Jieqiong Wang1, Wen Miao2, Jing Li3, Meng Li4, Zonglei Zhen5, Bernhard Sabel6, Junfang Xian7, Huiguang He8. 1. State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China. Electronic address: jieqiong.wang@ia.ac.cn. 2. State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China. Electronic address: mwinvent@gmail.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: lijingxbhtr@163.Com. 4. State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China; Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Germany. Electronic address: albertleemon@gmail.com. 5. National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China. Electronic address: zhenzonglei@Qq.Com. 6. Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg, Medical Faculty, Institute of Medical Psychology, Magdeburg, Germany. Electronic address: bernhard.Sabel@Med.Ovgu.De. 7. Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China. Electronic address: cjr.Xianjunfang@Vip.163.Com. 8. State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China; Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10090, China. Electronic address: huiguang.he@ia.ac.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) is a key relay center of the visual system. Because the LGN morphology is affected by different diseases, it is of interest to analyze its morphology by segmentation. However, existing LGN segmentation methods are non-automatic, inefficient and prone to experimenters' bias. NEW METHOD: To address these problems, we proposed an automatic LGN segmentation algorithm based on T1-weighted imaging. First, the prior information of LGN was used to create a prior mask. Then region growing was applied to delineate LGN. We evaluated this automatic LGN segmentation method by (1) comparison with manually segmented LGN, (2) anatomically locating LGN in the visual system via LGN-based tractography, (3) application to control and glaucoma patients. RESULTS: The similarity coefficients of automatic segmented LGN and manually segmented one are 0.72 (0.06) for the left LGN and 0.77 (0.07) for the right LGN. LGN-based tractography shows the subcortical pathway seeding from LGN passes the optic tract and also reaches V1 through the optic radiation, which is consistent with the LGN location in the visual system. In addition, LGN asymmetry as well as LGN atrophy along with age is observed in normal controls. The investigation of glaucoma effects on LGN volumes demonstrates that the bilateral LGN volumes shrink in patients. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The automatic LGN segmentation is objective, efficient, valid and applicable. CONCLUSIONS: Experiment results proved the validity and applicability of the algorithm. Our method will speed up the research on visual system and greatly enhance studies of different vision-related diseases.
BACKGROUND: The lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) is a key relay center of the visual system. Because the LGN morphology is affected by different diseases, it is of interest to analyze its morphology by segmentation. However, existing LGN segmentation methods are non-automatic, inefficient and prone to experimenters' bias. NEW METHOD: To address these problems, we proposed an automatic LGN segmentation algorithm based on T1-weighted imaging. First, the prior information of LGN was used to create a prior mask. Then region growing was applied to delineate LGN. We evaluated this automatic LGN segmentation method by (1) comparison with manually segmented LGN, (2) anatomically locating LGN in the visual system via LGN-based tractography, (3) application to control and glaucomapatients. RESULTS: The similarity coefficients of automatic segmented LGN and manually segmented one are 0.72 (0.06) for the left LGN and 0.77 (0.07) for the right LGN. LGN-based tractography shows the subcortical pathway seeding from LGN passes the optic tract and also reaches V1 through the optic radiation, which is consistent with the LGN location in the visual system. In addition, LGN asymmetry as well as LGN atrophy along with age is observed in normal controls. The investigation of glaucoma effects on LGN volumes demonstrates that the bilateral LGN volumes shrink in patients. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The automatic LGN segmentation is objective, efficient, valid and applicable. CONCLUSIONS: Experiment results proved the validity and applicability of the algorithm. Our method will speed up the research on visual system and greatly enhance studies of different vision-related diseases.
Authors: Manuel A Schmidt; Michael Knott; Robin Heidemann; Georg Michelson; Tobias Kober; Arnd Dörfler; Tobias Engelhorn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Horbruegger; K Loewe; J Kaufmann; M Wagner; S Schippling; M Pawlitzki; M A Schoenfeld Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: María G García-Gomar; Christian Strong; Nicola Toschi; Kavita Singh; Bruce R Rosen; Lawrence L Wald; Marta Bianciardi Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Kai Kiwitz; Andrea Brandstetter; Christian Schiffer; Sebastian Bludau; Hartmut Mohlberg; Mona Omidyeganeh; Philippe Massicotte; Katrin Amunts Journal: Front Neuroanat Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.856