S Mosleh1, M Alja'afreh2, A J Lee3. 1. Department of Adult Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mutah University, P.O. Box (7), Karak 61710, Jordan. Electronic address: s.mosleh@mutah.edu.jon. 2. Department of Adult Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mutah University, P.O. Box (7), Karak 61710, Jordan. Electronic address: mahd1967@mutah.edu.jo. 3. Medical Statistics Team, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, United Kingdom. Electronic address: a.j.lee@abdn.ac.uk.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the validity of family members/friends as proxies by comparing perceptions of satisfaction with care and decision making between critically ill patients and their family/friends. DESIGN: A comparative, descriptive cross-sectional study. SETTING: Seven Critical Care Units across four public and military hospitals in the centre and southern regions of Jordan. METHODS: A modified version of the Family Satisfaction-ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire was distributed to Critical Care Unit (CCU) patients before hospital discharge. In addition, up to two family members/close friends were also asked to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients (response rate 72%) and 246 family members/friends (response rate 79%) completed and returned the questionnaire. Although the majority of family members/friends and patients were satisfied with overall care, patients were generally significantly less satisfied (mean (SD) care subscale 75.6 (17.8) and 70.9 (17.3), respectively, (p=0.005). When individual items were examined, significant differences in nursing care (family/friends 80.1 (20.7) versus patient 75.9 (22.2), p=0.038) and inclusion in decision making (family/friends 53.9 (33.2) versus patient 62.0 (34.2), p=0.010) were found. CONCLUSION: The study showed a degree of congruence between patients and their family members/friends in relation to their satisfaction with the CCU experience. Thus, views of family/friends may serve as a proxy in assessing care and decision making processes of critically ill patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Appropriate training of the critical care team and provision of strategies to address the concerns of patients' families are needed to improve overall patient satisfaction.
AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the validity of family members/friends as proxies by comparing perceptions of satisfaction with care and decision making between critically ill patients and their family/friends. DESIGN: A comparative, descriptive cross-sectional study. SETTING: Seven Critical Care Units across four public and military hospitals in the centre and southern regions of Jordan. METHODS: A modified version of the Family Satisfaction-ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire was distributed to Critical Care Unit (CCU) patients before hospital discharge. In addition, up to two family members/close friends were also asked to complete the questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients (response rate 72%) and 246 family members/friends (response rate 79%) completed and returned the questionnaire. Although the majority of family members/friends and patients were satisfied with overall care, patients were generally significantly less satisfied (mean (SD) care subscale 75.6 (17.8) and 70.9 (17.3), respectively, (p=0.005). When individual items were examined, significant differences in nursing care (family/friends 80.1 (20.7) versus patient 75.9 (22.2), p=0.038) and inclusion in decision making (family/friends 53.9 (33.2) versus patient 62.0 (34.2), p=0.010) were found. CONCLUSION: The study showed a degree of congruence between patients and their family members/friends in relation to their satisfaction with the CCU experience. Thus, views of family/friends may serve as a proxy in assessing care and decision making processes of critically ill patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Appropriate training of the critical care team and provision of strategies to address the concerns of patients' families are needed to improve overall patient satisfaction.