108.27 (5)° γ = 103.31 (5)° V = 393.2 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.11 mm−1 T = 100 K 0.32 × 0.32 × 0.16 mm

Data collection

Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometer 2219 measured reflections 1805 independent reflections 1537 reflections with F 2 > 2.0σ(F 2) R int = 0.089 3 standard reflections every 150 reflections intensity decay: 0.1%

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.065 wR(F 2) = 0.202 S = 1.06 1805 reflections 119 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.49 e Å−3

Data collection: WinAFC Diffractometer Control Software (Rigaku, 1999 ▸); cell refinement: WinAFC Diffractometer Control Software; data reduction: WinAFC Diffractometer Control Software; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2008 (Burla et al., 2007 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸); molecular graphics: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2010 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: CrystalStructure. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) General, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015011627/hb7444sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015011627/hb7444Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015011627/hb7444Isup3.cml Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015011627/hb7444fig1.tif The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015011627/hb7444fig2.tif A view of the packing of the title compound. O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are represented as dashed lines. CCDC reference: 1406927 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H8O3Z = 2
Mr = 176.17F(000) = 184.00
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.488 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71069 Å
a = 6.756 (4) ÅCell parameters from 25 reflections
b = 7.988 (6) Åθ = 15.5–17.3°
c = 7.991 (6) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
α = 94.48 (6)°T = 100 K
β = 108.27 (5)°Block, colorless
γ = 103.31 (5)°0.32 × 0.32 × 0.16 mm
V = 393.2 (5) Å3
Rigaku AFC-7R diffractometerθmax = 27.5°
ω–2θ scansh = −4→8
2219 measured reflectionsk = −10→10
1805 independent reflectionsl = −10→9
1537 reflections with F2 > 2.0σ(F2)3 standard reflections every 150 reflections
Rint = 0.089 intensity decay: 0.1%
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.065Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.202H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1399P)2 + 0.1723P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1805 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
119 parametersΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.49 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Refinement. Refinement was performed using all reflections. The weighted R-factor (wR) and goodness of fit (S) are based on F2. R-factor (gt) are based on F. The threshold expression of F2 > 2.0 σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factor (gt).
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.72779 (19)1.01991 (17)0.70911 (18)0.0179 (4)
O21.19522 (19)0.80874 (17)0.63213 (18)0.0190 (4)
O30.7925 (2)0.48525 (17)0.56522 (17)0.0195 (4)
C10.6785 (3)0.8666 (3)0.6006 (3)0.0167 (4)
C20.8224 (3)0.7871 (3)0.5707 (3)0.0146 (4)
C31.0527 (3)0.8696 (3)0.6575 (3)0.0133 (4)
C41.3221 (3)1.1214 (3)0.8824 (3)0.0168 (4)
C51.3681 (3)1.2688 (3)1.0053 (3)0.0209 (5)
C61.1985 (3)1.3325 (3)1.0269 (3)0.0218 (5)
C70.9868 (3)1.2504 (3)0.9255 (3)0.0200 (5)
C81.1070 (3)1.0325 (3)0.7810 (3)0.0147 (4)
C90.9416 (3)1.0995 (3)0.8033 (3)0.0153 (4)
C100.7477 (3)0.6132 (3)0.4539 (3)0.0165 (4)
H10.52940.81010.54030.0201*
H21.43691.07980.86650.0202*
H31.51391.32721.07510.0251*
H41.23061.43331.11230.0262*
H50.87291.29550.93820.0240*
H6A0.59050.58550.38700.0198*
H7B0.82470.61450.36690.0198*
