Literature DB >> 26279907

Crystal structure of (E)-1,2-bis-(4-bromo-2,6-di-fluoro-phen-yl)diazene.

Johannes Broichhagen1, David H Woodmansee1, Dirk Trauner1, Peter Mayer1.   

Abstract

In the crystal, mol-ecules of the centrosymmetric title compound, C12H4Br2F4N2, are linked into strands along [011] by weak C-H⋯F contacts. Furthermore, the mol-ecules are π-π stacked with perpendicular ring distances of 3.4530 (9) Å.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crystal structure

Year:  2015        PMID: 26279907      PMCID: PMC4518941          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For background on azo­benzenes, see: Mitscherlich (1834 ▸); Fehrentz et al. (2011 ▸); Banghart et al. (2004 ▸); Levitz et al. (2013 ▸); Broichhagen et al. (2014 ▸); Velema et al. (2013 ▸); Bléger et al. (2012 ▸). For the synthesis, see: Bléger et al. (2012 ▸). For related structures, see: Wragg et al. (2011 ▸); Gabe et al. (1981 ▸); Crispini et al. (1998 ▸); Elder & Vargas-Baca (2012 ▸); Komeyama et al. (1973 ▸); Ferguson et al. (1998 ▸); Reichenbächer et al. (2007 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

C12H4Br2F4N2 M = 411.98 Monoclinic, a = 10.3274 (5) Å b = 4.5667 (2) Å c = 13.1039 (6) Å β = 90.340 (3)° V = 618.00 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 6.60 mm−1 T = 173 K 0.14 × 0.07 × 0.02 mm

Data collection

Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2012 ▸) T min = 0.572, T max = 0.746 9803 measured reflections 1523 independent reflections 1218 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.051

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027 wR(F 2) = 0.055 S = 1.02 1523 reflections 91 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3