H80.82000.40520.50930.0234*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0130 (6)0.0202 (7)0.0240 (7)0.0070 (5)0.0090 (5)0.0043 (5)
O20.0112 (6)0.0225 (7)0.0252 (7)0.0067 (5)0.0075 (5)0.0032 (6)
O30.0195 (7)0.0188 (7)0.0236 (7)0.0069 (5)0.0104 (6)0.0052 (5)
C10.0110 (8)0.0212 (9)0.0193 (9)0.0041 (7)0.0061 (7)0.0073 (7)
C20.0108 (8)0.0202 (9)0.0144 (8)0.0046 (7)0.0050 (6)0.0067 (7)
C30.0115 (8)0.0168 (9)0.0129 (8)0.0043 (6)0.0052 (6)0.0053 (6)
C40.0158 (8)0.0179 (9)0.0168 (8)0.0054 (7)0.0044 (7)0.0050 (7)
C50.0205 (9)0.0212 (10)0.0174 (9)0.0040 (7)0.0021 (7)0.0055 (7)
C60.0302 (10)0.0184 (9)0.0171 (9)0.0071 (8)0.0077 (8)0.0042 (7)
C70.0264 (9)0.0198 (9)0.0212 (9)0.0113 (8)0.0136 (8)0.0068 (7)
C80.0144 (8)0.0179 (9)0.0140 (8)0.0055 (7)0.0061 (7)0.0071 (7)
C90.0149 (8)0.0191 (9)0.0144 (8)0.0055 (7)0.0068 (7)0.0069 (7)
C100.0101 (8)0.0204 (9)0.0178 (9)0.0026 (7)0.0039 (6)0.0038 (7)
O1—C11.352 (3)C6—C71.375 (3)
O1—C91.371 (2)C7—C91.400 (3)
O2—C31.236 (3)C8—C91.396 (3)
O3—C101.429 (3)O3—H80.840
C1—C21.346 (3)C1—H10.950
C2—C31.455 (3)C4—H20.950
C2—C101.495 (3)C5—H30.950
C3—C81.468 (3)C6—H40.950
C4—C51.381 (3)C7—H50.950
C4—C81.404 (3)C10—H6A0.990
C5—C61.407 (4)C10—H7B0.990
C1—O1—C9117.98 (17)O3—C10—C2108.17 (15)
O1—C1—C2125.63 (15)C10—O3—H8109.472
C1—C2—C3119.38 (17)O1—C1—H1117.186
C1—C2—C10120.66 (15)C2—C1—H1117.188
C3—C2—C10119.93 (18)C5—C4—H2119.761
O2—C3—C2123.48 (17)C8—C4—H2119.765
O2—C3—C8121.37 (15)C4—C5—H3120.061
C2—C3—C8115.15 (18)C6—C5—H3120.064
C5—C4—C8120.5 (2)C5—C6—H4119.658
C4—C5—C6119.88 (16)C7—C6—H4119.653
C5—C6—C7120.69 (19)C6—C7—H5120.506
C6—C7—C9119.0 (3)C9—C7—H5120.503
C3—C8—C4121.64 (19)O3—C10—H6A110.064
C3—C8—C9119.77 (15)O3—C10—H7B110.063
C4—C8—C9118.56 (17)C2—C10—H6A110.069
O1—C9—C7116.70 (19)C2—C10—H7B110.064
O1—C9—C8121.91 (17)H6A—C10—H7B108.407
C7—C9—C8121.38 (16)
C1—O1—C9—C7−174.88 (15)C5—C4—C8—C3−176.20 (17)
C1—O1—C9—C84.2 (3)C5—C4—C8—C91.9 (3)
C9—O1—C1—C2−2.8 (3)C8—C4—C5—C6−1.2 (3)
C9—O1—C1—H1177.2C8—C4—C5—H3178.8
H8—O3—C10—C2−148.1H2—C4—C5—C6178.8
H8—O3—C10—H6A91.6H2—C4—C5—H3−1.2
H8—O3—C10—H7B−27.8H2—C4—C8—C33.8
O1—C1—C2—C3−1.0 (3)H2—C4—C8—C9−178.1
O1—C1—C2—C10177.18 (16)C4—C5—C6—C7−0.7 (3)
H1—C1—C2—C3179.0C4—C5—C6—H4179.3
H1—C1—C2—C10−2.8H3—C5—C6—C7179.3
C1—C2—C3—O2−177.19 (17)H3—C5—C6—H4−0.7
C1—C2—C3—C83.3 (3)C5—C6—C7—C91.6 (3)
C1—C2—C10—O3−107.56 (19)C5—C6—C7—H5−178.4
C1—C2—C10—H6A12.7H4—C6—C7—C9−178.4
C1—C2—C10—H7B132.2H4—C6—C7—H51.6
C3—C2—C10—O370.6 (2)C6—C7—C9—O1178.25 (17)
C3—C2—C10—H6A−169.1C6—C7—C9—C8−0.8 (3)
C3—C2—C10—H7B−49.7H5—C7—C9—O1−1.8
C10—C2—C3—O24.6 (3)H5—C7—C9—C8179.2
C10—C2—C3—C8−174.93 (15)C3—C8—C9—O1−1.8 (3)
O2—C3—C8—C4−3.4 (3)C3—C8—C9—C7177.23 (16)
O2—C3—C8—C9178.52 (16)C4—C8—C9—O1−179.96 (16)
C2—C3—C8—C4176.19 (15)C4—C8—C9—C7−0.9 (3)
C2—C3—C8—C9−1.9 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H8···O2i0.841.942.757 (3)165
C1—H1···O2ii0.952.583.283 (4)131
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
O3H8O2i 0.841.942.757(3)165
C1H1O2ii 0.952.583.283(4)131

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Synthesis and SAR studies of bis-chromenone derivatives for anti-proliferative activity against human cancer cells.

Authors:  Eeda Venkateswararao; Vinay K Sharma; Manoj Manickam; Jieun Yun; Sang-Hun Jung
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Combining QSAR classification models for predictive modeling of human monoamine oxidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Aliuska Morales Helguera; Alfonso Pérez-Garrido; Alexandra Gaspar; Joana Reis; Fernando Cagide; Dolores Vina; M Natália D S Cordeiro; Fernanda Borges
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Identification of a chromone-based retinoid containing a polyolefinic side chain via facile synthetic routes.

Authors:  Weilin Sun; Patrick J Carroll; Dianne R Soprano; Daniel J Canney
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.