Data collection: Bruker Instrument Service (Bruker, 2007 ▸); cell refinement: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▸); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▸); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999 ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸); molecular graphics: ORTEP-III (Burnett & Johnson, 1996 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622/nr2060sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622/nr2060Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622/nr2060Isup3.cml Click here for additional data file. x y z . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622/nr2060fig1.tif The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, with atom labels and anisotropic displacement ellipsoids (drawn at 30% probability level) for non-H atoms. Symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, 2 − y, 1 − z. Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622/nr2060fig2.tif Weak C—H⋯F contacts (dotted lines) linking the title compound into strands along [011]. Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015010622/nr2060fig3.tif The unit cell of the title compound (displacement ellipsoids drawn at 30% probability level). CCDC reference: 1404445 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C12H4Br2F4N2F(000) = 392
Mr = 411.98Dx = 2.214 (1) Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 95 reflections
a = 10.3274 (5) Åθ = 5.4–24.6°
b = 4.5667 (2) ŵ = 6.60 mm1
c = 13.1039 (6) ÅT = 173 K
β = 90.340 (3)°Platelet, orange
V = 618.00 (5) Å30.14 × 0.07 × 0.02 mm
Z = 2
Bruker D8 Quest diffractometer1523 independent reflections
Radiation source: Microfocus source, Bruker IµS1218 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Focusing mirrors monochromatorRint = 0.051
Detector resolution: 10.4167 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.4°, θmin = 3.1°
mix of phi and ω scansh = −13→13
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2012)k = −6→6
Tmin = 0.572, Tmax = 0.746l = −17→17
9803 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.055H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0231P)2 + 0.2317P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1523 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
91 parametersΔρmax = 0.36 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.30 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on all data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3771 (2)0.7379 (5)0.52174 (17)0.0188 (5)
C20.2748 (2)0.6243 (6)0.46388 (18)0.0232 (5)
C30.1860 (2)0.4296 (6)0.49948 (18)0.0233 (5)
H30.11790.35940.45700.028*
C40.1983 (2)0.3376 (5)0.59963 (18)0.0197 (5)
C50.2992 (2)0.4325 (5)0.66162 (18)0.0216 (5)
H50.30840.36290.72960.026*
C60.3856 (2)0.6304 (5)0.62162 (18)0.0205 (5)
N10.45691 (19)0.9452 (5)0.47266 (15)0.0234 (4)
F10.26329 (15)0.7158 (4)0.36666 (10)0.0382 (4)
F20.48197 (15)0.7201 (4)0.68235 (11)0.0373 (4)
Br10.07408 (2)0.08357 (6)0.656884 (19)0.02666 (10)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0172 (11)0.0184 (13)0.0208 (12)−0.0001 (10)0.0014 (9)−0.0017 (10)
C20.0266 (13)0.0257 (14)0.0173 (12)−0.0002 (10)−0.0020 (9)0.0017 (10)
C30.0206 (12)0.0262 (14)0.0230 (12)−0.0035 (11)−0.0047 (9)−0.0029 (12)
C40.0173 (12)0.0150 (12)0.0270 (13)0.0020 (9)0.0046 (9)−0.0014 (10)
C50.0239 (12)0.0215 (13)0.0193 (11)0.0016 (11)−0.0011 (9)0.0003 (11)
C60.0203 (12)0.0199 (13)0.0214 (12)0.0000 (10)−0.0052 (9)−0.0049 (10)
N10.0221 (11)0.0239 (11)0.0243 (11)−0.0046 (9)−0.0016 (8)0.0014 (10)
F10.0385 (9)0.0555 (11)0.0205 (8)−0.0178 (8)−0.0093 (6)0.0125 (8)
F20.0372 (9)0.0479 (10)0.0268 (8)−0.0201 (8)−0.0142 (7)0.0079 (8)
Br10.02328 (14)0.02389 (15)0.03287 (15)−0.00452 (11)0.00594 (9)0.00056 (13)
C1—C21.397 (3)C4—C51.387 (3)
C1—C61.400 (3)C4—Br11.888 (2)
C1—N11.412 (3)C5—C61.376 (3)
C2—F11.345 (3)C5—H50.9500
C2—C31.362 (3)C6—F21.335 (3)
C3—C41.383 (3)N1—N1i1.244 (4)
C3—H30.9500
C2—C1—C6114.8 (2)C3—C4—Br1120.30 (18)
C2—C1—N1116.3 (2)C5—C4—Br1117.97 (18)
C6—C1—N1128.9 (2)C6—C5—C4117.9 (2)
F1—C2—C3118.1 (2)C6—C5—H5121.0
F1—C2—C1117.5 (2)C4—C5—H5121.0
C3—C2—C1124.4 (2)F2—C6—C5117.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4117.7 (2)F2—C6—C1119.4 (2)
C2—C3—H3121.2C5—C6—C1123.3 (2)
C4—C3—H3121.2N1i—N1—C1115.1 (2)
C3—C4—C5121.7 (2)
C6—C1—C2—F1−178.8 (2)Br1—C4—C5—C6−176.42 (17)
N1—C1—C2—F11.6 (3)C4—C5—C6—F2179.8 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C31.7 (4)C4—C5—C6—C1−0.5 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C3−177.9 (2)C2—C1—C6—F2178.4 (2)
F1—C2—C3—C4−179.7 (2)N1—C1—C6—F2−2.1 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.2 (4)C2—C1—C6—C5−1.2 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5−1.7 (4)N1—C1—C6—C5178.3 (2)
C2—C3—C4—Br1176.76 (18)C2—C1—N1—N1i176.3 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C62.1 (4)C6—C1—N1—N1i−3.2 (4)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5···F2ii0.952.533.190 (3)126
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C5H5F2i 0.952.533.190(3)126

Symmetry code: (i) .

  10 in total

Review 1.  Optochemical genetics.

Authors:  Timm Fehrentz; Matthias Schönberger; Dirk Trauner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Light-activated ion channels for remote control of neuronal firing.

Authors:  Matthew Banghart; Katharine Borges; Ehud Isacoff; Dirk Trauner; Richard H Kramer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-21       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Optical control of antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Willem A Velema; Jan Pieter van der Berg; Mickel J Hansen; Wiktor Szymanski; Arnold J M Driessen; Ben L Feringa
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 24.427

4.  o-Fluoroazobenzenes as readily synthesized photoswitches offering nearly quantitative two-way isomerization with visible light.

Authors:  David Bléger; Jutta Schwarz; Albert M Brouwer; Stefan Hecht
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Optical control of acetylcholinesterase with a tacrine switch.

Authors:  Johannes Broichhagen; Innokentij Jurastow; Katharina Iwan; Wolfgang Kummer; Dirk Trauner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  (E)-1-(2-Iodo-phen-yl)-2-phenyl-diazene.

Authors:  David S Wragg; Mohammed A K Ahmed; Ola Nilsen; Helmer Fjellvåg
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-08-11

7.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

8.  2,2'-Diiodo-azobenzene.

Authors:  Philip J W Elder; Ignacio Vargas-Baca
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-10-13

9.  Optical control of metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Joshua Levitz; Carlos Pantoja; Benjamin Gaub; Harald Janovjak; Andreas Reiner; Adam Hoagland; David Schoppik; Brian Kane; Philipp Stawski; Alexander F Schier; Dirk Trauner; Ehud Y Isacoff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.